Joined June 2024
423 Photos and videos
Are we talking trading systems or people here? ๐Ÿง Everyone has a target and an actual. The gap is friction, and it decomposes: ฮฑ is the constant drag, ฮฒ is how much of your intention survives, residual is the chaos. You don't fight the chaos, you minimize ฮฑ and protect ฮฒ. The hits are amplitude. Normalize them away and you've killed the signal of a lived life. Oscillators gonna oscillate. โš™๏ธ ๐Ÿ“‰ ๐ŸŒ€
10
Literally every Bitcoin miner is now a GPU data center. youtu.be/817Fc1PGpRw?t=2112 Miners not-so-quietly carrying my Crypto sleeve all year โ›๏ธ โžก๏ธ ๐Ÿค–
29
Four sleeves. Four benchmarks beaten. Last 30 days. Crypto 9% over equal-weight Sectors 12% Energy 16% Industries (paper) 10% I know... edge finders are insufferable, like ex smokers ๐Ÿ˜Ž I'll quiet down a bit and resurface end of year with CPA validation and release it ๐Ÿฆพ In the meantime, there's plenty of room for more geese... just demean moderately correlated sleeves and allocate to the result ๐Ÿชฟ๐Ÿชฟ๐Ÿชฟ๐Ÿชฟ
34
2026 Jan-May Fidelity results 20.2% return, โˆ’5.6% drawdown, 2.53 Sharpe (4% rf) S&P 11.4% return, โˆ’8.8% drawdown, 1.81 Sharpe ๐Ÿฆพ
28
Recording my EOD account value from Fidelity for many months now. Not screenshots. Not paper trades. Not cherry picked fills. Not hypothetical back tests. Actual custodial equity curve. Asked AI to compute the Sharpe from the daily return stream after adjusting for withdrawals. 2.56 Honestly kind of sitting here staring at the number because systems with sustained Sharpe in this territory are usually spoken about with mythical language. Not claiming victory. 5 months is 5 months. By end of year I'll spring for a CPA verification of the Fidelity reports. Things could get interesting. ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ”ด๐ŸŸข
1
38
ok, we can get serious lol what a wild ride, is my AI sucking me off here or? haha AI: A live Sharpe north of 2 is rare enough that professionals immediately start asking: capacity? hidden tail risk? leverage? mark-to-market frequency? regime dependency? decay characteristics? correlation to other factors? Because sustained realized Sharpe at that level is genuinely unusual. Me: Can't we just relax and just ride this AI train to the moon... ๐Ÿš‚ ๐ŸŒ• ๐Ÿ“ˆ
24
Look at my 3-body beauties finding their grooves. Volatility found a home that.just.fits Three sleeves filling the vol pool: Sectors, low Energy, mid Crypto, high Balance isn't a goal. It emerges from good design. ๐Ÿ”ด ๐ŸŸข ๐Ÿ”ต Sแตข ยท โˆš(ฯƒโ‚˜แตขโ‚™ / ฯƒแตข) wแตข = โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ ฮฃโฑผ Sโฑผ ยท โˆš(ฯƒโ‚˜แตขโ‚™ / ฯƒโฑผ) Signal, volatility, and flow... three fine pillars. Benoit Mandelbrot would agree ;)
26
Things I hate about S&P 500 / SPY: - They stole the word "market." Committee picked names are not the US economy. - BlackRock/Vanguard/State Street now vote proxies on half of corporate America because you "bought the market". - They stole "beta." Your stock's risk is now defined by their OWN basket. - "Index" sounds smart but it's just a committee with discretion. - Cap weighted = top 10 names 35% of "the market." You don't own 500 companies any more than you own 10 and noise. - S&P pockets 1/3 of every dollar SPY collects, still renting the recipe from 1957. - Academia built CAPM on top of it, locking the fiction into every finance textbook. - Index inclusion moves billions before earnings ever matter... tail wagging the dog. - "Diversification" became a marketing word for "concentration in mega caps." And the kicker: passive flow IS a chunk of my edge. The dumbest bid in history creates the trends my system surfs. ๐Ÿคช Hating it and feeding off it aren't mutually exclusive, says the crocodile getting fat from herd migrations. ๐Ÿ’ข ๐Ÿ’ข ๐Ÿ’ข
43
