Think it’s time for a Dummy’s Guide To The Difference Between “Illegal migrants”, “Asylum-seekers” and “Refugees” because some people are badly mixing up those terms. Basically, just because you came via an “illegal” route doesn’t make you an illegal migrant - or vice-versa.

The US averages about 5 *fatal* stabbings by knife every DAY. In addition to the 42 fatal shootings each day. So if any US hatemongers wish to leap on the 2 *non-fatal* stabbings in the UK this week they really should fuck off and sort out their own much bigger problems first.

How embarrassing for all those who claimed Hannah Spencer was wearing a £1800 Gucci silk blouse. 🤣🤣🤣

He's a trillionaire who spends every day on this app trying to start a race war and incite riots. Imagine having all that money and still behaving like an incel living in his mum's basement.

The far right really don’t like it when you call them stupid, - even when it’s @RealDannyTommo acknowledging they “get confused” by the country box in the sign-up form for his militia so need to be reminded to click England. 🤣

RT @thelefttake: Leave your echo chamber. Go outside and speak to literally anyone.

🚨🇬🇧 Look, Lucy Connolly is not the brightest button, so let's help her understand why she went to prison for her tweet, and why Bushra will not go to prison for her's. Bushra Shaikh is not saying: “Go and burn white people’s houses down.” She is making a sarcastic point about the racist double standard at the heart of these riots. When a Muslim, Black, brown, or migrant man commits a crime, the far-right does not just blame the individual. They blame the whole community. They march on mosques. They attack hotels. They threaten families. They burn infrastructure. They turn one person’s alleged crime into a licence for collective punishment. When a white man commits a crime, nobody asks whether we should burn down white neighbourhoods, attack white families, or terrorise random white people in retaliation. Why? Because most of us understand the basic moral principle here: individuals are responsible for their own crimes. Communities are not collectively guilty because of the race, religion, or immigration status of an offender. That is Bushra’s point. Lucy Connolly’s tweet was different. She did not ask a sarcastic question exposing the absurdity of collective punishment. She targeted migrant hotels - the exact infrastructure already being demonised by the far-right - and wrote: “Set fire to all the fvcking hotels full of the bastards for all I care.” And then mobs did exactly that. That is not a clever point about hypocrisy. That is not anti-racism. That is not “free speech absolutism.” It is language directed at a vulnerable out-group, in a volatile real-world context, approving or encouraging the destruction of the places they were living. Bushra’s post says: “Why don’t you apply your own logic when the offender is white?” Lucy’s post said: “Burn down the hotels full of migrants.” If you can’t see the difference, I can't help you.

A White Brit was literally jailed last month for a public attempted beheading. But Reform, Farage, Lowe, Musk etc didn’t make outraged posts about that case. Because REFORM rhetoric was her gateway to far right groups (whose members openly support Restore).

I'm awaiting the inevitable "We never had violence or terrorism in *Belfast* before we let in immigrants!" posts from the world's stupidest pricks.

RT @EatTheRich2025: Biba Henry & Nicole Smallman were two sisters horrifically killed in a London park in broad daylight. Two Met police of…

Every British hard right git who backed Vance today - Farage, Goodwin, the GB News bigots - should be made to explain whether it was Sikhs, Indians or non-whites they thought should never have been allowed to migrate to the UK. Don’t let them dodge this. x.com/SamRWolf/status/206327…

The constant banging on about DEI is an infuriating American import into the UK. In the UK we call it EDI. And EDI training is essentially summed up like this: ‘Don’t be a knob to other people, and realise some people face barriers you don’t.’ It’s not some woke conspiracy.

You say that post-Floyd DEI training created the policing culture that killed Henry Nowak. This is testable. If you're right, the pattern should begin after 2020. It doesn't. Christopher Alder, 1998. Falklands veteran. Dragged handcuffed and unconscious into a Hull custody suite. Left face down on the floor. Officers stood around while he choked to death. Ten minutes before anyone helped. Inquest: unlawful killing. Five officers charged. All acquitted. Sean Rigg, 2008. Schizophrenic man, died at Brixton police station after restraint. Inquest found "unsuitable and unnecessary force" and police failings "more than minimally" contributed to his death. Robert Edwards, 2011. Died in a Suffolk cell. The IPCC found police "failed to take appropriate care" and didn't carry out proper welfare checks. The coroner said he should never have been deemed fit for detention. Wayne Couzens, 2015–2021. Reported for indecent exposure in 2015. Kent Police had his name, address, and plate number. The investigating sergeant knew his brother, also a police officer. No action. Failed vetting twice, still became a Met officer. Exposed himself days before murdering Sarah Everard. The investigating officer lied about CCTV. Three forces had twenty years of red flags. Nothing to do with DEI Post-Floyd, still no DEI involvement: Stephen Reardon, 2023, had seizures in a police van while the officer said he was "playing games". Died. Jerome Cowan, 2022, found unresponsive in a library, officers failed to provide first aid. Died. A man at St Erth, 2022, left drunk and vulnerable outside a railway station on a cold night, officers drove past without stopping. Died. All officers dismissed or facing gross misconduct. Same pattern every time. A person in distress needs help, officers dismiss it or walk away. It happened in 1998, 2008, 2011, 2022, 2023, and 2025. DEI didn't create it. It predates it by a generation. You also claim "determined, institutional silence". The Speaker acknowledged the case on 1 June. The Home Secretary called it "a horrifying act" and Digwa's false accusation "an evil act" in an oral statement to the Commons on 2 June. Debated in both Houses. Starmer and Baddenoch clashed over it. Front-page news for a week. There is no silence. You invented it because your baseless argument needs it. You ask pretentiously what you call a system where a dying teenager's word counts for less than his killer's. I'd ask you: what do you call a system where Christopher Alder choked to death on a custody floor in 1998 while officers stood around, and twenty-seven years later Henry Nowak bled to death saying the same words? That is an ideology. But not the one you're describing. It's an institutional ideology of indifference to people in police custody, and it has been killing people for decades. Blaming a training course that's existed for five years for a rot that's existed for hundreds of years isn't analysis. It's a deflection that protects the actual dangerous ideology.