COVID-19 vaccine injuries and death summary as of Jan 2024. 3,580 COVID-19 vaccine adverse events studies react19.org/science 1,621,120 Reports of adverse events/deaths in VEARS openvaers.com/covid-data 17 million COVID-19 vaccine deaths worldwide correlation-canada.org/covid…

🚨 Mind-blowing farmer confession that hits too close to home... 5th-generation cattle rancher Braden Jensen just dropped a bombshell: They injected 525 hogs with a live mRNA vaccine. Just 21 days later: 25 hogs dead outright 55 anorexic and near death 20 lame 12 lost all condition 25 more showing near-death symptoms This rancher isn’t talking about some sci-fi experiment... he’s describing exactly what countless people have reported after the mRNA shots for humans. Same spike protein tech. Same rapid, devastating outcomes. Same “safe and effective” sales pitch. What do y’all think about this??

Après être allé voir le film de Spielberg « Disclosure Day », je me livre ici à un exercice d’analyse et d’opinion devenu très courant sur les réseaux en seulement quelques jours… Pour ne pas spoiler ce film je vais simplement exprimer ce qu’il révèle à mes yeux, sans dire à travers quels personnages ou scènes. Tout d’abord, la principale divulgation apparaît à l‘évidence comme celle de la présence extraterrestre et le fait qu’elle ait été masquée depuis 79 ans (1947 : année du crash de Roswell et de la création de la CIA). Pourtant, ce n’est pas selon moi le message principal du film. Si cela n’avait été que cela il m’aurait déplu. Aucune preuve n’accompagne d’ailleurs ce film, mais seulement et comme par synchronicité le fait qu’il paraisse dans la période de juin 2026 où une authentique divulgation a bien lieu : elle se fait par le biais des déclassifications rendues publiques via le département américain de la défense, auxquelles s’ajoutent plusieurs témoignages d’officiels crédibles sur la récupération de vaisseaux et leur rétroingéniérie, comme ceux de David Grush ou de l’ancien ministre brésilien. Tout cela peut déjà paraître énorme pour certains mais ce n’est pas l’essentiel. Cela peut aussi être rejeté par d’autres car les preuves sont absentes. Toutefois, à ce propos je dois rappeler que la preuve est un peu comme la voiture balai de la science, car elle n’arrive que lorsque le nouveau paradigme est accepté par la conscience collective. Preuve et croyance sont ainsi beaucoup plus liées qu’on le pense : elles cimentent un paradigme, et ne diffèrent que par leurs côtés respectivement mental et émotionnel. Je pense plutôt que le message essentiel du film s’adresse à un public très large mais qui ne pourra l’intégrer qu’au niveau subconscient, car ce qu’il implique doit d’abord changer totalement notre paradigme, ou vision de la réalité. Ce processus d’intégration est facilité par le film, car au niveau subtil, profond et symbolique où il agit, même un rejet initial pourrait laisser place à une transformation consciente et positive à terme et c’est de ce point de vue qu’il me semble être une réussite. Pour comprendre ce point de vue, il faut voir Disclosure Day comme un thriller de science-fiction qui va bien au-delà d’une simple histoire d’extraterrestres : Il explore en effet comment la divulgation ou révélation d’une présence non-humaine transforme la perception de soi, de la réalité et de la spiritualité humaine. Les points clés du film sont en effet à mon sens les suivants : - La projection de conscience (ou vision à distance et bilocation) - L’action de la conscience à travers les métamatériaux - La différenciation entre langage et pensée - La guidance de la connexion intuitive - Le rôle psychopompe des animaux - Le sens spirituel des abductions Ces six points clés agissent comme différentes facettes du même message fondamental délivré par le film et qui concerne l’éveil spirituel de l’humanité. Car tous conduisent inévitablement à un rejet du matérialisme à travers une évidente dissociation entre les capacités du cerveau et celles de la conscience. Et même s’il n’est pas question de l’âme dans le film, elle se ressent à travers la connexion « transcendante » vécue par les deux principaux acteurs. Contrairement à ce que j’ai pu lire parfois sur les réseaux, je ne vois d’ailleurs aucune incompatibilité entre le message du film et celui des religions, sauf éventuellement pour ceux qui resteraient attachés à des préceptes ayant déformé l’origine de leur religion en imposant des règles à respecter ou en accordant un privilège aux humains de notre planète ou à certains d’entre eux : « Non, Dieu n’est pas celui de la terre ». Via ce rappel le film resitue au contraire la religion dans un contexte universel, et à l’encontre d’affirmations que j’ai vu passer sur les réseaux, le christianisme n’a aucunement à souffrir de cette divulgation. On pourrait d’ailleurs dire plus généralement que l’affirmation selon laquelle l’humanité pourrait souffrir de la divulgation à cause du chaos que cela produirait est une excuse qui a bon dos et qui cache autre chose… que je ne développerai pas ici. Je pourrais aller plus loin en développant les six points que j’ai cités, mais ce serait au risque de trop dévoiler, aussi je vais me contenter de faire là-dessus des liens instructifs : - Les projections ou bilocations de la conscience dans le film sont héritées de façon évidente des expériences de vision à distance ou sorties hors du corps de l’Institut Monroe que la CIA a longuement étudiées, - Le métamatériau activateur de ces facultés, parmi d’autres encore plus impressionnantes, peut être relié aux technologies de navigation par la conscience qui utilisent notamment les propriétés quantiques des cristaux. - La guidance intuitive bien représentée dans le film, ainsi que les différentes formes physiques que peut prendre le langage pour communiquer la même pensée, montrent bien la nécessité de dissocier le langage et la pensée, laquelle existe à un niveau non verbal plus fondamental et vibratoire (ou télépathique). - Le rôle des animaux dans le film me fait penser à mon propre vécu sur leur capacité à ramener une information issue d’une âme dont nous sommes déconnectés. - La façon dont les abductions sont délicatement interprétées dans le film, en dissonance avec les interprétations extrêmes qui en souvent faites, tantôt horribles tantôt divines, pointe vers une compréhension qui se situe dans le juste milieu. Alors évidemment, tout cela reste loin de la science ou de ce que les scientifiques peuvent accepter, mais il importe de rappeler que les preuves réclamées le sont par un mental qui veut toujours maintenir une croyance à laquelle il est attaché, alors même qu’il lui est impossible d’accéder à une vérité autre que relative, comme pour les IA, à cause du cadre imposé par le mental ou de son contexte implicite. La vérité, ou ce qui est réel, étant plutôt de l’ordre de l’expérience vécue ou du ressenti intuitif, tant que la science académique se cantonnera au rôle de voiture balai qui via sa méthode oblige les scientifiques à rester en bas de l’échelle de la connaissance, elle lui échappera et nous resteront de grands naïfs face à la réalité objective. La bonne nouvelle étant que nous allons enfin sortir progressivement de cette enfance de la raison, grâce à de multiples prises de conscience permises entre autres par ce film et les déclassifications qui l’accompagnent. A retenir : les OVNI ne sont pas seulement des machines, mais des catalyseurs d’éveil spirituel ou de la conscience non locale, comme Jacques Vallée et bien d’autres l’avaient pressenti. Le film initie le grand public à ces idées sans être un documentaire pouvant être classé de conspirationniste, sauf par quelques idiots du village français. Ces idées sont concrétisées via l’empathie, le trauma des expérienceurs et l’unité possible avec une conscience élargie. C’est beaucoup plus subtil et humaniste que beaucoup de thrillers ufologiques. Bien que le sens du merveilleux y soit moins présent, je retrouve finalement le Spielberg que j’ai adoré dans « Rencontres du 3ème type », lequel reste pour moi son meilleur film et chef d’œuvre en attendant que des éléments supplémentaires à venir ou une possible suite (qui s’impose) puisse véritablement le détrôner.

