Raiden warned about AI censorship takeover plan !!! ⚡️⚡️⚡️ FULL VERSION [HD] ⚡️⚡️⚡️ 💎 youtu.be/-gGLvg0n-uY

Artwork is the product of human creative expression, that's what the word means. The value that one assigns to artwork is what is subjective. One can define objective criteria for ranking, but those criteria are defined by subjective preferences. You are making appeals to transcendental beauty in nature (e.g. sacred geometries) as evidence that artistic beauty is objective. I would argue that the beauty of the natural world is the creative expression of God. It is a reflection of God's incomprehensible perfection. Humans on the other hand, though we are Imago Dei, are fallen creatures. We are not perfect beings, therefore our artworks will not always embody transcendental perfect beauty when measured against the objectively supreme works of the almighty Lord. Our creative expressions are artwork nevertheless.

"why do you want to boycott us you [profane insult]?" because you're rude, and we don't want you to be able to buy food with our money.

"if you use Ai tools you're literally Hitler" Godwin's Law proven once again like clockwork: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1"

totally normal behavior

Hypothesis: There is a direct correlation between Anti-Ai sentiment and the inability to visualize things in the mind. It's common to see Anti-Ai people aggressively dismiss the idea that creating visual art is primarily about communicating an internal vision held by the artist. They will sometimes say things such as "the real art is the technical skill to create something" and that "the idea" is virtually worthless, often accusing people of being useless "ideas guys." In reality, the artist's vision is the most important and crucial part of both the creative process and the final artistic expression that others interact with. Without it, the expression devolves to nothing more than a showcase of craft and technical skill, such as a demonstration of the ability to draw straight lines, hold a paintbrush correctly, fret a chord, or operate a camera using an appropriate shutter speed. Art is about communication. It's about the artist transmitting their internal vision, audiation, and emotions to others via some medium. Anyone who does not understand that does not understand what art is. Expressions of craft and technical skill alone are not artwork, they are the means by which artwork can be manifested. This reality can best be seen at the level of the director, such as Hideo Kojima; someone who directs teams of craftsmen and other artists to create a large scale multimedia art piece that's intended to primarily reflect their inner vision. In the right hands, creative Ai tools can be used to manifest an artist's vision extremely effectively, including in ways that weren't possible before the tools existed. For people that can't visualize things in the mind due to physical lack of ability, the above is a completely alien concept. It's unknown to them because the capability is missing from their nervous system. Trying to explain to them what it's like to be able to hear and see entire worlds in your mind would be similar to trying to explain colors to someone who has never seen them before. You can try, but ultimately you can't transmit the experience to them. They're not capable of expressing visual artwork from within themselves, because they have nothing internally to express. At best they can develop the technical craft of expression, which they have come to mistake as "art." So that is why they become confused (and aggressive) when they're exposed to the idea that creative Ai software is just another set of tools in an emerging craft used for artistic expression. They can't see the apple.

college/university at this point is nothing more than paid voluntary daycare for talentless people who don't have the initiative to seek knowledge and skills on their own i learned more in 1 year studying subjects with an LLM than i did in all uni courses i've taken combined

Anti-Ai's response to this subject: - Demanding that users "prove their disability by posting medical documentation" - Stating that defending the rights of the disabled is "using the disabled as a shield to flood the market with slop" Impressively tone deaf.

Anti-Ai fears THE BOYCOTT LIST The irony is succulent. Their entire movement is focused on boycotting creators who use Ai tools And the instant we give them a taste of their own medicine, they recoil in abject fear. Looks like we're over the target.

Random people insulting one another online for arbitrary reasons is the cornerstone of X's business model. If it weren't for power users like me, this app wouldn't be able to pay its electric bills.

I emailed Valve/Steam last year to ask them about their "mandatory Ai use disclosure" policy. They never responded. They won't even explain the policy to developers so that it can be complied with, let alone why exactly they created it.

Reminder that Anti-Ai artists appeared alongside Adobe and Universal Music Group demanding that open source Ai tools be outlawed on copyright grounds. From 2023:

every thursday i create an Ai generated image of a different celebrity eating some kind of animal meat and then i physically mail it to PETA headquarters

oh no...not the database of anti-AI....please....have mercy on our souls

>tell them that advanced Ai tools give artists complete control >"umm akshually these tools i've never used can't do that" it's absolutely insane how Anti-Ai is incapable of absorbing new information

Anti-Ai demands that i use Ai to read his mind and replicate his imagination to "prove Ai can make art" LMFAO

You know, I've been thinking about this further, and it could potentially apply to any website that requires such disclosure, including those that actually ban AI content. Restricting such content could be discrimination under the ADA. That's kind of wild.

The Anti-Ai Counter-Boycott: A Proposal Anti-Ai is fundamentally a boycott movement. And they're not only boycotting our companies and products, but actively working to push policies in our industries to make it easier for them to boycott us or otherwise make it more difficult to operate. For example, Steam's irrational mandatory Ai use disclosure policy, which they don't just use to quietly boycott games, but also to actively harass the developers with bogus negative reviews and other actions off of the platform. Their boycott work extends also to the level of trying to influence the law. They are working with Disney's Copyright Alliance and companies like Adobe to lobby the government to outlaw the use of free, open source Ai models and tools on copyright grounds, which would force us to have to pay huge subscription fees to companies like Adobe in order to use their "copyright ethical Ai tools" instead. And to make matters worse, the proposed means by which enforcement of those regulations would be pursued involves unprecedented surveillance technology that will be used for far more than just controlling which Ai tools creators are allowed to use when developing commercial products. To put it simply, Anti-Ai is not only a threat to individual creative expression and small businesses, but to human freedom at global scale. I think maybe it's time we stop just complaining about this problem and take action. I propose a counter-boycott: A complete and total boycott of any artist, developer, company, product, or service that promotes or bends the knee to Anti-Ai ideology in any way. Since they won't dialogue with us whatsoever, I see no other course of action than to refuse to do business them, depriving them of our money, time, and attention. That's exactly what they're already doing to us, except that they have big government and major megacorps on their side. Boycott Anti-Ai.

i created this ARTWORK with *AI* it expresses my utter contempt for Anti-Ai "artists" in a cute and violent fashion it features my AI MOUSE WIFE incinerating their OBSOLETE TOOLS using a jerry can of GASOLINE throw this bitch in the Louvre

i'm going to find the person responsible for .webp and physically turn them into a JPEG