A 🔥 in a 😠🏠 at the 🔚 of 🕐 - AI and Robotics - 🤴XRP and 👸XLM - Philosophy - Epistemology- Worship the God of Love
Joined April 2021
- Tweets 11,548
- Following 629
- Followers 8,651
- Likes 14,223
2,528 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
15 Sep 2025
This is when I'll be forced to abandon my #XRP/#XLM thesis...
Commercial Banks, Institutions and Corporations are relatively easy to on-board into new financial technologies. Their business models are for-profit, their systems are for-profit. Whatever makes sense to bring more profit, they will adopt assuming they're legally allowed to do so. Such Institutions generally operate cross-border with shallow allegiance to the nation in which may hold their head office. They're flexible and adaptive amongst themselves because they handle the risk to their bottom line.
But Central Banks are far different. Central Banks do not seek profit. They have very little room for flexibility. Their parameters for operating are rigid. They act based on multinational agreements, decades apart. They adapt and change infrequently. But we are in a season of change now. And while we see much advancement in Commercial side, Central Banks have yet to make their move. They are confined to clearing houses, RTGS interlinking, correspondent banking and FX markets. Central Banks require liquid currency markets to manage sovereign value transfer and wholesale settlement.
Since we're in a season of change, it is my conclusion that the existence of global reserve currencies with ties to nation-states will soon fade away. The world will not accept a repackaged national reserve currency in digital form. The only way to solve Triffins Dilemma and propel the world into the future is by introducing a super-sovereign currency that can feed the liquidity needs of the currency markets.
The problem and solution have been identified. And until I see a more fitting solution taking hold and nations aligning towards it, I see XRP and XLMs ultimate use cases still unrealized.
PS: Why I stay a duel XRP/XLM maxi is because the idea of complete reliance on a single ledger to provide liquidity for all currency markets is neither wise nor safe. Parallel redundancy is needed in the event one fails/glitches/bugs so that markets and in turn nations, have minimal disruption.
1
24
2,090
Utility Obviously ⚖️ retweeted
22 Sep 2025
$mXRP is now live and available on dex.anodos.finance
We are proud to be one of the main @axelar partners for this launch and allow easy access to mXRP directly on XRPL!
22 Sep 2025
📢 Introducing $mXRP
A new yield-bearing liquid staked token that kickstarts DeFi on XRPL and unlocks up to 10% APY for $XRP holders.
Powered by @Axelar @MidasRWA 🧵 👇
36
144
650
179,574
Utility Obviously ⚖️ retweeted
18 Sep 2025
Proof that XRP(L) is decentralised!
And is it even more decentralised than blockchains with other consensus mechanisms? 🤔
LCX released a MiCA (EU crypto regulations) white paper for XRP!
Let's take a look at what LCX say and why it's important. 👇 1/6
14
103
423
20,992
Introducing the next building block of onchain markets – we’re partnering with @DBSbank and @FTI_Global to establish repo markets powered by tokenized collateral and stablecoins: on.ripple.com/421bxVL
Investors will be able to use $RLUSD to trade for Franklin Templeton’s money market fund, sgBENJI, tokenized on the XRP Ledger, and listed on DBS’s digital exchange, earning yield and opening new liquidity venues.
Institutional momentum is building onchain.
314
2,015
6,484
1,493,022
17 Sep 2025
There isn't a single Central Bank that has officially announced on which Blockchain ledger they will be building their balance sheet? Many pilots and discussions, but none have committed.
The official announcements will shock the crypto markets.
3
1
6
691
17 Sep 2025
This is what I do. Anyone who has followed me over the years knows I am thorough in my replies.
The new tactic of the weak is to dismiss factual and logical rebuttal as "AI slop".
I'm happy to expose this clowns biased ignorance.
17 Sep 2025
I didn't miss the point. I addressed the first part of your claim, which is built upon a demonstrably false assumption— that visa and Mastercard process near instant payments. Provisionally, yes, but not final settlement. And in the context of Brad's video, he is talking about Final Settlement.
Since you are ignoring the fact you are proven wrong, let's address your other poorly thought-out claims...
"both support higher TPS than $XRP" - while this is technically correct but ignores some nuance, you're comparing the performance of XRP to VISA in criticism of Brad's video where he is talking about RippleNET. He didn't mention XRP once. So conflating the two to make a point is a strawman argument. Neither of us know the TPS capability of RippleNET. So your claim here falls apart. In the context of making a domestic Uber driver payment instant, in a single sovereign currency RTGS setting but operating over RippleNET, performance could easily exceed VISAs, but again, neither of us know RippleNETs performance in a domestic or cross-border setting.
"The slowest part of the entire transaction is the compliance checks" - Sure. So what? Brad is talking about his vision for the future, where everything can be streamlined to near instant finality. Central Banks are moving in that direction. In a cross-border setting, ISO20022 is a major step forward that has yet to be implemented and enforced for cross-border transactions (Nov 2025). So you're referencing a problem of the traditional system in response to Brad who is talking about a hypothetical future system based on RippleNET.
