🎬 PEDDI REVIEW ⭐ 2.75/5
The biggest plus of Peddi is Ram Charan.
The biggest minus of Peddi is also Ram Charan.
Before the review, let me tell you a small story.
There's a cricketer whose team really needs him. So he works hard — changes his body, gives his heart to the game, and on match day he plays a brilliant century. But the team still loses. Why? He didn't fail. But cricket is a team game. One man's century can't win the match if the bowlers don't do their job.
Peddi is exactly that story.
Charan gives 100%, sometimes more. But the whole film orbits him alone. Only two other characters get room to breathe; the rest are furniture around the star. In that imbalance, the film stops telling a story and becomes a showcase — less "here is Peddi," more "see how hard Charan worked to become Peddi." You can admire effort, but you can't connect to it. Connection comes from the character, not the actor's hard work.
The screenplay hurts more — scenes sit disconnected, so the emotion keeps snapping. Appalasoori (Jagapathi Babu) lands a powerful pre-climax beat, but by the second half, where it's needed most, the film has let it evaporate. Setup there, connection gone.
A character-design flaw too: you're sold a sportsman meant to inspire today's youth — then shown him kissing a girl without consent. That one beat fractures the connection. Inspiration and that act don't sit in the same man, and the audience feels the seam.
THE VERDICT, PLAINLY
Peddi isn't a bad film. But it's not what we expected from Charan Buchi Babu Sana. The story has ₹1000cr potential — the raw material is that good. The problem is the cooking. The dish has taste, but you leave unsatisfied. A one-time watch, and the best reason to make it is Charan's performance.
PERFORMANCES
Appalasoori — Jagapathi Babu: maybe a career best. Thirty years chasing a railway halt for a village not even on the map — he makes the ache real. One doubt: was the makeover even needed? The impact's in the actor, not the look. A few of his scenes feel trimmed too.
Gournaidu — Shiva Rajkumar: a real highlight. He's wonderful, and I enjoyed every scene. A character the director clearly designed with care and purpose — one of the few where writing and performance pull the same way.
Achiyamma — Janhvi Kapoor: the writing's weakest point. A local leader's daughter in a 1990s village, yet handed a public exposing scene that fits neither the world nor the woman. Once belief breaks, the romance floats away. Janhvi's sincere; the role was never anchored.
Everyone else: present and competent — but no real impact. They occupy the frame without leaving a mark.
TECHNICAL
🎵 AR Rahman — songs good, BGM does real work and holds the film when the screenplay slips.
🎥 Rathnavelu — clean frames, the 90s rural look captured well.
🖥️ VFX — weak. Feels ~80% green screen and sets. You don't need a trained eye to catch it. For this budget, a real letdown.
Length: ~15 minutes could go. The political campaign track adds nothing and doesn't even close properly — trim it, give the space to Appalasoori.
Climax (no spoilers): could've been written better. No issue with Charan, only the writing. The ending the story deserved and the one it got aren't the same.
Direction — Buchi Babu Sana: vision, ambition and a strong story foundation are all there, but the execution doesn't match. Scenes drift, the wrong threads get trimmed, the scale slips from his grip. The Uppena director couldn't quite hold Peddi together.
FINAL WORD
Want a powerhouse Ram Charan performance? Go, enjoy it. I enjoyed it in bits — I love sports dramas. But keep expectations at zero. Walk in expecting a disaster, and you'll come out having enjoyed the parts that work.
⭐ 2.75/5
#Peddi #PeddiReview #RamCharan #BuchiBabuSana #JanhviKapoor #ShivaRajkumar #JagapathiBabu #ARRahman #Tollywood #PeddiMovie