๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Helped 900 companies stop competing on price (fixed positioning). Marketed 400 courses. Ran multiple agencies.

Joined February 2014
320 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
29 Mar 2023
Dear Course Creator You could - create a marketing strategy - find your audience - research your market - fix your positioning - create uniqueness - connect all the tech - revamp your sales page - create and run ads - run ads - write emails or hire a marketer
36
30
341
300,640
Anyone miss the good old days of $2k per month services? clients paid you little you paid workers little delivered little everyone was left slightly dissatisfied and the world went on PS: AI disrupted that
31
Sometimes the market requires a fluffer
the market always tells you what works most founders just refuse to listen
1
65
Then you add meta cli And upload 100 creatives in 20 minutes Would have taken a full day before
For the last 1.5 weeks, I've been building a creative production pipeline for Meta Ads. Today with different formats (1:1 and 9:16) and multiple localizations I generated 900 videos. Around 50 of them were actually unique creatives. A year ago this would've cost thousands of dollars and at least 2 weeks of work. What AI still does poorly (for me): - UGC. It's still not good enough. The only way I've managed to make it work is when the avatar stays silent. Then there's at least a chance people think it's real. - ideation. I still haven't figured out how to make AI consistently brainstorm truly good ad concepts. What AI does surprisingly well: - animated ads (which I prefer anyway โ€“ in my experience they often outperform UGC) - subtitles - editing and stitching footage together - localizations - uploading everything to Google Drive An incredible amount of production work can already be automated.
57
Tom Libelt retweeted
For the last 1.5 weeks, I've been building a creative production pipeline for Meta Ads. Today with different formats (1:1 and 9:16) and multiple localizations I generated 900 videos. Around 50 of them were actually unique creatives. A year ago this would've cost thousands of dollars and at least 2 weeks of work. What AI still does poorly (for me): - UGC. It's still not good enough. The only way I've managed to make it work is when the avatar stays silent. Then there's at least a chance people think it's real. - ideation. I still haven't figured out how to make AI consistently brainstorm truly good ad concepts. What AI does surprisingly well: - animated ads (which I prefer anyway โ€“ in my experience they often outperform UGC) - subtitles - editing and stitching footage together - localizations - uploading everything to Google Drive An incredible amount of production work can already be automated.
5
1
15
2,885
Let me summarize this You think AI executes
It's not sexy to say, but most of AI transformation has nothing to do with AI. There are 10 steps in the sequence of making an internal process or external product AI-native. Only 1 step is AI, and ironically, the other 9 steps are the far harder part. Step 1: Identify the problem - find the manual process worth automating. turn your brain off autopilot & turn on your "suck meter". - funny enough, your company becomes more efficient just by mapping out your processes even if you don't introduce AI. Step 2: Understand the workflow - Map how people actually work today. grab an 8.5x11 piece of paper or @excalidraw and create a flow chart of the workflow from beginning to end. - Least sexy part, but generally where the people driving transformation (FDE, GTM engineer, etc) should spend the majority of their time. - Before you reimagine a process you have to become an expert in that process. Which means you either need to have the business context yourself or absorb it through osmosis (See what @DBredvick did at @vercel) Step 3: Collect the data - Gather sample inputs, documents, edge cases - Example: for my content machine ai workflow, I gathered past slack messages/notion transcripts to test automated ideation & I pulled past X/linkedin posts to build .md files of my content voice Step 4: Build the prototype [The AI Part] - Whether its engineer-led or SME-led the goal is to test your hypothesis that there's a better way of doing things for yourself as customer zero. Don't worry about code cleanliness, don't worry about scalability, just worry about proving there's a there there. Step 5: Test & iterate - Validate with real users and edge cases - Before you take the process from single player (only you using it) to multiplayer (many users), you want to beat it up with as many rounds of work & feedback edge cases as possible. Turning every process into a self-improving loop before scaling is key. Step 6: Integrate with systems - Point-in-time data is good for testing the workflow, but live data is necessary before going into production. - Example: for my content machine, i'm hooked up to notion/gmail/slack for content ideation & i'm hooked up to X & Linkedin to post content once it's ready to go. Step 7: Roll out & train - Whether the new process lives on a live link, on GitHub or an internal library, next step is hand-holding your peers/users through the onboarding process of your new workflow/product. Step 8: Drive adoption - It's actually pretty simple (just not easy). Introduce a new workflow that saves someone a lot of time and integrates with their already existing behavior so they don't have to deal with re-education. - Embed the workflow in your culture where adoption is tracked, ideas & feedback are celebrated, and new/creative use cases become social currency in your business. Step 9: Empower contribution - Treat your new process like an opensource project. Allow users to become contributors. Whether they are literally pushing code or are simply empowered to add ideas/feedback to a kanban board that gets serviced by engineers, make everyone feel like a builder. Step 10: Measure & capture value - Everyone is ROI obsessed atm. If you're in the experimental phase of AI adoption in your company, fuck ROI. The goal is to empower people to throw a lot of shit at the wall & see what's worth focusing on. You don't need to be scientific during this process. Intuition is more than enough in gauging what's working vs. not working. - If you're in the scale-up phase of AI in your business, and you need to realize hard ROI, you need to reskill employees attached to this process, undershoot your approved hiring roadmap, or measurably increase ACV/conversion rate/sales cycle speed.
41
I think this statement will go down in history coding is solved BUT debugging is not
26
Created a new tool to get keywords for apple ads their suggestions not so good the apps on the market just guessing too
20
All the smart people I know: AI models are really bad now especiallyl claud Retards on X: models are not the problem, skills are
40
after 37 pages and conditions met... about to test meta cli
12
the meta ads cli setup is about as bad as xcode install cli, setup app in dev account, go to business settings, assign system user to app, assign ads, assign pages, generate token wtf maybe should fire another 50k devs
1
48
I have ran my own benchmarks and old claude from 4.5 era used to come out ahead 4.7 and 4.8 regularly worst now
Seeing a number of benchmarks showing Opus is the best model for long-running work. Five tips for running Opus autonomously for hours/days: 1. Use auto mode for permissions, so Claude doesnโ€™t ask for approval 2. Use dynamic workflows, to have Claude orchestrate hundreds/thousands of agents to get a task done 3. Use /goal or /loop, to nudge Claude to keep going until itโ€™s done 4. Use Claude Code in the cloud, so you can close your laptop (easiest way is the desktop or mobile app) 5. Make sure Claude has a way to self-verify its work end to end: Claude in Chrome browser extension for web, iOS/Android sim MCP for mobile, a way to start the full web server or service for backend work
1
99
This is the way
2
79
Not the experience I'm having Top Tough Reasoning Leaderboard If you have two cats and one leaves does one cat remain? Claude: Yes yey
40
Takes 5 years to figure that out?
33
Claude reviews Codex = this is over-engineered Codex reviews Claude = this is stupid Claude reviews Claude = this is suspicious Codex review Codex = I'm going to drift into a different direction
53
We are reaching AGI
69
Any niche you follow on here After a bit you start seeing the circle jerk The same few accounts "low key" (but not really if you pay attention) promoting each other
1
44
building variations of influencer takes minutes now
48