Pete Sanford

Pete Sanford

51 Photos and videos

Tweets

Susan Jones retweeted

Pete Sanford

@PeteSanford

Jun 4

THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH OF BOVAER HARMS: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ: Environmental Risks of Bovaer (3‑NOP) Bovaer’s active ingredient is 3‑nitrooxypropanol (3‑NOP). It reduces methane by inhibiting an enzyme in the cow’s rumen. But the environmental risks come from everything that happens after the cow eats it*. Let’s break it down. 1. Manure Pathway Risks Even though 3‑NOP breaks down inside the cow, its breakdown products do not disappear. They move into: • manure • slurry • digestate • soil • water This is the biggest environmental unknown. Potential risks: • Accumulation of metabolites in soil • Impact on soil microbes (especially methanogens, nitrifiers, denitrifiers) • Changes in nitrogen cycling • Altered greenhouse‑gas emissions (N₂O, CO₂) • Leaching into waterways No long‑term, multi‑year field studies exist yet. 2. Soil Microbiome Disruption 3‑NOP targets methanogenic archaea. But soil is full of: • methanogens • nitrifiers • denitrifiers • fungi • bacteria If Bovaer metabolites suppress or alter these communities, the consequences could include: • reduced soil fertility • altered carbon sequestration • increased nitrous oxide emissions • reduced microbial diversity This is a classic “non‑target organism” risk. 3. Slurry Storage & Anaerobic Digestion Risks Most dairy farms store slurry in: • lagoons • pits • tanks • anaerobic digesters If Bovaer metabolites affect microbial activity in these systems, risks include: • reduced biogas yield • altered methane production • build‑up of intermediate compounds • changes in slurry stability Anaerobic digesters rely on methanogens — the exact organisms Bovaer is designed to inhibit. This is a major unknown. 4. Water Contamination Pathway If Bovaer metabolites enter water via: • runoff • leaching • spreading slurry on wet ground …they may affect: • aquatic microbes • algae • sediment chemistry • methane‑cycling organisms Freshwater ecosystems are extremely sensitive to chemical disruption. 5. Air Emissions Trade‑Offs Bovaer reduces methane — but environmental science warns of pollution swapping: Reducing one gas can increase another. Possible trade‑offs: • Lower CH₄ • Higher N₂O (300× more potent than CO₂) • Higher ammonia emissions • Changes in VOCs If nitrogen cycling is altered, N₂O could rise — wiping out methane gains. 6. Biodiversity Impacts If soil or water microbial communities shift, knock‑on effects include: • reduced earthworm populations • altered plant growth • changes in root‑microbe symbiosis • reduced insect biodiversity • altered decomposition rates Microbial disruption cascades upward through ecosystems. 7. Cumulative Impact Risk This is the biggest scientific gap. If Bovaer is used: • daily • in millions of cows • across entire countries • for decades …then the environmental load of its metabolites becomes chronic, not incidental. Cumulative risks include: • long‑term soil accumulation • multi‑year shifts in microbial ecology • regional water‑quality changes • altered greenhouse‑gas profiles • ecosystem‑level effects No country has yet conducted a cumulative environmental impact assessment. 8. Regulatory Blind Spot Regulators approved Bovaer based on: • Short Trials • Controlled Conditions • Limited Soil Studies • ZERO Multi‑Year Field Data • No Cumulative Modelling This is normal for feed additives — but unusual for something intended for global, daily, mass‑scale use. It’s the same regulatory gap that caused problems with: • Neonicotinoids • PFAS • Glyphosate • Microplastics All were approved before long‑term environmental effects were understood. Summary: The 5 Real Environmental Risks • Soil microbiome disruption • Slurry & anaerobic digestion interference • Water contamination pathways • Pollution swapping (N₂O increase) • Cumulative, long‑term ecosystem effects RISKS TO FARM WORKERS OF SERIOUS INJURY: Farmworkers handling Bovaer are warned to treat it like a dangerous lab chemical, not a harmless feed additive. The powder can burn the skin, damage the eyes, and irritate the lungs, which is why workers must suit up in chemical‑resistant gloves, full protective clothing, sealed goggles or a face shield, and sometimes even a respirator if dust is present. One careless breath, one splash, one moment without proper PPE — and the consequences can be immediate and severe. It’s a stark reminder that if something requires this level of protection to handle, it raises serious questions about its place anywhere near the food chain. THE BOTTOM LINE: PROFIT OVER SAFETY: 20 BILLION PROFITS YEARLY Behind the polished sustainability slogans lies a staggering financial engine: the Bovaer trademark holders stand to extract tens of billions in annual global profit if the additive becomes standard across the world’s 1.5 billion cattle. Every cow becomes a tiny revenue stream, every farm a captive customer, and every country a new frontier of monetisation. The scale is so vast that the real prize isn’t methane reduction at all — it’s the creation of a permanent, worldwide dependency on a patented chemical that must be bought day after day, year after year. When a single feed additive can generate profits on the scale of a pharmaceutical empire, you start to see why the marketing feels so urgent, and why the push for adoption never stops.

4:12

726

958

14,958

EMAIL YOUR MP: Scrap the family farms tax

Freedom Alliance is creating a UK free from digital ID and State and corporate overreach

Donate to Help me publish the scientific facts about Energy & Climate., organized by Brian Catt