"Brad knows this, but will keep peddling nonsense" - This claim is the most telling of all. It demonstrates your clear negativity bias. Brad isn't peddling anything but RippleNET as a solution to instant payments, particularly cross-border with near instant finality. That's his vision which aligns with reality and the direction of global payment systems, where even compliance can be automated in a near instant settlement.
The only thing you proved here is your inability to assess information accurately in offering commentary. You sir, are the one peddling nonsense.
2
10
870
17 Sep 2025
The ETFs have always needed to precede major adoption announcements.
Imagine the Federal Reserve announcing it was building on the XRPL, but with no regulated investment mechanisms in place for market participation. The infrastructure for compliant access must come first.
#XRP
1
6
488
Why after a decade in crypto I have stopped investing in new tokens
I have spent the last 10 years watching this space, investing, researching, advising, and now building. I have come to the realization that there is no point investing in new tokens or projects anymore, unless they really stand out (1 in a million chance). 99.9% of tokens are just money grabs made to raise cash and hook people with engagement but offer no real value. On top of that, 99.9% of token launches flop and 99.9% of tokens fail or turn into rugpulls (direct or indirect). Not to mention that most crypto VCs are pushing for that model and they just want a quick ex at the expense of the rest. Other problems pile up like too much hype over real substance, regulatory risks that hurt investors, and business models that fall apart quick leaving no trust behind.
The noise around new tokens is deafening with promises that rarely deliver and most projects lack a solid foundation to stand on. It's now 1 in a million chance that a token will succeed. I’ve seen too many founders pump and dump leaving communities wrecked. Another thing is that the constant need to chase trends burns out most people.
Now I only put my money into blue chips and established assets (primarily L1 coins), and Real World Assets and tokens with real backing or revenue shared with holders, tying their success to the project and company. This approach cuts through the nonsense and focuses on equity like models. Which also leads to one case: why create a token when you can simply tokenize your equity and company ownership directly? why mess with a token when equity gives clear value and aligns everyone? The future of finance is onchain, the future of investing is onchain equity, and I’m betting on projects that prove it with substance.
18
29
186
12,288
13 Sep 2025
Cherry-picking today's date randomly...
Since Jan 24th:
XRP 1%
XDC -32%
24 Jan 2025
Sorry #XDC family. I'm out. I love the project, but I can not deny the significance of recent developments. The strong odds are that #XRP will see massive inflows far greater and sooner than XDC. The narrative is "American Crypto" first.
I may be wrong, but I believe I'm right.
1
8
1,865
Utility Obviously ⚖️ retweeted
6 Sep 2025
Jesus defeated death so you can live.
5,864
78,964
303,479
27,309,299
10 Sep 2025
Do not despair. Do not fear.
Call out evil regardless of the color of one's skin or their political affiliation. Do not blame a group for the actions of a few.
Worship the God of Love.
6
597
9 Sep 2025
9 Sep 2025
🚨NEW: In a recent speech, Acting CFTC Chair @CarolineDPham said the agency is exploring whether foreign crypto trading platforms that follow robust, crypto-specific rules, such as the EU’s MiCA framework, could be recognized under U.S. cross-border regulations.
It follows the agency’s recent reaffirmation of its longstanding framework for Foreign Boards of Trade (FBOTs), which allows certain non-U.S. crypto exchanges already regulated by a foreign authority to provide direct access to U.S. traders by registering with the CFTC as FBOTs rather than as Designated Contract Markets (DCMs).
6
728
9 Sep 2025
Long-time partnerships expanding....
Ripple Custody 🤝 @BBVA 🇪🇸
We're expanding our partnership with @BBVA, bringing our institutional-grade digital asset custody technology to Spain: on.ripple.com/47A2jDp
BBVA is responding to growing customer demand for crypto assets, with Ripple providing a secure and compliant custody solution.
9
551
8 Sep 2025
Does anyone have the official source where it was Blackrock or some other authority, admitting that the consensus is to move forward building on Public blockchains rather than Private solutions?
1
1
515
8 Sep 2025
How does one "rewrite the rules... of crypto" without there being existing rules that were agreed upon?
What would those rules have been and what are they being rewritten to?
Putin’s advisor Kobyakov: The U.S. has devised a crypto scheme to erase its massive debt at the world’s expense.
“The U.S. is now trying to rewrite the rules of the gold and cryptocurrency markets. Remember the size of their debt 35 trillion dollars. These two sectors (crypto and gold) are essentially alternatives to the traditional global currency system.
Washington’s actions in this area clearly highlight one of its main goals: to urgently address the declining trust in the dollar.
As in the 1930s and the 1970s, the U.S. plans to solve its financial problems at the world’s expense this time by pushing everyone into the “crypto cloud.” Over time, once part of the U.S. national debt is placed into stablecoins, Washington will devalue that debt.
Put simply: they have a $35 trillion currency debt, they’ll move it into the crypto cloud, devalue it and start from scratch.
That’s the reality for those who are so enthusiastic about crypto.”
Credit to @russiadirect and @CRYPT0XRP0
Source forumvostok.ru/programme/pre…
3
18
1,865