I love LINK and I’ve been DCA for years, average price $17.74 but damn the wait is starting to kill me. I can’t even imagine a price that’ll make it worth it in the end anymore.

gas fees to zero?

" $LINK marine being escorted out of "serious" conversations by "serious" ethereans" or "LMAO" - circa 2019 - colourized

The UK social media ban for under-16s will be circumvented by Nostr, @GrapheneOS, @mullvadnet, @torproject and Linux. Get in touch if you need help.

For all the shit I give the crypto industry, we are just getting started and we are going to take over the world

I have started a religion in the UK called Gunism. A core belief of ours is that we should carry firearms and are therefore religiously exempt from any law prohibiting us Who wants to join?

So many ways to make money in this world and my dumbass picked memecoins

So I've gotten a bunch of counter-arguments here that I think have made me dramatically more bearish about ETH. The market seems to agree: ETH hit an ATH in the 4000s in 2021, recovered only to that same level in 2025, but has fallen back down and is not recovering. BTC got into the low 60k range in 2021, then hit the 120s in 2025, and now sits at roughly $77k, well above the 2021 ATH, and vastly outperforming ETH over that timeframe. Why? If you don't think there will be a future link to ETH collecting fees, you are essentially saying ETH will have value because people want to own it, and they want to own it because it has value. This is a fundamentally circular argument. The idea that they are valued by "the economies they enable" is simply not going to be true over the long run; power is valued by the cost of generation and relative other uses of capital, not by the size of the "economy it enables", otherwise electricity would be the most expensive thing in the world. I propose most of ETH's current value is from people who believed the network will grow to become a significant part of the financial future and that ETH itself will somehow be able to collect fees, rents, or other value in the form of accrual to ETH in that world. If that's not true, then it's an open question why the token has much value at all? It probably shouldn't! If it's just some sort of very low cost fee thing without clear value accrual, it should be valued like electricity: pure marginal supply and demand, which also means ETH needs to definitely drive way, way, way more activity and way, way, way more consumer adoption, so the recent EF proposals are a negative. In the case of BTC, it's clear that value comes from a psychological belief in the monetary premium, though also worth noting that the only asset that has sustained that belief over time in the history of man is gold. BTC has not been trading well as a chaos hedge, and some are starting to revisit this thesis (see @mcuban) and I would also take that as signal. Put differently: if your value thesis for crypto is that it's going to re-write the fundamental laws of economics and investing, I'm going to bet on those and not the price of the token.

If Jony Ive was still at Apple this would be a hit, to sell for $600k when every EV loses an absurd amount of money in a relatively short timeframe and the design being wack is an embarrassment to Ferrari

the ferrari luce is probably really sick if you love cock and are retarded

Looks like $Link will go live with SWIFT this June. John Pouderoyen said 1st half 2026 - & June’s the end of the 1st half

this is tempting @JohnRic95657171

Anon, do your bags have exposure to DTCC, one of the world's largest and most important financial market infrastructures, launching their own chain (Collateral Appchain) in Q4 of this year? The ticker is $LINK.

Citibank says $LINK may be bigger than Bitcoin

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senate Banking Committee officially advances post nut clarity act

JUST IN: The U.S. Senate Banking Committee voted to advance the CLARITY Act to the Senate floor.

I'll make generational wealth with $WOJAK

$wojak 8J69