🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

I'm speaking at 4:20pm at the Kawaii stage today at @NFCsummit! Live Forever on Bitcoin. See you there, and come say hi. It'll be nice to hang out.

Cool Stuff, metaverse on Bitcoin 🟧🔥

This is awesome, bitcoin metaverse is heating up for good, legends

Hope you locked in your Bitmaps🟧 because Bitverse is going live soon! Not just DMT-UNAT #Biminers Integration, All lands are #BITMAPS! Build your dream world and interact with the soon launching JUNGL Bitverse

🟧 BitmapSunset is live. 🟧 The entire Bitcoin blockchain, rendered as a city. Fully on-chain, forever. 🟧 Explore #ordinals. Build on your #bitmap. ordinals.com/content/d34d9f4… 🌇 Own a billboard in the multiverse. ord-dropz.xyz/secondary/coll…

Node syncing.. @ARKAiDio

🔥🔥 more Multiplayer

70 blocks... 📡#Bitmap

Did you know, there are examples of multiple bitmap districts inscribed on the same sat? This is because there was never a condition specifying that the sat should be unique, and it's what indexers have been running with since. Automated inscribers sometimes use the same sat for multiple attempts to inscribe a bitmap, and this leads to them getting multiple, but on the same sat. It's an interesting edge case, as it means these districts are intrinsically linked and cannot be separated. If you send one, you send them all. If I were to design bitmap again from scratch today, I would make sure it can't be on an existing Bitmap sat, however I can't do that so it is what it is. However, it leads to an edge case in signal theory, which I've had to come to terms with. If you signal from one of these bitmap sats, one signal may amount to multiple, based on how many districts are on the sat. The obvious problem is that you might want to signal independently from each district, not one signal for multiple districts. This could be a little more problematic for districts that span multiple hoods, where the district signalled is outside the range of the district you are signalling. We have to go with it for now. It's the way the cookie crumbles. I cannot make changes to a consensus that holds so much weight by myself. However, one path is that we can raise this question as one of the first democratic issues of bitmap. It is possible that we can fix this edge case. It will not be too difficult to do this for all future districts from the point the decision is made. However, doing this retroactively will invalidate some districts, and validate other previously invalid ones. This will fix the issue where one send of a bitmap is actually a send of multiples, so the benefits of making this change may outweigh the drawbacks. The realistic case is that we index both realities, and let consensus emerge from indexer and product adoption. But I think we can also raise it as a referendum type situation within the signal, so we can see what version of Bitmap the community would rather see. It could become the first real test of our ability to collectively make decisions on serious issues that may affect Bitmappers and the integrity of the standard, but also, the first time Bitmappers get to decide individually which version is the one they support. The first true bitmap fork! Ultimately, products that run bitmap indexers (marketplaces, Metaverses) will have to choose one version, and currently the default indexing is that multiple bitmaps on sats are okay. Note. Things will stay the same for 99.99% of the bitmap index. I'll leave this here for now, but I wanted to start the conversation now, so you are all aware of the situation, and maybe soon after the signal starts, we will raise the issue in a town hall space and move towards inscribed proposals or acts for people to signal one way or the other.

“bitmap is dead” “ordinals are dead” “jungl is down” meanwhile we were cooking silently 🧑‍🍳 land. infra. bitverse. all loading. you’ll realize it wasn’t dead… you were just early to leave.

You can play whatever game you like, so long as you don't speak for other people, as in using the word "we" when you mean "I".

GM! Don’t be fooled… everything is converging into a single place Bitcoin is freedom and as we all know, freedom is priceless! You might want to start questioning: what is money at its core? What if things shift and begin to be priced in Bitcoin? Imagine someone wants to sell something essential but only accepts payment in Bitcoin Today, the Bitcoin value is mostly measured in fiat currency terms, it faces fluctuations and some distorted perceptions but those who understand the true vision won’t be caught off guard when the tables turn Again, Bitcoin is freedom and freedom is priceless! Make sure you truly understand this, keep it spinning in your head until it becomes really, really clear and call that the breaking point, cause this will break everything you think you know about the freedom in the near future.

BITMAP SIGNAL THEORY for HOODS and SECTORS At block 945,000, counting begins. Hood → Seats (2016 blocks) Sector → Elect Capital (210,000 blocks) At difficulty adjustments, we count. At halvings, we score. ordinals.com/inscription/d9a…

Today, we are excited to announce a new Open Source tool – The Bitmap Renderer With Magic Eden going down, we needed a new source of truth for Bitmap block transaction images. We decided to build it and Open Source it for the community. Access the tool and help us build at: github.com/ordinals-wallet/b…

Hey @Satflow wen Bitmaps? 👀👀

Amazing 👏👏