Our new article "Maternal Employment Patterns and the Risk for Child Maltreatment" by @wjschneid, @meg_feely, and Jeehae Kang is available to read for free online: journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10…
SSR would like to thank to our Editor-in-Chief @jen_mosley, editorial team, authors, and all of our reviewers for making 2023 another fantastic year for the journal!
We are excited about what's in store for 2024—our first issue of the year comes out in March.
Congratulations to Sandra Leotti, Jennifer Muthanna, and Ben Anderson-Nathe! Their recent SSR article, “Failed Mothers, Risky Children: Carceral Protectionism and the Social Work Gaze,” was honored with the 2023 Feminist Manuscript Award from @CSocialWorkEd.
#SSWR2024 was full of great research, and we know that there’s even more excellent work that didn’t get in.
As you think about where to publish those papers, consider SSR! Information for authors is at the link.
journals.uchicago.edu/journa…
Mark your calendar now for 2 sessions at SSWR with SSR Editor @Jen_Mosley.
Thursday, 3:15: Invited Journal Editors Workshop, Marquis Ballroom Salon 12
Friday, 5:30: How Are Social Work Journals Advancing Social Justice & Scholarship in Changing Times? Marquis Ballroom Salon 8
On Games Day, read this article from Social Service Review to learn about the functions of games and why they are meaningful to cultural life. ow.ly/g9pB50QgB2W@SocServReview
Mark your calendar now for 2 sessions at SSWR with SSR Editor @Jen_Mosley.
Thursday, 3:15: Invited Journal Editors Workshop, Marquis Ballroom Salon 12
Friday, 5:30: How Are Social Work Journals Advancing Social Justice & Scholarship in Changing Times? Marquis Ballroom Salon 8
In our current issue, John Mathias, @AmyKrings, & @SamTeixeira10 examine the logics undergirding efforts to advance environmental social work.
They argue that environmental justice offers the best paradigm for adhering to social work ethics.
Read it at journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10…
ALT Social work has traditionally been concerned with the welfare of humans, a mission that some scholars want to expand to include other beings. How can concern for nonhumans & the natural environment best be integrated with the profession’s commitment to social justice? Although commentators have made several proposals, few have critically examined the dilemmas or trade-offs that may await a more expansive social work. Examining such challenges in environmental movements, we identify 3 logics by which some varieties of environmentalism have perpetuated inequity among humans. We then explore how diverse movements for environmental justice—which make equity among humans central to environmental activism—offer a path forward. Environmental justice foregrounds dilemmas raised by integrating concern for humans & nonhumans, & it offers principles for addressing these dilemmas that are rooted in a living tradition of practice. This makes environmental justice the best paradigm for social work.
Thank you @SocServReview for helping disseminate this work. It may be helpful to folks grappling w the integration of environmental topics in their practice and education. It emphasizes potential for unintended consequences.
As always, if you can't access this PDF, pls DM me.
In our current issue, John Mathias, @AmyKrings, & @SamTeixeira10 examine the logics undergirding efforts to advance environmental social work.
They argue that environmental justice offers the best paradigm for adhering to social work ethics.
Read it at journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10…
ALT Social work has traditionally been concerned with the welfare of humans, a mission that some scholars want to expand to include other beings. How can concern for nonhumans & the natural environment best be integrated with the profession’s commitment to social justice? Although commentators have made several proposals, few have critically examined the dilemmas or trade-offs that may await a more expansive social work. Examining such challenges in environmental movements, we identify 3 logics by which some varieties of environmentalism have perpetuated inequity among humans. We then explore how diverse movements for environmental justice—which make equity among humans central to environmental activism—offer a path forward. Environmental justice foregrounds dilemmas raised by integrating concern for humans & nonhumans, & it offers principles for addressing these dilemmas that are rooted in a living tradition of practice. This makes environmental justice the best paradigm for social work.
SSR is on BlueSky!
Conscious of the fact that some of our followers have left Twitter or are using it less, we've opened up a new account on BlueSky. If you use it, please find us there!
For the moment, we plan to post on both platforms and see how things unfold.
ALT SSR's BlueSky profile. The background issue is a set of bound volumes of Social Service review, and the profile pic is the SSR logo. The handle is SocServReview.BSky.Social.
The bio reads, "Since 1927, publishing thought-provoking, original research on pressing social issues and social welfare policies, organizations, and practices."
The first (and only) post reads, "Social Service Review has joined BlueSky!
If you are looking for innovative and rigorous research on social issues, social welfare policy, administration, or practice, please give us a follow. More to come!"
Celebrate International Volunteer Day by reading this article from Social Service Review that studies how volunteering has changed over time. ow.ly/4e6l50Qf517@SocServReview
How do undocumented residents navigate the contradiction of being counted by a government committed to their forced removal?
That's what Hannah Obertino-Norwood & @AGarciaUChicago ask in a study of how Chicagoans approached the 2020 Census.
Read more at journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10…
ALT Census enumeration distributes resources and power and extends potential surveillance and punishment. Given these dual capacities, attempts to insert a citizenship question on the 2020 US Census heightened expectations of depressed participation among undocumented immigrants. We draw on data from 63 undocumented Latin American residents of Chicago to understand decision-making processes across 15 months of enumeration. Analyzing two interview waves conducted before and during the count (N=126), we find broad census uptake despite widespread perceptions of threat. Respondents situated themselves as invested community members embedded in state systems and explained census participation as a claim for investment in neighborhoods and families as well as recognition of their existence. Contributing to the concept of bureaucratic visibility, this article extends scholarship on system avoidance to illuminate how undocumented immigrants engage the bureaucratic arm of the state (continued)