I don't have to pretend anyone is the opposite sex in order to tolerate their existence. Why do you?

Joined June 2023
660 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
2
13
32
2,885
Unlike “female,” trans IS a label that creates its own oppression. It has no coherent definition, so does not serve to describe. It has two main functions: 1) To tell children & psychologically vulnerable adults who don’t conform to sexist expectations that they were born wrong, & turn them into lifelong patients/profit points. Stop calling them trans, end their oppression. 2) To demand membership in a sacred caste for men who claim the label, then allow them to indulge their oppression fetish when they are treated just like all other men. Stop calling them trans, stop indulging their oppression fetish.
3
37
“You are reducing women to their reproductive organs.” This is a deliberate attempt to conflate the two meanings of the word “define,” a) to describe, and b) to limit, in order to imply that merely describing femaleness in humans somehow reduces our humanity. This is, of course, absurdly misogynistic. There is nothing shameful or reductive about femaleness: every person who ever lived has been “of woman born.” And every woman who ever gave birth or didn’t was fully human, with memberships in other categories such as nationality, race, ethnicity, economic class, religion, sexual orientation, profession, and personality type, and as unique as every other human, with personal histories, interests, talents, dreams, desires, doubts, fears, regrets and accomplishments of her very own. Approximately 4 billion of us on planet Earth just now, all female, and all fully human. Including your mom. And it is, of course, instructive that femaleness is the only human characteristic which fauxgressives insist reduces us by the mere naming of it. They do not, for example, propose to end racism by forbidding black people from calling themselves “black.” But it is also important to note that while insisting femaleness is either too complex & mysterious to define or too disgusting to name, trans activists insist we call ourselves “cis women,” as differentiated from “trans women.” Which is to say, female ladybrains and male ladybrains. The same goes for “trans men” and “cis men”: Female dudebrains and male dudebrains. Their own categories rely on the difference between male and female, so that differentiation must not be as impossible or oppressive as they claim. And just in case there is any doubt left: In many countries around the world, women have gone from being treated as property to being treated as full citizens, without ever having to pretend that we aren’t female. In other countries, women have gone from being full citizens to being treated like chattel, and again, our femaleness was never in question. Our femaleness has never been the problem. Men’s desire to maintain access to and control over our female bodies has always been the problem. If our bodies were so problematic, why would men, including those who claim to be us, be so obsessed with them? We cannot advocate for the full humanity of female people if femaleness is un-nameable. And that is precisely why trans activists wish to make it so.
8
30
97
1,419
Why Lie retweeted
AMERICANS! Stand up for vulnerable women & girls. HUD is accepting public comments right now on a rule revision to make HUD housing programs, including shelters, single-sex. Please write a short comment letting them know you support the revision here: regulations.gov/commenton/HU… All you need to write is a short statement. The following example is from @DIAGdemocrats: I support HUD’s proposed Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Revisions. HUD-funded programs should be able to maintain sex-based policies for single-sex shelters and facilities where privacy, safety, and dignity are at stake. This is especially important for vulnerable women and girls, including survivors of violence and homelessness. Protecting women’s spaces is compatible with treating everyone with dignity and compassion.

7
33
82
2,175
Yet again the “sex & gender are different” crowd takes offense when we recognize & name reproductive categories. Acknowledging the fact that you are male does not “reduce you to a political argument” any more than it reduces the 4 billion other male people on the planet to a political argument. You are no less of a threat NOR any less human than they are. Facts are not arguments, they are not dehumanizing, and they are not stigmatizing. They are simply facts. In this case, a fact that applies to FOUR BILLION OTHER PEOPLE. You want us to pretend you belong to a special new category of people, a sacred caste. We’re telling you you’re just as human, no more and no less, than anybody else. You want to frame that as oppression, because you are a narcissist with an oppression fetish. A male narcissist with an oppression fetish.
I’m a trans woman. Not a “biological male who identifies as female.” That language isn’t neutral — it reduces my whole life to one political argument and makes it easier to frame me as a threat instead of a person. That isn’t objectivity. It’s stigma.
