Who's launching an NFT collection? If you're launching something Unique like Normies, NPC, Gloobs, or Heraldia Drop in my dms I wanna support you I'll give you a voice I LOVE NFTs!

x.com/i/status/2064981973660… NFTs can't really be dead as long as art exists. The technology may evolve, change names, or adopt new mechanisms, but it can never truly die. What is dead is the old NFT model. is one of the few launchpads that has genuinely addressed the underlying issues that have prevented NFTs from reaching their full potential.

This steady teddy NFT which sold for $25k 1yr ago is now worth $17 today yhh NFTs are ded……

Bitcoin won't be "dead" for too long. Don't panic, in large friendly letters.

The old model of NFTs might be. The next cycle won't belong to collections built purely on speculation. It'll belong to projects that create real value for holders and give collectors a reason to stay. exactly what @LiquidNftMarket solved. You really really need to check out NFT's collection over there. liquidnfts.finance/bnb/colle…

how to 100x with NFTs: keep 100% of your money and don't buy them

I want to share some observations about two strategies in NFTs — and investing in general. Strategy #1 — Buying the pump. I see this all the time. People enter a project without really understanding it because the price is going up. A good example was Heraldia. People were sweeping everything in sight. Some were paying big money for rare NFTs. I did it myself. I bought what was ranked as the #1 rarity NFT, and literally an hour later it became #25. Then the pump happened. Some people sold for a profit. Others held on and eventually sold at a loss after the hype faded. The problem with this strategy is that everyone is chasing the next 10x, and those gains may never come. Strategy #2 — Averaging down. Even if you entered using Strategy #1, you can still protect your investment. That's what I call it: protecting the investment. Using Heraldia as an example, I bought more during the correction. Not at the absolute bottom — I was traveling at the time and couldn't follow the market closely. But even so, my average entry is now below the current floor after a roughly 40% correction. As a result, I feel comfortable holding the project. But the longer I spend in NFTs, the more I wonder: Maybe Strategy #1 is actually better? If the price isn't doing what you expected, you take a small loss, preserve capital, and move on. Sometimes I think that if I had followed that approach more often, I probably would have saved tens of thousands of dollars in NFTs alone. So I'm genuinely curious about your opinion. Which strategy do you think is better? 1️⃣ Buy and exit quickly if the thesis doesn't play out? 2️⃣ Average down and lower your cost basis? Or is the truth somewhere in the middle? 👀 RAW = Real Always Wins. 🫡

I paid 14k for NFTs over the past two years and now all together are worth $220 . . . Let’s bring it back 😈 Watch what patience and conviction does ✨

How Xeet Cards Collapsed: - Xeet launched Creator Cards as NFTs tied to: - squads - creators - engagement - tournaments - The Inf@-Fi narrative was booming at that time - Some holders were up 2x-3x in the hype phase - Xeet then encouraged users to migrate their cards from Abstract to MegaETH - Move to MegaETH and earn more rewards - MegaETH's Terminal farming program - Then X began breaking down on InfoFi applications and engagement farming. - Campaigns slowed down - The InfoFi narrative started dying - MegaETH's Terminal program ended - The primary reason to keep the cards vanished. - No major new campaigns arrived - Holders started selling the cards - Cards that were once heavily accumulated, - Now it began trading for less than $1.