Joined November 2008
17 Photos and videos
Ready for all those God of War: Laufey defenders to ignore how many of the people they claim just hate women in games just got excited about the Stellar Blade sequel and Code Veronica remake.
74
Trump: "Agree to our terms or I will do Bad Thing." Critics: "OMG! Bad Thing is a war crime! Never do Bad Thing!" Iran: "We agree to a ceasefire." Trump: doesn't do Bad Thing Critics: "TACO! TACO! TACO! Trump's such a pussy I can't believe he didn't do Bad Thing!"
2
120
Smileyhat retweeted
I know many great Catholics I know many great Orthodox Christians But this online tradslop of "Orthodox or Catholic but not yucky Protestant" has nothing but rotten fruit
107
57
1,042
33,313
A question we should be asking leftists. Think of how they still haven't recovered from (or properly answered) the question, "what is a woman?" and how that inability to answer simple questions looks to those who haven't seen what we've seen.
There is a very simple question all Republicans should be asking all Democrats, and it goes like this: "Why do you oppose the lawful enforcement of America's long-standing, bipartisan immigration laws?" Every conservative politician, journalist, influencer and commentator should basically have this question tattooed on their foreheads and it should be asked by each at least twenty times a day. But it's not. I don't know why. I seem to be the only person asking it.
1
87
Is YouTube auto-subscribing people to brand channels now? Twice now I've looked at my subscription list, and the channel for Claritin, the allergy medicine, is there. I unsubscribed from it last time I saw it there, and now I'm subscribed again.
1
47
Smileyhat retweeted
Walmart Security: Ma'am, may I see your receipt? Liberal with stolen TV: Do you know who else asked to see people's papers?
51
387
6,856
63,663
This needs to get around more. Leftists (the ones who know what they're doing, not merely useful idiots) are setting up conditions to use babies as human shields.
Operation ICE Floyd info! Aside from the technique of disingenuously dragging Israel into this and thus giving away that she's copying the Hamas playbook, what we see here deserves to be named. For lack of a better term, this is a form of Premptive DARVO (Pre-DARVO). DARVO is an acronym. Deny Attack Reverse Victim and Offender It is a tool psychopathic abusers and narcissists use not only to avoid accountability but to turn themselves into the victims and abuse their accusers. Normally, DARVO is used after the fact. A psychopathic abuser is caught doing something psychopathic and abusive, and the DARVO cycle initiates. They Deny wrongdoing and go on the Attack, accusing the person who caught them of causing the problem so they can Reverse the roles of Victim and Offender. Something like this: "I'm not provoking ICE! ICE is provoking us by being here! ICE is here to hurt us. I'm just engaging in defense of my community! It's self-defense!" DARVO can be deployed preemptively too, though, as we can see from the narcissistic abuser below (who is not the only one doing it, btw). She is pre-framing a dangerous situation so that if or when something bad happens, she has already reversed the roles of victim and offender. What's currently happening in Minnesota with ICE is generally classic DARVO according to the hypothetical snippet above, and because it has been believed (and because they're using the Hamas playbook now, actively), mothers are showing up with their babies to obstruct, taunt, provoke, and "protest" ICE, deliberately inviting ugly incidents they can capitalize upon. Below, we see a psychopathic abuser responding to the official DHS account, which has jurisdiction over ICE (NB: whoever runs this account (Micah Bock, cough) is a Woke Right idiot who should be fired too, but that's beside the point). The DHS account made the simple and plain statement saying not to bring babies to these obstructionary "protests." The psychopathic abuser preemtively framed this as DHS "pre-justifying killing babies," adding in "just like Israel did" to make it even less honest, more psychopathic, and more appealing to their deranged base (which insanely believes Israel did the same thing in Gaza). That's Pre-emptive DARVO (Pre-DARVO). Her goal is to get people to believe that any encounter that arises between a delinquent obstructionist and provocateur that involves a baby she brought to the scene as a human shield is ICE deliberately targeting babies in order to harm them, and believe me, these lunatics will work overtime to get that to happen, including to their own babies. On the other hand, they'll also say they don't want it to happen while placing all responsibility on ICE not to do anything to the obstructionist and provoking activities they're engaging in, forcing ICE to either stand down or do something that's been pre-framed as deliberate and heinous when it isn't. This is unbelievably psychotic on every level. Now, you might think I'm exaggerating about what's happening, but this is directly out of the Woke activist playbook (with a Hamas twist of using babies, not just women and mothers, as human shields. See BeautifulTrouble.org. Let's take a short tour. 1) Yes, they want to provoke ICE to react with their obstruction and provocation. They train for it. They understand that getting ICE to do something they can frame as monstrous discredits the organization, their operations, and their chain of command with the watching public. ("The real action is your target's reaction" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 2) Yes, they understand that this puts ICE into a lose-lose position, and that's their whole point. They train for this too. ("Put your target in a decision