Kahit trial by publicity pa yan. Lung malinaw na walang ginawang mali, mapapatunayan nyo at ma-exonerate sya sa anumang akusa. Kaso mo wala nga kayong defense, so ang atake, dismissal ng kaso. Imbes na patunayan sa tao na wala syang ginawang pagnanakaw

Mga pulgas na pinarami ni digong.

Hahahha palitan na ang lyrics ng "Ako'y Pinoy" ni Florante. Mali pala sya!

Juskudugo Gusto ata maging Republic of Baliwag na ang bansa. Mga baliw!

One courageous soul, Dr. Melba. I hope many more rally behind her. This has been long overdue. The Mafia behind the leadership of INC has abused this country and their followers far too long.

❗❗❗ @DENROfficial What the heck?

PEPITO ALVAREZ SAYS HE IS CLOSE TO IDENTIFYING THE ‘MASTERMIND’ BEHIND FLOOD CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Palawan Rep. Pepito Alvarez said he believes he is close to identifying the person behind allegations linking him to the flood control controversy, claiming he already has a clearer picture of who may have orchestrated the affidavit. Speaking on #TheSpokes, Alvarez said intermediaries had spoken to several of the former military personnel involved and that none had directly identified his residence or provided details that would support claims that money was delivered to him. He also questioned inconsistencies in the allegations, noting that other individuals were supposedly linked to specific addresses and supporting details. Alvarez said he is considering legal action only against those he believes were directly involved in implicating him, including the individuals who allegedly connected his name to the affidavit and those behind its preparation. However, he suggested he may reconsider pursuing cases against some of the former soldiers if they admit they were misled, saying many of them were vulnerable and may have been enticed by promises of money. Watch the full episode on #TheSpokes.

Fuck you China

Ang isda lalo may amoy na masangsang sa bibig nahuhuli

Babawiin na lang daw ang villar kapag nasigurado na nila ang loyalty Tapos biglang ay, nagkamali nanaman po, dahil medyo nawindang sa dami po ng malita na nadeliver. Kabado, pagod na pagod at init na init daw nung araw na yun kaya medyo nahilo sila 👊🏾👊🏾✌🏾✌🏾

Tumama ka din! --ctto--

Mismo

“Truth doesn’t mind being questioned. The lie does not like being challenged.” Mother

BUKING. nagbabayad sa Media si Tukoooo

1. Avelino vs. Cuenco case kahit 1949 pa yan is still good law. Tanong mo Lowren sa DDS lawyer ibig sabihin nuon. 😂 2. Constitutions may change but Supreme Court rulings from the past are still valid unless overturned in a more recent decision. Yung power of contempt ng Senado? Galing yan sa old case of Arnault vs. Nazareno. 3. MOST IMPORTANTLY, the sentence or provision about quorum in the 1935 Constitution and the 1987 Constitution is exactly the same – “a Majority of each House shall constitute a quorum to do business…”. And this clause or sentence was the same clause analyzed by the Supreme Court in the case of Avelino to say that 12 out of 23 is legal quorum. You are a LIAR when you said iba na ang 1987 Constitution sa 1935 Constitution when it comes to quorum. For your consideration, your Honor Lowren Legarda. 🦋

SENATOR ALAN CAYETANO: CUT AND CUT CLEANLY I agree with the position of Senator Frank Drilon that there is a presumption of regularity in the declaration of all Senate positions vacant, including that of former Senate President Alan Cayetano. Alan knows this. That is why he has not gone to the Supreme Court to challenge his removal. Because at the heart of this latest Senate coup lies a reality that extends beyond questions of quorum, procedure, or parliamentary technicalities. The real issue is who has the numbers to control the Senate. And even assuming for the sake of argument that the Supreme Court were to rule in Alan’s favor, what then? On the first day of session, there would simply be another motion declaring all positions vacant. This time, there would be 13 votes. The reality is that parliamentary power ultimately rests not on titles but on numbers. Indeed, the issue may be resolved even sooner if the President calls a special session of Congress. If Alan has only ten votes and if reports are accurate that he may lose yet another supporter, on what basis can he continue to claim the Senate Presidency? The larger lesson for Senator Alan Cayetano and for the country is this: In a democracy, institutions are bigger than the ambitions of any one leader. No office belongs to any individual. Every position is held only so long as one retains the confidence of those empowered to confer it. Legitimacy does not come from clinging to office. It comes from retaining the confidence of those empowered to choose their leaders. This is why democratic institutions endure. Leaders come and go but institutions must continue to function regardless of the fortunes of any one person. When the numbers are gone, the title eventually follows. The wise course now is not to prolong the contest but to accept the verdict of the numbers. Therefore, I beseech you, Senator Alan Cayetano. Let the institution move forward. Cut and cut cleanly.

Kapal mo caldero. Since your invitation for the meeting is public, dapat public din actual meeting.We need records of your LIES! Ginamit mo ang public at media sa teatro mo sa senado simula noong May 11 kaya wag pa-ilalim ng kilos by having a private meeting with SenWin!

Ay wow, takot silang mas marami pang madulas na inconsistencies ang malita boys? Eh di samahan nila para i-guide ulit ni marcoleta. That speaks volumes. Ibig sabihin lang they are not really for ferreting out the truth BUT to plant intrigues.

Daming kwento tungkol sa future Senator na nag name-drop sa isang rally nung estudyante pa siya para huwag ma-aresto. Here's the original article in the Philippine Collegian about it. Sorry kung mahirap basahin, zoom in na lang. 🙂

Here's another take. Interesting to read another name kn the article.