Name screening is an often-underestimated part of AML compliance.
In January 2026, the UK Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation announced a £160,000 penalty against Bank of Scotland. The case involved a sanctioned individual whose name variation was missed by the bank’s screening system, after which 24 transactions were processed, totalling £77,383.39.
In real-world screening, teams need to handle spelling variations, name-order changes, transliteration differences, aliases, OCR noise, cross-script records, and glyph-based manipulation.
The FATF/APG 2026 Singapore Mutual Evaluation Report also noted that Singapore’s AML/CFT/CPF system needs to be sharper in producing demonstrable and consistent risk-based results.
For compliance teams, screening outcomes need to support review, explanation, and audit: recall affects missed-risk exposure, false positives affect manual review pressure, and evidence quality affects case explanation and regulatory review.
WIDTH’s name matching, sanctions screening, and AML screening capabilities support scenario-aware matching, dynamic thresholds, and case review workflows, helping teams connect screening alerts with customer context, case evidence, and audit records.