dilemma" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 3) Yes, this is a theatrical program for the watching audience of the broader public in addition to a direct action against ICE in their communities, and they know it. Their own materials instruct them to film and on how to catch ugly moments (which they have provoked) on film so they can publish them out of context, which reliably works. ("Play to the audience that isn't there" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 4) Yes, they are doing deliberately escalating provocations in order to get the reactions they want out of the targets they want to abuse and delegitimize, and they train for this too. ("Escalate strategically" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 5) Yes, they understand the power of putting "sympathetic characters" like women, mothers, and innocent babies in the line of fire as a political weapon and shield. ("Lead with sympathetic characters" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 6) Yes, they understand the power of narrative framing and are doing it all the time, including DARVO and Pre-DARVO. ("Reframe the issue" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 7) Yes, they are using techniques like Pre-DARVO to set narratives they can exploit if the opportunity arises. ("Think narratively" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 8) Yes, they are hoping to provoke situations that allow them to litigate or prosecute and have trained "legal observers" on site to capitalize on anything they possibly can, including training people to take deceptive video out of context that can be used as evidence in court (or social media) later. ("Use the law, don't be afraid of it" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 9) Yes, they are specifically targeting ICE officers in order to discredit and delegitimize ICE, DHS, Secretary Noem, Trump and his administration, Republicans, conservatives, America, and Trump's very popular immigration policy, and they know it. This is the big-picture strategy. ("Choose your target wisely" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 10) Yes, bringing women, mothers, and babies to the front lines and putting them deliberately in harm's way is a strategic tactic they're making use of on purpose. ("Choose tactics that support your strategy" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) 11) Yes, they understand the power of Pre-emptive DARVO and DARVO. ("Brand or be branded" beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) Those are just from the PRINCIPLES section of Beautiful Trouble. Many of their organized TACTICS (beautifultrouble.org/toolbox…) are also in play, including at least: Artistic vigils, blockades, civil disobedience, distributed action, lamentation, mass street action, occupation, storytelling, and V-formation. In other words, what is happening is a highly coordinated, tactical operation taking place on multiple levels, with media apparatchiks like Gray (here) playing a supporting role with DARVO and Pre-emptive DARVO as part of the strategy.
1
1
43
Smileyhat retweeted
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
34
643
2,813
79,934
Minnesota has provided us with yet another good example of the Communist and radical principle of "your target's reaction is your real action," which is a key strategic tactic for them. For many months, ICE and other federal law enforcement, not to mention Trump himself, have been made out to be the kinds of tyrants that have to be stopped at almost any cost, including by reckless citizen actions, like obstructing law enforcement, resisting arrest, throwing things at police, etc. All of it is framed out in ridiculous false narratives designed to "come true" at the moment of crisis, at which point they will seize control of the narrative to drive specific, pre-planned action. In this case, the false narratives are not just about the status of federal law enforcement and ICE but also about their alleged unwillingness to work with or coordinate with local and state police who have, behind the scenes, been ordered to be non-compliant, if not softly antagonistic. This is called "Operational Preparation of the Environment" in the unrestricted or political warfare environment in which radicals today do their work. The model they're using is called "reflexivity" and is George Soros's "shoelace dialectic" (his terms) as a theory of change. The goal was always to create antagonistic situations between citizens, who can be framed as fighting a noble anti-oppression cause, and ICE, who can be framed as engaging in unwelcome oppression. By ordering local and state police to be uncooperative, not only do the operations fall more heavily on federal law enforcement, but also several other things are achieved. For examples, a) Locals can be led to believe federal law enforcement is operating outside of the bounds of the more local law and against the wishes of their state/locality, which they are led to believe holds sovereignty; b) This generates a conflict between the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution and local and state law enforcement that citizens are led to believe renders the federal LEOs out of line; c) Local and state police aren't usually openly antagonistic, therefore creating an illusion of resistance to the feds that they cannot actually fulfill because of their roles, shifting responsibility onto (activist) citizens; d) Circumstances where local citizens are believed to be on the side of the rightful law against oppressive alien law (and may expect diminished or no consequences for resisting the "alien" law, even though it is actually supreme). There are more we could think of, I'm sure, but a key