Heyo, this is a long one so buckle up... Wanted to come out and say this as things have definitely spiraled out of control here. In regards to my software VOS that i just released to the public under open source, I never intended for any of this to be strewn this way. My intentions originally were to share a cool tool i made that has helped me and friends, with the public at large. Ive heard the criticisms, and seen your responses to it... I wanted to say Im sorry for how i marketed it, and for how the presentation and ambiguity came off for it. Im relatively new to the Twitter environment, and my other platforms i exist on know me for that style of editing and glamour, but i do realize now that the style i presented it in, without core information, comparisons, or just general care for how others would interpret it, definitely left so much room for distrust and fear without showing what it truly was. I appreciate those of you who came to defend the video i made, but the reality is it wasnt the right kind needed to build trust from nothing in an environment where people are getting hacked left and right. What the tool is, on the most basic level, is a collection of hundreds of fixes and step by step guides for multiple types of VR systems, all inside a dedicated package that can both show you whats wrong with your current build, how to fix it, and contains a live optimizer to help reduce bloat on the main cpu to help prevent overloading. Thats it. At its core, all fixes it does, including the auto fix section, could and can be done by someone if they did enough research or used enough guides. Of which there are plenty of on the internet, and some way more in depth than what is provided currently in VOS. It does not touch anythign sensitive or irreversible on your pc, and does not touch vrchat in any way, so its not against TOS or dangerous in any manner, as has been audited by coders in the comments in the main post. Though my code was sloppy. I did that research on my own. I scoured the web and compiled that data. Why? Because It was originally for me, because my vr setup kept lagging for streams and i wanted to figure out why. And i did, which i dont need to get into here. But as a prior access control specialist, I use tools in my workshop to help push something like that forward and develop faster because i was impatient. Outwardly, yes, "AI" was used to assist, but not in the way you think, and did not write it for me. I openly admit that an agent was used to assist in coding completions, but not as a creative engine where i just told it what to do. I did not prompt the AI to do things for me, it just essentially finished my "sentences" like autocorrect on your phone does. Regardless, using AI in any large open source capacity is unprofessional, as im not a corporate coding slave who has deadlines to meet. Taking the lazy way out of something i already knew how to do was wrong, and im fully aware of its impacts, of which i am actually sorry for... The code has been audited by new friends and critics alike, all of which have given me good advice on best practices and what to do to fix any potential security risks in it as time goes on. I hear all the feedback ive been getting, and am willing to hear more, if it does end up benefiting both my ability to work on software like this, and my ability to help others with something like this, since that was the whole goal. Since the project lives open source on github, I wont be removing it, but I will be urging all of you to remain careful of anything suspicious in any capacity. I realize how all this made both my skills and my intentions seem wrongly aligned, and i truly am sorry for that... Im working on a better demo for the future, showing exactly what it is, what it does, and how it works, so that no one is in the dark about what it is or why it matters (and wont kill your pc). On top of that, im re-coding parts of it myself with the help and advice from those who spoke out to give me pointers to make it more safe. At the same time, im applying for code signatures (meaning the files are verified by companies to ensure sfaety) before ever reaching the public, because the last thing i want is a tool like this being used in any wrong capacity. From this point forward, i will be removing the update function from the software until i get that signature, so that if you choose to update, you can grab it from the public website/github where all changes and updates are logged in the open for everyone to see, and you can feel safe knowing you arent downloading anything harmful. Ill be working in tandem with @VixenVRC and others to verify my code and keep people in the loop, because all i want to do is help others the way my stuff helped me and my friends. Again im sorry about how all this went down, you guys deserved better knowledge and more a more forthright video/marketing (if you even wanna call it that since its fee), ESPECIALLY with all the cybercrime going around. I hope I can build that trust with all of you over time, and if that isnt possible for some, thats fine. I still maintain that if you dont trust it, dont download it, even if its mine. If you have any questions, feel free to ask below. Ill answer.