STUDY FINDS SUNSCREEN USE LINKED TO DRAMATICALLY HIGHER RISK OF MULTIPLE SKIN CANCERS A UK Biobank analysis of 470,000 people found sunscreen users faced significantly higher risk of: - MELANOMA: 292% - BASAL CELL CARCINOMA: 140% - SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: 126% This is what happens when you slather rapidly absorbed hormone disrupting chemicals all over your body while blocking vitamin D — one of the body’s key defenses against cancer. These dramatic cancer signals remained even after accounting for major skin cancer risk factors: age, sex, skin type, tanning ability, sunburn history, sunlamp use, and time spent outdoors.

When humans are trying to replace millions of years of evolution and adaptation (God's plan for some), we are at high risk of causing harm when we mistakenly believe we are doing good. We see this more and more. AROGANCE.

Yep, government and bureaucracy is here to help, don't ask questions, resistance is futile, you will be assimilated

Cancer Story! I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer in August 2023, and without treatment, I had 3-6 months to sort out my affairs. I began my fenbendazole Protocol immediately. I nearly quit up since my quality of life had deteriorated dramatically. But I started to feel better. Less nausea. I had gained some weight back! Increased energy. My scan in November 2023 indicated that this severe cancer had neither grown or spread. My cancer marker dropped from over 100,000 to 35,000. As of January 2024, my new marker number was 18k!!! My oncologist was just scratching his head, and a family member said he seemed bewildered! And no, I did not inform him about the fenben. I was terrified he'd drop me as a patient. I was quite appreciative for fenben and how it has helped me. I was feeling better and stronger. I had scans and bloodwork done in March, and my markers are now down to 6000. And the tumors were shrinking!!! Two weeks after my previous scan. I scanned again, and it returned NED. THIS WAS MY PROTOCOL; •MORNING ◦ Curcumin (600mg daily) ◦ Zinc (50mg) ◦ Milk thistle, As a food supplement, take 15 - 30 drops, 2-3 times daily in a little fruit juice or water. 7 days a week ◦ Serrapeptase (120,00Iu) ◦ Fenbendazole (1000mg of Panacur C is advised to be taken seven days a week. It is recommended that it should be taken with a meal). •NIGHT ◦ Curcumin (600mg tablet per day are recommended ◦ Berberine (600mg 2-3 times a day ) ◦ Quercetin (500mg 1/day) ◦ Turkey Tail ◦ Vitamin E (800mg for 7 days a week) ◦ Fenbendazole (1000mg at night) ◦ Ivermectin 12mg daily 5/7days a week •Limit sugar and processed food intake •Drank green tea often”

How to manufacture a crisis: A WHO commission wants to declare climate change a “global health emergency.” Their big evidence? Rising heat deaths in Europe. But once you adjust for an ageing society, the “crisis” essentially disappears. Even more dishonestly, the report conceals that cold deaths have declined by approximately 250 times as much as heat deaths have risen. wsj.com/opinion/global-warmi…

The goal of a bureaucracy is to create laws and layers of control. For the betterment of the bureaucracy, not the people.

Is the Gain-of-Function Cabal finally unraveling? Congratulations and thank you to everyone involved in detecting the smuggled monkeypox and arresting those responsible. A thorough investigation is necessary to identify all co-conspirators and prosecute them to the full extent of the law. justice.gov/usao-edmi/pr/fed…

We were warned by many back in 2020/2021 that this would happened. We all received the labels of conspiracy theorists, granny killers and antivax. We still need to see Legal actions to people and companies who pushed this.

Since the 1980s, the Sahara has shrunk by roughly 8%. Satellite data show widespread greening, a pattern that is playing out across the planet. Around 50% of Earth's vegetated land has become significantly greener, an area roughly three times the size of the United States. The dominant driver is not rainfall or land use change, it is rising atmospheric CO2. Higher CO2 lets plants photosynthesize more efficiently, they lose less water, they tolerate heat and dryness better. The effect is strongest along desert margins, across the Sahel, the Middle East, Australia's interior and the southern edge of the Sahara. Rising CO2 is making the deserts, and the planet as a whole, greener.

The legacy media is ignoring the biggest government scandal of my lifetime. The FDA knew that its system failed to flag safety signals from the COVID injection. Rather than disclose that information, agency officials chose to hide it and lie to the public. This is a massive scandal, and it’s time the media starts covering it.

Compared with conventional technologies, wind power requires vastly more raw materials for the same installed capacity. Up to 15 times more concrete, 90 times more aluminum, and around 50 times more iron, copper and glass. Each 2 megawatt turbine uses about 1700 tons of material, around 1300 tons of concrete, nearly 300 tons of steel, plus iron, fiberglass and copper. The foundation alone uses hundreds of tons of concrete. Concrete is one of the world's largest CO2 sources, responsible for 8% of global emissions. Then there are the rare earths. Just one ton of rare earth elements generates 2000 tons of toxic waste. Worse still, all of this ends up in landfill every 15 to 20 years, with the entire process repeated. Wind is not the clean energy it is sold to be.

Heart Cells Dysrhythmically Dance. After being “treated” with lipid nanoparticles. Rat heart cells (2024) human heart cells (2026) both showed irregular beating… plus massive increases in inflammatory IL-6. Both peer-reviewed by Schreckenberg et al. Video pulled directly from then 2024 paper, into a split screen visual for contrast. But it gets even more interesting. The new 2026 paper by Schreckenberg et al. mentions “even low concentrations of LNPs reaching the myocardium may be sufficient to elicit myocarditis” and “a massive increase in IL-6 expression”. IL-6 expression. Pfizer’s Bio-accumulation reports shows very “low concentrations ” in varied amounts going to almost all organs in the body. Professor Robert Clancy and Dr. John Campbell were “staggered” by the report released under Freedom of Information (FOI). Sen. Ron Johnson is days away from holding a formal Senate hearing on “Plausible Mechanisms of COVID-19 Injections”. Maybe this should be entered into the record?

I'm sure there's some missing mess to be added to this list, but a good start? 😄

🚨Dr Christopher Shaw, PhD: "We duplicated the Childhood VACCINE Schedule in mice & the ALUMINUM caused MASSIVE brain damage." Groundbreaking Study..."Aluminum Adjuvant Induces Motor Neuron Death..."