point is that the leadership in states like Minnesota (and California, etc.) know they're creating this powder keg of citizen versus federal law enforcement (here: ICE) while spreading various agitating narratives like about fascism, "protecting communities and neighbors," etc. They are the primary willful bad actors in this situation, together with some professional and other paid agitators who take things to the next level on the streets. The goal is to get citizens to obstruct and even threaten or attack ICE, which in effect creates a decision dilemma for ICE/federal law enforcement. Either the feds can stand down and thus negate the Supremacy Clause and fail to do their jobs, or they can act within their authority and seek to arrest and detail the people obstructing their lawful mandate that the states are resisting less directly and more through engineered fuckery (for lack of a better word). Once that happens enough times, statistics kind of take over. Some proportion of those antagonistic encounters will go sideways. Eventually, as happened yesterday, you'll find a federal law enforcement (ICE) agent do something, either unreasonably or reasonably with sufficient ambiguity (as here), to frame it as an illegitimate overreaction and initiate the reflexive campaign on what looks like firm footing. Soros's reflexivity dialectic (his word for it) works by generating the conditions for chaos and then placing down "guideposts" through the chaos once it arises. He says that himself in The Alchemy of Finance (1992) in the first chapter. The goal is to generate chaotic environments in which "historical change" (his term) can occur and then to shape the outcome of that change when it arrives by leading people to believe certain things about the chaotic environment they're in that gets them to take specific actions they wouldn't otherwise take. In this case, the points of the reflexive campaign are really obvious because they keep saying them over and over and over: get ICE out of Minnesota (and thus protect their rampant fraud racket) and impeach Secretary Noem (take down a political rival so they can demand a more compliant replacement). Classic Bolshevik moves using Soros's media-based reflexive dialectic as the mechanism. Further, as Governor Tim Walz made clear, he's willing to try to induce a profound crisis by naming Minnesota as being "at war" with the federal government and threatening to attempt to deploy the National Guard against federal law enforcement (in violation of their Constitutional oath), which creates a constitutional crisis and is, frankly, direct insurrection he should be prosecuted for. This puts the Trump Administration in a similar, higher decision dilemma: deal with Walz on these terms and trigger a huge falsely justified reaction on the Left or let him get away with what amounts to literal insurrection to avoid that trap. We called this same dilemma the "Trump Trap" back in 2020, but the stakes are actually higher now, even though the situation isn't as heated. So, there's the Minnesota ICE Floyd psyop in a nutshell. They've used the reaction of the ICE officer (shooting a woman he believed for good reason was posing an imminent threat) to justify not just this campaign but the direct actions in the streets (which were also coordinated, funded, and ready to be activated in the same way the National Guard is on standby), and with a certain population, most of whom lean Left, it will work. That's what's happening.
115
602
2,007
110,897
Smileyhat retweeted
Whether the driver intended to run down the officer is irrelevant. What matters is that she was in control of a 4,000-pound vehicle (a vehicle can instantly become a lethal weapon) After being ordered out of the vehicle by law enforcement, she refused to comply and instead attempted to flee. In doing so, she accelerated. Directly in front of her vehicle was an ICE agent. He had no way of knowing whether she intended to strike him or whether she simply failed to turn in time. But intent is not something an officer can safely assume in a split second. What he did know was that a 4,000 ton vehicle was accelerating straight toward him. He knows the driver was just moments before ordered to exit the vehicle and had already made clear she had no intent to comply or respect law enforcement. Video footage appears to show the car at least brushing his left leg as it accelerates. He had only a moment to react to what, from his perspective, was an imminent threat to his life. To label that response “murder” is reckless and dangerous. The rhetoric from Jacob Frey and others is incendiary rhetoric that jumps to massive conclusions for the sole purpose of inciting violence. Blaming the ICE agent ignores the basic realities of use of force laws and likely won't have much standing in court
185
436
2,721
47,123
20 Mar 2018
1
29 May 2009
@genar Indeed. Let's make one.
1
29 May 2009
Heart attack waiting to happen: http://tinyurl.com/meatbread http://tinyurl.com/meatbread2

1
30 Jan 2009
Getting teeth pulled today. Yaay. Dr. Horrible will keep me company. http://www.drhorrible.com/mushortio.html

1
27 Jan 2009
@genar Maybe now he'll learn that trucks do not belong on the top of a lake.
1
27 Jan 2009
It may be cold, but at least you're not this guy: http://tinyurl.com/ccv83m

1
23 Dec 2008
Oh yeah, I have one of these don't I? Not much to say, so have a link. http://tinyurl.com/6e72xx

1
29 Nov 2008
@mross42345 Perhaps you're thinking of a smiley-cat?
1
28 Nov 2008
@devinemem It must be, if you're bustin' out the wine *and* the Frosted Flakes. Sounds like a good night right there.
1
28 Nov 2008
@genar Well I guess you're just going to have to do it again when you get home, aren't you? I'll get the camera.
1