Joined August 2021
1,096 Photos and videos
Hijacked? No! Legitimately bought. It’s not the domain owners fault Meghan & her team failed to purchase the domain name in advance of announcing it. I mean they sought to protect a child’s name, so…🙄😆
36
56
777
75,848
A judgment is due in Harry/Various case vs NGN tomorrow. Likely on the application made to include claims that his mum, dad & Camilla‘s phones were intercepted that meant his private info was revealed. Counsel will know already. Maybe thats why we‘ve heard ‘settle‘ noises..😉
6
15
183
36,438
<[Harry] is subject to the same issues…that offers have been made [to settle] that makes it impossible for them to go ahead.> Surely not!!😉 Settling is grubby I thought. And it’s his lifes work, a David & Goliath thing. For us all & bugger the cost…No? mol.im/a/13321143
29
23
252
25,842
Lemons again. Lots of Lemons. I’ve got to hand to to her - this time Meghan has got the branding bang on: Sour. Bitter. Acidic. Tart….😉🍋
9
12
228
12,907
Peak Meghan! Sometimes, viewed in the abstract, you have to almost admire the sheer size of the ego… 🤯 mol.im/a/13319931
69
14
691
48,349
Since it’s topical, I’ll ask the question again - What does Travalyst actually DO? (besides preach) Anyone?
53
18
472
25,818
The ‘lucky’ recipients of the jam (who are willing to do Meghan‘s PR) has been seriously underwhelming, no?
18
5
236
11,379
So Hugh Grant settled his claim against NGN (The Sun) We don’t yet know about Harry’s claim, but let’s summarise what this means and what it potentially means for Harry… archive.ph/oxpYr
6
8
147
7,189
Civil claims are about Justice - correcting a wrong, not punishment for that wrong. If a settlement would have corrected that wrong, it is incumbent on parties to consider accepting it (rather than fight for headlines)!
1
1
33
2,692
So. Where does this leave Harry? If he declined an offer - potentially very exposed. He is gambling on both winning & doing better. Not a safe assumption. If he has accepted a settlement then I think that damages his ‘dragon slayer’ pomposity. No? We will see.
4
1
65
2,764
In Feb this yr Harry told @GMA when asked how Harry was as a DAD “I can’t tell you that, it’s classified. Top secret.” In Nov last yr Harry was emailing randoms actual court determined confidential information. He’s not just a fool. He’s so foolish, he IS the security risk…
16
52
578
12,979
Harry was forced to apologise to the court for sharing confidential info. This was only discovered as one of the people he sent it to worked at Schillings. The question is - HOW many other times has Harry breached this order? Have his communications been checked? They should be.
14
48
548
11,201
Harry (& others) unlawful information gathering claim against NGN (News Group Newspapers), is back in court again tomorrow.⬇️
27
25
230
23,503
A timely reminder for those who still need it - Harry did NOT have his security removed. He removed himself from his security. End.
29
159
1,816
25,953
Shouldn’t todays news that Harry breached a court imposed confidentiality order necessitate further action to ‘de-royal’ him? He is still, according to the RF website, a Counsellor of State (albeit pledged not to be used). CoS can stand in for the Monarch. He is unfit.
30
88
774
16,878