COVID changed something in me that cannot be unchanged. Not the virus. Not even the mandates. What changed it permanently was watching every government on earth arrive at the same silence, at the same moment, and hold it for six years running. Nearly six years since the rollout began. Not one head of state has stood before their people and said: some of you were harmed, we know it, and you deserve an honest accounting. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine authority. Not one compensation framework built on the actual scale of injury. The vaccine injured remain without diagnostic codes in most countries. Without legal recourse. Without the most basic institutional acknowledgment that what happened to their bodies was real. This is what accountable institutions do after genuine public health emergencies. They review. They audit. They ask who was harmed and how. They produce findings that are uncomfortable because the discomfort is the point. The discomfort is how trust gets rebuilt. What we have instead is a wall. And behind the wall, people who lost careers for raising questions that turned out to be legitimate. People who watched their governments promote Long COVID with full institutional weight while refusing to ask a single honest question about overlapping presentations in the vaccine injured. The same symptoms. The same mechanisms proposed in the literature. The convenient frame that points in every direction except at the product. The coordination is what tells you the most. Individual negligence looks different. It is patchy. It is inconsistent. Individual negligence produces whistleblowers, outliers, one government that breaks from the rest because the political cost of silence finally exceeds the cost of honesty. What we have is not that. What we have is universal. And universality of this kind does not emerge from independent actors independently deciding to do nothing. It is decided. There is a particular cruelty in what this does to the injured. It is not just that they are uncompensated. It is that the silence communicates something to them about their value. That they were considered acceptable losses before the fact, and inconvenient liabilities after it. That the calculus was made, and they lost. The psychological cost of that message, delivered not once but every single day through continued institutional indifference, is its own injury layered on top of the physical one. The children absorb this too. They are watching their parents fight for recognition against institutions that will not move. They are learning what governments actually mean when they say they will protect them. They are developing a relationship with authority that no civics class will be able to undo. The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people managing an honest disagreement about evidence. It is the behaviour of people who have made a collective calculation that the cost of telling the truth now exceeds the cost of never telling it. And that calculation, held simultaneously, across every major government on earth, is the most important public health finding of the last six years. Not what the virus did. Not even what the vaccines did. What the silence, together, reveals about who was making decisions, and who they were making them for.

Study Reports 96% Remission Rate of Alpha-Gal Syndrome with Novel Desensitization Technique With nearly 500,000 Americans now affected by tick-induced meat allergy, a peer-reviewed study reports almost unbelievable results using Soliman Auricular Allergy Treatment (SAAT). Enjoy meat again! @NicHulscher @McCulloughFund open.substack.com/pub/peterm…

BREAKING: Largest Human Cancer Study of Ivermectin Mebendazole Is Now PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED in a MAJOR Cancer Journal 84.4% of cancer patients taking ivermectin mebendazole for 6 months declared either CANCER DISAPPEARANCE, TUMOR REGRESSION, or CANCER STABILIZATION. Our study, “Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort,” is now peer-reviewed and published in Anticancer Research—a major international oncology journal of the International Institute of Anticancer Research (IIAR), established in 1995. The results represent one of the most compelling clinical signals ever documented for repurposed anti-parasitic therapies in oncology. A diverse population of cancer patients (n=197) was prescribed compounded ivermectin–mebendazole through a U.S. telemedicine platform, with each capsule containing 25 mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole. Participants were followed for approximately six months using standardized digital surveys assessing cancer outcomes, medication adherence, and tolerability. At approximately six months post-treatment initiation, we observed an 84.4% Clinical Benefit Ratio (CBR)—meaning more than four out of five patients reported either: No evidence of disease (32.8%) Tumor regression (15.6%) or Cancer stabilization (36.1%) Importantly, adherence was remarkably high, with 86.9% completing the initial prescription and 66.4% remaining on therapy at six months. Side effects were predominantly mild and manageable, reported in 25.4% of patients (primarily gastrointestinal), with 93.6% of those experiencing side effects continuing treatment after minor dosing adjustments. This groundbreaking peer-reviewed publication was made possible through a unique collaboration between The Wellness Company, the McCullough Foundation, and the Chairman of the President’s Cancer Panel—uniting real-world clinical data, frontline medical experience, and epidemiologic expertise to evaluate inexpensive, repurposed therapies with major translational potential. With these extraordinarily promising results, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are now required. In the meantime, many cancer patients are exercising their right to try. @twc_health @McCulloughFund @IIAR_Journals @P_McCulloughMD @DrHarveyRisch @DrKellyVictory @jathorpmfm @drdrew @PeterGillooly @FosterCoulson