2
2
13
368
Men are *different* from, not “less than” women. If that deflates your oppression boner, good.
Replying to @Dragonpanties
i cannot see why, as a woman, i would exclude myself from women’s spaces to do so would be admitting that i see myself as less than, and that simply isn’t true hope you understand 🙏🏳️‍⚧️
2
18
270
This was the scene in Bangladesh as Islamic militants stormed a medical school classroom, weapons in hand, yelling: “Educating women is haram!” Islam is the enemy of civilization.

1,061
12,918
27,759
383,184
What kind of person do you have to be to equate being gay with being born in the wrong body? A homophobe.
1
27
505
Why Lie retweeted
Lin Farley, Lesbian Rights Rally 1974 June 23 Remember Storme DeLarverie Lesbian Pride 🏳️‍🌈
15
160
506
14,786
Imagine demanding we redefine the words "man" & "woman" for 100% of the population on behalf of 1% of the population, then having the gall to post this.
1
2
6
95
Why Lie retweeted
I walked through the red light district in Brussels today and it was one of the most horrible things I’ve ever seen. Young women standing behind glass while groups of men banged on the windows and haggled over them like products. Most of the women appeared to be Asian or Eastern European. The men crowding around them were overwhelmingly African or Muslim men, many still dressed in Islamic clothes. Anyone who looks at that and sees “empowerment” is sick in the head. I don’t know the circumstances of every woman there, but it was impossible to witness it and not wonder how many were there through coercion, desperation, trafficking, or poverty. Nothing about it looked liberating. Putting it lightly it was dehumanising. The women treated like livestock by the most depraved men I’d ever seen. This is Brussels. The capital of the European Union. The place where leaders gather, policies are written, and grand speeches about progress are made. Yet just outside the conference halls and beneath the glass towers, this is happening in plain sight. I only hope Ireland never comes to resemble it.
280
1,843
10,552
370,383
This is the most explosive story you’ll read all month, but the mainstream media won’t say a word about it. An anonymous researcher has created a database of donations made to LGBTQ causes by over 1,600 major corporations, including all of the Fortune 500 companies and every corporation given a score by the 2022-2023 HRC Corporate Equality Index, from 2022-2024. These donations, given to more than 2,500 separate groups and beneficiaries, add up to over a BILLION dollars. “Gender affirming care,” however, is a $6 billion/year industry — two years’ investment recouped 6x over, year after year after year. Everything we’ve suspected is true, and here’s the proof. Gender ideology is indeed a creation of corporate greed, meant to sucker people - especially children - into a lifetime of medicalization, thus creating a steady stream of income for shareholders. Thousands of little donations - at an average of $400k - to small “grassroots” organizations deliberately created the false impression that gender ideology was a legitimate civil rights movement. I don’t know about y’all, but I’ve never heard of a civil rights movement with 1,600 corporate sponsors before. 1,600 major corporations, including the world’s 500 largest, handed these people more than a BILLION dollars from 2022-2024 — and they think they’re marginalized? That they’re vulnerable? They have used every last dollar of that money to oppress people who actually are vulnerable, whining the whole time that telling them “no” is violence. Look at them, with their corporate ideology that was cooked up in boardrooms to maximize profits, repeating whatever strategic lie the advertising department came up with last week. What is it this time? We’ve already heard that “trans girls” get periods, that hormones make your feet shrink, that there’s no physical difference between men and women, and that women’s sports should be taken over by men because not enough people care about them — so what’s next on the List of Obvious Nonsense? If you watch closely, you can see the “unrelated” accounts all swing into action repeating the new lie. When they don’t have anything in particular, they resort to repetition, knowing that some people come to believe the things they hear over and over again, even when they objectively know better. The researchers also included a sample of the DEI policies enacted by corporations, although they were “too numerous to list in full.” This database makes one thing very clear. DEI initiatives undertaken by major corporations were not a response to public pressure: rather, they were created to pressure the public. There is no massive pro-trans grassroots movement; it’s just a bunch of corporations funding a thin, loud layer of fanatics, bullying groups of uncertain people who think they’re doing the right thing. lgbtdatabase.com (reposted to clarify the time period covered by the database)

50
705
1,872
108,143
Why Lie retweeted
Jun 12
Elizabeth Warren's net worth is estimated at about $8 million (Quiver Quantitative ~$7.1M in 2025; OpenSecrets/Forbes historical ~$7-12M range from disclosures, books, retirement accounts, and home equity). Using the same comparison method as the Musk post (median US household income ~$83k), a typical American household would need to work roughly 96 years — or about 35,000 days — to accumulate that level of wealth. Her wealth is well below the $50M threshold in the wealth tax she has proposed.
