Joined October 2015
1,528 Photos and videos
Daniel G. retweeted
The Judgment Fund isn’t a Trump invention. Congress created it in 1956. No judge sign-off required. Obama’s DOJ used it for “discrimination” farm payouts and steered leftovers to nonprofits that filed zero claims. DOJ paid Strzok and Page $2M from it too. Funny how it only became a scandal once Trump tapped it.
129
4,146
8,371
110,212
Daniel G. retweeted
Replying to @shipwreckedcrew
There is no way dozens of top lawyers representing hundreds of plaintiffs would have refrained for so many years from suing multiple rich Epstein “clients”, if such existed. To entertain this ridiculous theory is an insult to attorneys. 😉
3
7
80
1,649
Daniel G. retweeted
There is no “list”. There has never been a list. The “collection of names” came up in the Maxwell trial. There is an exhibit under seal and Maxwell explain what it was in the interview with Blanche. This has always been an invention of the plaintiffs’ lawyers in FL who have made millions keeping this fraud/grift alive via social media.
The whole point is that there's nothing to blow open. The last time that Massie read names on the House floor, he defamed four random civilians who had nothing to do with Epstein other than being in a random police lineup with him. Massie was a fraud, a faker, and now he's done
41
460
2,195
90,293
Daniel G. retweeted
The whole point is that there's nothing to blow open. The last time that Massie read names on the House floor, he defamed four random civilians who had nothing to do with Epstein other than being in a random police lineup with him. Massie was a fraud, a faker, and now he's done
I’m begging @RepThomasMassie to go on the House floor asap & read all of the names in the #EpsteinFiles - you were a hero for survivors - you believed them & fought for them. Your actions were brave & heroic. Now pls blow the whole thing wide open. Thank you.
116
985
5,425
215,888
Daniel G. retweeted
Massie tweeted about Epstein a whopping three (3) times before 2025, which is three times more than the zero (0) times Ro Khanna mentioned Epstein before Trump took office in 2025. The sanctimony is a bit much given that their only interest in Epstein is using him to clout chase online.
My good friend @RepThomasMassie lost tonight. He lost because he had the guts to stand up to the Epstein class and against the war. He won voters under 45 by 30 points. Tonight, I say to this voters who feel rejected by Trump. We welcome you. Join our coalition to take on a rotten system and stand for the working class over the Epstein class. We will build a movement to stand for Team America.
63
449
1,846
45,398
Daniel G. retweeted
Massie removed real protections against pedophiles from HR 185 to get his grifty Epstein bill passed. Why didn’t he leave those in? Because he doesn’t care one whit about living breathing pedos or their current victims. Massie has done literally zero to help on that issue. Literally. Zero.
These are the new anti-human-trafficking proposals that Massie wants to ELIMINATE from HR 185, to be replaced with his grandstanding Epstein disclosure requirements. The proposed law WOULD HAVE enhanced federal penalties for preying upon youngsters near schools TODAY. Massie instead proposes to strike those provisions to place sole focus on investigating what Epstein might have done TWENTY YEARS AGO to now grownup women, who have already collected hundreds of millions of dollars in lawsuits and claims. Some champion of victims. Spare me the superhero bs.
1
17
33
2,246
Daniel G. retweeted
Don’t forget that Massie REMOVED anti-human-trafficking provisions from a bill to get his grifty Epstein law passed. And there has been no “client list”. Just grifting.
These are the new anti-human-trafficking proposals that Massie wants to ELIMINATE from HR 185, to be replaced with his grandstanding Epstein disclosure requirements. The proposed law WOULD HAVE enhanced federal penalties for preying upon youngsters near schools TODAY. Massie instead proposes to strike those provisions to place sole focus on investigating what Epstein might have done TWENTY YEARS AGO to now grownup women, who have already collected hundreds of millions of dollars in lawsuits and claims. Some champion of victims. Spare me the superhero bs.
1
11
27
1,220
Daniel G. retweeted
Notice the shifting goalposts. In South Carolina, it’s about having a black person in Congress. But in Tennessee, because the Democrat being booted is white and his probable GOP replacement is black, it’s suddenly not. The constant? Democrats in power. That’s all this is.
South Carolina, where the first shot of the civil war was fired, where 40 percent of those enslaved came through the Charleston port, is today engaged in an ugly recidivism to draw maps that will deny a Black person the chance to serve in Congress. The stakes could not be higher. Our political fight is not on a playground, but a moral battleground. We must stand for Black representation across the South.