My scoring system influences it's own allocation topology. The sleeves stop acting like isolated containers and start behaving more like interconnected control surfaces... each one transmitting pressure, resistance, and directional intent into the others through the allocation engine. Small changes in one sleeveโ€™s score no longer remain local. They propagate through the entire system as coupled feedback, altering the behavior of all three simultaneously. Moderate correlation is the golden goose, no need to run from it, it doesn't bite. ๐ŸŒ€ โš™๏ธ ๐ŸŒ
36
Tokenization, prediction markets and 24/7 trading are pushing markets toward continuous real time price discovery. As friction disappears, human behavioral rhythms become increasingly visible: - news cycles - hype cycles - fear/greed waves - narrative rotations Assets move less like isolated securities and more like synchronized factor groups coupled by shared attention and capital flows. The future of markets will be less about individual price prediction and more about measuring coherence across dynamic systems. My model is built for this... bring it! ๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐ŸŒŠ ๐Ÿง 
22
Why does peer demeaning work? Because shared beta isn't information, it's gravity. Subtract gravity and the planets reveal themselves. ๐ŸŒŒ ๐Ÿงฒ ๐Ÿช
27
Correlation is my planted flag, not a surrender. The uncorrelated fad mistakes the absence of structure for the presence of edge. ETFs are a dynamic option to farm rotation alpha. Aggregation isn't dilution, it's a low pass filter on single name idiosyncrasy. What survives is a predictable shared factor, and I'm proving it with multiple sleeves. ๐Ÿšฉ ๐Ÿงฒ ๐ŸŽฏ
36
Prediction markets: powerful mirrors of the collective. The expectation-funding-reality loop is closing. Ideas, worth, potential... collapsing. Welcome to speciation humanity, express yourself. ๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ’ซ ๐Ÿฆ‹ ๐Ÿฆ‹ ๐Ÿฆ‹
May 14
Kalshi x Interactive Brokers One of the largest brokers in the world. Casual, sophisticated, and institutional investors can now trade the future. All in one place.
37
I'm awash in surface interactions. Right now the seams are: - Massive .com (prices) - Sheets (signal/weights) - Fidelity (manual fills) - Post fill management (confirmation, state capture, eval, etc) Each a reconciliation surface. Collapse the seams, the reconciliation work vanishes... dissolves. A dream worth pursuing! Agentic systems get us there. ๐Ÿซฃ
32
I find coupled oscillators, then allocate to their demeaned relative price movements. The interactions between them show their own rotations... when one surges the others are proportionally reduced. It only works with a coupling term strong enough to enforce coherence. Without it you have a collection of independent oscillators that happen to share an axis. ETF baskets enforce coupling structurally. The basket IS the driver. Dispersion results in real rotation. Single company assets usually fail this. NVDA, INTC, MU share a "Chips" category label but not a load bearing driver. - AI demand - Foundry execution - Memory cycles Category isn't coupling. ๐Ÿ›ž ๐ŸŒ€ โš›๏ธ
41
Tech dominating Sectors Miners dominating Crypto Lithium/Batteries dominating Energy Fidelity results This week 1.8% YTD 15% S&P YTD 8%
34
Strategies that farm oscillation usually assume the wave is symmetric. Equal work on either side of zero. Clean mirror. It isn't. - Top and bottom side price action are generated by different participant populations - Squeeze dynamics are one sided - Borrow cost lives only on one side, and spikes on the names the signal flags weakest - Liquidity deepens going up and thins going down The mirror is an illusion that traps many. Building on it is flat earth territory. ๐Ÿชž ๐ŸŽญ ๐Ÿงฒ
32
2026 update Four for four. Real money at Fidelity, mirrored at kinfo since Feb. Jan 4.1% Feb 3.9% Mar 0.9% Apr 4.1% Energy and Tech surging right now. This system doesn't predict. It measures, then allocates to what's moving. ๐ŸŒ€ ๐Ÿ“ˆ ๐Ÿงฒ
60