207
649
11,134
378,000
Why Lie retweeted
“puberty blockers” prevent the physical and psychological development which allowed me and many others to eventually overcome adolescent gender dysphoria. they block the cure.
8
65
390
5,172
Why Lie retweeted
Hello all. A quick update from me. My sex screen assay is progressing well. I promised rapid: I can detect SRY from a cheek swab in about 30 minutes. I am currently testing whether I can drop it to 10 minutes without compromising reliability. I promised cheap: The current cost per assay is about £2. I am currently testing whether I can drop this to below the pound line, and it’s very promising. I promised accessible: The assay could be run by any grassroots sports coach, school nurse, and my Mum. I promised on-site: This is where my lab efforts are currently focussed. I’ve always held “from the UK to Uganda” as a principle, and ensuring easy deployment is crucial. I’m currently learning a lot of materials science… The other main push is setting up various blinded, larger-scale tests. This will require lots of form filling. If anyone wants to help me hit my final budget target, my crowdfunder is here.
Every girl deserves a fair chance in sports. Developing a rapid, low-cost sex screening method can protect women’s categories and promote equality. Your support can make this vision a reality. Please share and consider donating to help fund this crucial research! gofund.me/632105634
127
918
3,514
171,478
Why Lie retweeted
"Sissy porn made me trans" - Andrew Long Chu, who took the name "Andrea" to mock anti-porn feminist Andrea Dworkin He describes how porn use escalates due to desensitization, demanding more extreme content, leading to erectile dysfunction, and in his case, castration fetishism
8
76
252
6,946
Why Lie retweeted
Remember girls given testosterone during their youth in the 70s & 80s for illegal sporting advantage have all struggled with their health, several died very young, many had disabled children. We don’t need more experiments. Do NO harm.
A year-long inquiry into the WellBN clinic found that 78 young patients were potentially harmed after puberty-blocking drugs and cross-sex hormones were prescribed without proper checks. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c932…
13
591
2,637
35,089
And yet, the Free Palestine crowd shows no interest in Freeing Palestine from Hamas
If the UN felt compelled to say this, imagine how bad the situation must be…
3
26
"Sex is complicated & arbitrary & nobody understands it. The only reason to want words for male & female people is a hatred of trans people. Also I, a trans person, demand you sort people into categories dependent on sex differentiation: Cis women for female ladybrains Trans women for male ladybrains Trans men for female dudebrains Cis men for male dudebrains Female ladybrains oppress male ladybrains, so female ladybrains must be forced to prioritize the happiness of male ladybrains. But also there is no difference between female & male ladybrains. We will make no such demand that male dudebrains prioritize the happiness of female dudebrains; in fact female dudebrains only matter when they can be used against female ladybrains, but nevermind that they're female because what does that word even mean and we totes don't care. I'm all about the science, me."
Replying to @girlsbian_
anyway the moral of the story is that sex is a complicated and ultimately arbitrary social category and the only reason transphobes bother pretending to understand it is because of an irrational hatred for trans people
2
7
54
1,369
Why Lie retweeted
Replying to @mournddmal
there's a smaller proportion of people who don't claim the queer label because they're holding onto it as a slur, but i've never personally met someone who has held that opinion- it's almost always what i explained in the img
1
1
7
201
Another delicate flower who could never be safe in the Gents.
"My name is Lauren."
2
3
47