gSenti everyone🫡
I’m among those who still believe that Sentient’s technological vision, open AGI approach, and long-term goals remain very strong. The work done on the product side, programs like Sparks, OG contributions, and the overall ecosystem design clearly show that this is not an “empty hype” project.
However, the ongoing uncertainty around the TGE is now starting to have a negative impact rather than a positive one.
On X, we can clearly see different perspectives:
@73lV_ believes that the TGE will not happen for a long time.
@OVGNFT thinks the process will be clarified very soon.
@nftmufettisi points out that the FDV is likely to remain at very high levels.
@Panchu2605 argues that by truly committing time, effort, and belief to a single project, a significant upside even something like a 100K $ return is still possible.
At the same time, some accounts are increasingly sharing the view that Season 1 rewards for Sentient OGs should now be explained in a clear and transparent way, ideally with concrete figures for example, explicitly stating something like a %2 allocation.
What stands out here is this:
There may be differing opinions within the community, but the shared expectation is communication.
Even if the team continues to run TGE-related programs privately, and even if campaigns like Sparks are announced selectively, at this stage the strongest, most accepted, and healthiest path forward is to clearly communicate promotions, demand-generation strategies, and reward mechanisms.
For this story to continue sustainably, clarity, a timeline, a defined reward framework, and demand-focused communication are no longer optional they are necessary.
The community is ready.
Demand exists.
What’s needed now is clear and timely communication.
@sandeepnailwal @vivekkolli @abhiskek095
@shad_haq_ @SentientAGI