I’m Long Gamma.

Joined March 2009
1,401 Photos and videos
Sean McLaughlin, NLD πŸ“ˆ retweeted
I often see people say they really struggle to hold for bigger moves. I think personality can have an effect like most people will say but in my opinion , a lot of it is to do with your process not aligning with your goals. Take an easy real world example. Someone who wants to lose weight but struggles with snacking. If this person constantly buys snacks, has them all over the house in plain sight etc, is it any wonder they eat them a lot?! They may consider themselves a β€˜snacker’ but what if they changed their process and habits?! What if they stopped buying snacks, if they bought them then only having a few and hiding them out of sight. Would they be more likely to stop snacking as much?! Same goes for trading. If your goal is to hold for a bigger move, is it any surprise that you struggle to do that if you’re focusing on intraday charts, obsessing over your PnL, and checking the stock 50 times a day?! What if you did the opposite? Only looked at daily/weekly charts, turned off your PnL, only checked the stock twice a day. Do you think you’d get better at holding even if you think your personality is more geared to shorter term trading? It becomes much easier to achieve your goals when your process aligns with the outcomes you desire.
11
8
115
7,632
Sean McLaughlin, NLD πŸ“ˆ retweeted
Exactly. Treating it like a serious game instead of life or death changed everything for me. Once losses stopped feeling like failure and just became the cost of finding the next winner, I could finally follow my process without emotion getting in the way. Love the game, love the process β€” profits follow.
1
1
5
1,633
This ad is ridiculous
Stretch currently offers a 11.50% annual dividend rate, paid monthly. $STRC
1
154
Sean McLaughlin, NLD πŸ“ˆ retweeted
Jun 12
How to create billions of dollars from air (space) $SPCX Step 1: Buy Twitter for $44B (Oct 2022), fire most staff, lose most ad revenue. Step 2: AI startup xAI β€œacquires" X for $125B - $1B cash generated, zero value created. (Mar 2025) Step 3: SpaceX "acquires" xAI at $250B -$1.25T combined valuation. Nice 100% return in a year. (Feb 2026) Step 4: List SpaceX at $1.75T, 4% float, get index inclusion rules changed, shorten lock-ups, let leveraged ETFs squeeze it higher. Increase valuation $500B in 4 months. (June 2026) X stake now up 180%. Financial engineering masterclass. Step 5: Combine with Tesla.
106
388
4,584
776,073
Objects in motion tend to say in motion. Garrett Motion $GTX about to print new all-timers (again).
2
451
With all the newfound liquid wealth sloshing around, surely brands like $WSM will be benefiting from home decor upgrades. Investors think so, anyway...
1
803
So many REITs making all-time highs. Here's $SPG
4
494
I haven't yet found a canned/bottled coconut water I like, but investors are liking $COCO
3
6
1,254
Fresh all-time highs in $AMKR
1
6
1,060
Similar story for $ACMR
704