When someone is killed, why is the first instinct for some people to explain, rationalize, or contextualize the killing rather than acknowledge the loss of life?
Whether it’s Trayvon Martin, George Floyd, Iryna Zarutska, Breonna Taylor, Henry Nowak, Charlie Kirk, Ahmaud Arbery, Austin Metcalf, or others, the details of each case differ. The politics differ. The circumstances differ. But the fact that they were victims of murder remain the same, and at the center of every one of these stories is a human being who is dead.
We can debate the evidence. We can discuss criminal liability, self-defense claims, police conduct, motives, and media coverage. Those are all legitimate conversations.
What I don’t understand is the impulse to treat a death as acceptable simply because you dislike the victim, disagree with their choices or something they said, or support the person responsible.
If your first reaction to a killing is to look for reasons the victim deserved it, perhaps it’s worth asking yourself why.
Justice requires facts. Humanity requires empathy. Neither should depend on whose side you’re on.