So, I opened my email today and found out from the American Academy of Dermatology member email that USA Today ran AAD's Practice Safe Sun survey.
The same day I posted about how dermatology is killing people and had it go viral, closing in on a million views.
Talk about a lucky coincidence. Honestly. It's not like the AAD keeps me informed about their PR schedule.
The headline finding: 16 million Americans have reduced sunscreen use because of online "misinformation."
Based on timing, they obviously weren't talking about my post specifically, but given the "there is no such thing as a safe tan" quote in the article, I'll bet they'd call it misinformation, even though I'm not anti-sunscreen.
Man I hope
@aadskin or
@aadmember engages.
It'd make them engage with the peer-reviewed evidence base that sun avoidance increases mortality:
-MISS cohort, 29,500 Swedish women, 25 years. Lowest sun exposure had mortality comparable to smokers.
-UK Biobank, ~400,000 participants. Highest UV exposure had 19% lower cardiovascular mortality, 15% lower all-cause mortality.
-Korean NBUVB study, 12,000 vitiligo patients. 100 clinic phototherapy sessions associated with 36% fewer cardiovascular events.
The AAD is worried "misinformation" is causing people to wear less sunscreen.
I'm worried the AAD is killing people.