74
1,239
6,583
101,935
Yes, a minor who was a day shy of her 18th birthday. Do you not know what pedophilia is? You think consensual sex with a 17 year old is the same as raping an 8 year old? Yes or no? Be very careful, pedo. You're treading dangerous ground here.
2
2
150
Got exposed as a pedo and then ran away. How long before your cowardly ass blocks me?
2
51
LMAO! Do you always fall for shit this easily or only pedo fiction stuff?
1
2
38
Where'd you go, pussy boy?
1
26
This is exactly what you say when the lawsuits hit and you’re suddenly a lot less excited about ‘discovery’ than you’ve been pretending to be.
299
744
6,040
76,861
Daniel G. retweeted
Yeah, he just got a Nazi death camp tattoo by mistake. And sympathized with Nazis by mistake. And made racist comments by mistake. And justified r*pe by mistake. But Elon Musk raised his hand that one time, so he’s totally a Nazi.
Replying to @BookerGWash
He’s not a Nazi
86
1,089
6,037
85,460
Daniel G. retweeted
We encourage any victim in attendance to walk over to the FBI office and make a statement about what they know and who they know abused them. That is how we can help them.
Epstein survivors are here in DC today to press for a full release of files by Trump Admin They’ll be on national mall… as Trump and some of the media have a black-tie dinner together
605
2,523
11,800
486,496
Daniel G. retweeted
Btw this interview 100% confirmed my theory that David French is merely a contrarian. Allie writes a book, “Toxic Empathy,” and French’s take is, “Actually, we need MORE empathy.” Not principled reaction or thoughtful reasoning. Just taking a contrarian position & then working it. This was evident when Allie pressed him. She pointed out that his criticism of her book was based on his own twisted definition of toxic empathy. He re-defined toxic empathy into a weak straw man toxic empathy, and then he beat the straw man. This is Frenchism, and once you see it you can’t unsee it. French begins with a contrary position (any issue) then invents arguments to sustain the contrary position. Talarico isn’t Christian? “Ahh, he’s the MOST Christian.” Drag Queens should stay away from kids? “Ahh, Drag Queens are a blessing of liberty.” Donald Trump is the lesser of two evils? “Ahh, Kamala Harris is actually quite conservative.” It’s the same schtick. Every. Single. Time.
New York Times writer David French joins me today on Relatable to debate pronouns, toxic empathy, James Talarico, voting for Kamala Harris, abortion, and so much more. This episode is out now. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or watch here: m.youtube.com/watch?v=KYPlrX…
39
70
660
30,293
Daniel G. retweeted
One of the key episodes in the Ukraine impeachment saga was that, just as the fake “whistleblower” came forward with second- and third-hand claims, Inspector General Atkinson secretly changed the process to allow hearsay complaints, whereas previously only first-hand accounts were permitted. So now we know that when Atkinson was confronted about it, his explanation was that it was all just a giant coincidence. The problem is that even if someone wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt, the fact that he concealed the change makes it obvious to anyone with two functioning brain cells that it wasn’t a coincidence at all.
33
527
1,371
56,651
Daniel G. retweeted
Blocking is a tool for the weak-minded.
85
2
84
89,102
Daniel G. retweeted
For the retards who don’t read past headlines
A new investigation has reportedly backed up evidence given by a woman who has accused Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was 13. trib.al/GvBSi5q
17
47
297
18,951
Daniel G. retweeted
Some squirrely white guy walking up to a bunch of black guys and telling them they are “foot soldiers of a fascist regime” is the absolute state of the modern left. Just beyond parody.

307
1,812
14,693
833,461
Daniel G. retweeted
The media: Trump had classified documents carelessly strewn all over Mar-a-Lago. Also the media: Trump meticulously curated classified documents to advance his business interests.
NEW: Trump had business motive for keeping classified documents, Jack Smith finds The special counsel’s team found Donald Trump held onto documents so secret only six people could legally review them — and believed his reason for doing so was personal financial gain. ms.now/news/trump-classified…
35
128
500
12,767
Daniel G. retweeted
Mar 25
This article cites one sentence in one memo written by someone in Jack Smith’s office in 2023 that said Trump may have business reasons for keeping the classified documents. That’s it. No mention of these “business interests.” Just a random thought by someone in Smith’s office. That was enough for them to make this post.
NEW: Trump had business motive for keeping classified documents, Jack Smith finds The special counsel’s team found Donald Trump held onto documents so secret only six people could legally review them — and believed his reason for doing so was personal financial gain. ms.now/news/trump-classified…
41
402
1,474
58,618