Joined May 2015
- Tweets 13,964
- Following 365
- Followers 193
- Likes 22,664
2,086 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
12 Jul 2025
IF YOU CAN'T DEFEND YOUR BELIEFS YOU SHOULDN'T BE HOLDING THEM
1
2
515
May 31
Graham Platner haters, lets make a deal. We'll concede that affairs are disqualifying for primaries and say that Platner should be voted against in the democratic primary for Maine Senate if you say that Gavin Newsom should be voted against in the 2028 Presidential primary. Deal?
1
68
May 20
Interactions like this legitimately make me lose faith in humanity. Someone is indisputably proven to be objectively wrong on something, but continues to double down on their false belief and shut down the conversation.
We're hopeless as a society if proven truths cant prevail.
73
May 20
Crazy thing about Rabb's victory: he would have won in a 2-person race. It wasn't just the establishment vote-splitting that lead him to victory.
He'd easily pick up at >5.3% in a 1-on-1.
1
39
May 20
If it was Rabb vs Street, the >5% from Stanford's supporters would come from her campaigning as a progressive on domestic issues (M4A and Abolish ICE).
If Rabb vs Stanford, the >5% from Street's support would be for the fact that his voters valued political experience.
27
May 19
Lmfao @PhillyGov blocked me for this
May 19
It's actually the Street campaign who broke the law. It's illegal to staple campaign signs to telephone polls. @GoodVibePolitik was doing a public service by removing those illegal signs 😁
141
May 18
Highest in spending.
Highest in his opponent's internal polls.
Highest in the betting markets (fuck gambling btw).
Highest in search interest.
Highest in volunteers.
This is Chris Rabb's election to win. #pa03
5
259
May 14
No, this account is over 10 years old. Maybe shut up about politics or make your account private if you don't want strangers challenging you on your political statements.
May 12
So, I blocked you and you created another account to respond? Seriously? Maybe I should just lock the whole thread. This is annoying.
48
Apr 29
It should honestly be disqualifying for a candidate running for office to disable replies. If you can't stand up to Twitter users, how are you gonna stand up to Trump? #PA03
51
hog retweeted
18 Jul 2025
MAGAs: “if the embarassing stuff is real, why didn’t Biden release it?”
So you’re saying that if Biden released something, and Trump said it was fake, you would believe the Biden administration over Trump?
The conspiratorial worldview is unfalsifiable. Nothing can shake it.
58
134
1,627
40,369
17 Jul 2025
Wish i was back in grade school so I could sit during the national anthem. I stood every time like an indoctrinated bootlicker
1
1
69
17 Jul 2025
Schrodinger's Zohran:
Simultaneously "somebody who's going to bring about the fall of NYC by implementing totalitarian communism and Sharia Law"
But also
"An inexperienced kid who won't be able to get anything done and is just tricking voters with false promises he can't achieve"
2
103
17 Jul 2025
Even Cuomo's pathetic propaganda bot he paid for believes in Schrodinger's Zohran 😂
53
9 Jul 2025
Twitter is completely devoid of value. Every reply to @KyleKulinski tweets slamming the right is "but you didn't say anything when dems did this bad thing" (a 2 second google search can verify he actually did), or just calling him a slur. Why does anyone still use this app?
2
2
169
13 Jul 2025
Obviously its not just him, all the right has to when someone points out horrible shit Trump does is deflect to Democrats because they cant defend it. He's just a pundit I'm very familiar with and know was critical during the Biden and Obama administrations
53
12 Jul 2025
@grok is there a reasonable rationale for why some believe the ICJ may find Israel guilty of genocide in the future, such as statements of genocidal intent by Israeli leaders?
1
106
12 Jul 2025
It took too long to reply to the tweet. He's his answer. It's yes. Its answer of "no Israel isnt committing a genocide" was on the basis of a verdict in the ICJ not being reached yet. Its like saying "no Luigi Mangione didnt commit murder" because his trial is ongoing
2
141
hog retweeted
11 Jul 2025
Why can't people just admit that they eat meat because they enjoy it and there are no ecological or moral arguments in favor
6
12
355
5,047
hog retweeted
10 Jul 2025
becoming clear that when folks say "the left" and especially "the online left" that it doesn't really point to any coherent existing entity other than a collection of various people and posts they've collected in their mind.
67
366
4,269
94,547
10 Jul 2025
95% I call out don't reply and are likely bots. The 5% who do will repeatedly move the goalpost, I'll keep proving them wrong, and when backed into a corner, they'll just say they don't care. Why do I bother with this god forsaken app? Why do these fucks not care about truth?
2
1
78
10 Jul 2025
Here's 2 examples of the 5% who disregard facts and refuse to ever admit they're wrong. Worse than the bots honestly.
1
1
57