19 | 🇪🇸 | él, he/him | animator for PPT2 #oscppt2, making my own object show slowly but surely | discord: @simplesack

Joined March 2020
1,045 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
PTW - avgn dance / kwik flip trend !! wanted to test my custom assets, BGs and compositing #avgn #osc #objectshowcommunity #objectshow #animationmeme #kwikflip #ptwosc
4
13
118
22,403
simple retweeted
5
227
3,231
23,620
BFDI Fans:
do you think if they made fun of bfdi instead of gameoverse they would get a lot less hate
1
2
37
simple retweeted
No, not like borat🖕 #punchout #yumeship
201
1,289
37,548
515,701
simple retweeted
Mayor Adam West Sketch
51
1,382
10,814
144,582
simple retweeted
2
530
5,659
33,398
simple retweeted
146
15,563
146,631
4,099,723
how 10 year old me was feeling when naily said "good riddance" after firey jr got out
genuinely why keep naily in
6
35
154
2,946
simple retweeted
but you can propose legal obligations to spy on our chats and try to constantly apply them despite being told no repeatedly yeah sure
'Stop Killing Games' has failed to secure new EU legislation despite having 1.3 million signatures The EU says it “cannot propose a legal obligation” requiring publishers to keep games playable after they stop being sold commercially
Community note
The EU Commission declined to propose legislation via the Citizens' Initiative, but campaign organizers state they are continuing by seeking to amend it into the Digital Fairness Act through the European Parliament. x.com/StopKilingGame… digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commis…
11
1,252
9,630
85,766
simple retweeted
760
13,912
118,173
2,487,781
simple retweeted
Made Spore in Spore
135
4,811
58,322
529,810
simple retweeted
I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this. The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home. There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered. What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business. Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not. This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy. That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids. What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes. Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming? No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.
My first instinct was to support the UK’s social media ban for under 16s. Protecting children from grooming, exploitation and harmful content seems like common sense. But I’m seeing a lot of opposition to it, so I’m genuinely curious as to why? One thing making me second guess is that platforms like bluesky are exempt, while at the same time there’s a push to let 16 year olds vote. To me that looks less like child protection and more like controlling where young people get their information. Interested to hear other perspectives.
146
4,870
19,337
759,816
Haha! Classic Jockington!
Chapter 5 has a lot of dialogue that you’ve probably never seen before!
9
654
5,941
47,771
simple retweeted
i did somethin (cosplay by MsRply_cos)
24
1,827
18,001
168,714
I remember an era where the video of the wallaces looking for cheese was the funniest thing on the platform
4
13
160
simple retweeted
버섯🍄‍🟫
버섯..
35
6,432
33,963
617,024
simple retweeted
I love this meme
42
2,203
35,869
400,142
simple retweeted
버섯..
34
3,238
17,976
821,738
simple retweeted
Jun 16
102
8,387
98,861
1,459,066
simple retweeted
Jun 16
microvaliance
6
337
4,549
39,638