And the way many people use the term "consensus" is not even wrong!
The "consensus" reached by a blockchain is very narrow; it's reached under special self-imposed constraints, and it's difficult to generalise beyond cryptocurrency.
#DigitalIdentity#HotTake 1/6
There is no such thing as identity theft; there is only data theft. Data breaches do not represent an “identity” problem but a data quality problem.
More: linkedin.com/pulse/rethinkin…
#digitalIdentity#HotTake 6/6
The Internet is not missing an "identity layer” but an authenticity layer.
We rarely need to know who someone really is. Instead we usually need to verify some specific fact about them, disclosing as little identity as possible.
We need specific facts and proofs, not open-ended identity.
Authenticity now is a far bigger issue than identity.
Let's broaden verifiable credentials to verify any important qualities of any digital thing.
More: lockstep.com.au/rethinking-d…
Little My is "determined and fiercely independent" from the Moomin books that I learned about thanks to my colleague @Steve_Lockstep. And yeah...there seems to be a "resemblance" I suppose?
"The Limits of Algorithms" An invited presentation to the AI in Asia conference, Korea University Law School, Dec 16, 2016. lockstep.com.au/the-limits-o…
3/tech like cryptocurrencies and badly-designed AI and market it as “progress.” Burn all this with fire, and torch this idiotic rhetoric. Energy efficiency is elegance. Carbon is a thing. Never surrender agency to pseudoscientific theories or thought-terminating clichés.