We're all lab rats in the global wireless industry's experiment on humanity to determine if exposure to microwave radiation is safe -

Joined October 2008
191 Photos and videos
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
👇💥👇💥👇 Dr. Robert Brown shares his research on rouleaux formation in blood after cell phone exposure ----- This is the hugest disclosure of the decade! Cell phone radiation making red blood cells stick and clump, now documented by "in vivo" imaging! youtube.com/watch?v=kjZ92iuG…
4
19
36
3,019
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
‼️ The FCC wants to make it easier to install cell towers: faster, with fewer obstacles, significantly limited local input. This means fewer opportunities for communities to weigh in before infrastructure is built near homes, schools, and neighborhoods. ✅ Easier for industry. ❌ Harder for residents. And once it’s approved? You’re the one living with it. This isn’t just about connectivity…it’s about who gets a say in your community and about your health. 👉 This is exactly why we need to restore local control under Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Follow @704nomore to stay informed and take action
7
8
248
72% - 89% of published scientific studies reported significant biological effects from RF (wireless) radiation: genetic, neurological and reproductive saferemr.com/2018/02/effects…
1
1
14
5 years ago, the US D.C. Court of Appeals mandated that FCC update their 30 year old, worthless federal wireless radiation "safety" limits. The agency continues to blatantly ignore the court order and to accelerate the wireless industry's buildout of 4G/5G cell towers and antennas - icbe-emf.org/cell-phone-and-… @704NoMore @EHNewsroom @FCC
2
3
24
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
🏠 Your home is a huge investment. What happens when a cell tower is placed next door? ⚠️ Property value decreases. ⚠️ Fire risk. ⚠️ Constant RF exposure. This isn’t just theoretical— it’s happening in communities everyday. Visit Stop5g to learn how to protect your home and community from unwanted cell towers:
5
16
27
725
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
🚫 Those fake “trees” hiding cell towers aren’t just unfortunate to look at — they shed microplastics into our air, soil, and water. What’s sold as “camouflage” creates more pollution more radiation. Section 704 of the 1996 Telecom Act SILENCES communities on health environmental harms and lets industry call all the shots. It’s time to take that power back. Join the @704nomore coalition to restore local control and protect our neighborhoods:
3
10
15
441
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
🏠 Cell towers can slash property values — and the telecom industry has ensured you can’t fight back. Section 704 of the 1996 Telecom Act blocks communities from rejecting towers, even when they harm neighborhoods and home values. It’s time to take that power back. Join the @704nomore coalition to restore local control and protect our communities. #704NoMore
8
8
101
Take a moment to send a message to your elected federal officials by clicking on the action link below. The government needs to update its 30 year old wireless radiation exposure "safety" guidelines - they only protect the wireless industry, not the rest of us. childrenshealthdefense.org/c…
23
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
"Given the settled science based on thousands of studies, if at this point you don't believe in the danger of wireless radiation, maybe you're the conspiracy theorist." Children's Health Defense. May 2026. 👇 👀childrenshealthdefense.org/d…
1
11
32
495
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
🚨 BAD NEWS: 1 in 8 adults in the U.S. report adverse effects from wireless exposure. Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 limits how local communities can address health concerns from this exposure. Here’s the GOOD NEWS ↓ You can speak up and help restore local coontrol to your community. Learn more by visiting the 704 No More® website.
3
15
12
480
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
🚨 EMR from cell towers has a negative impact on both animals and their habitats. Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 → LIMITS health environmental arguments for cell tower placement. → RESTRICTS local voices. → PREVENTS communities from rejecting projects based on those impacts. Your voice matters — be part of the shift. Visit the 704 No More® website for resources on what’s happening to wildlife and natural landscapes — and actions you can take. #ARBORDAY
2
11
20
398
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
🚨 Wireless radiation from cell towers impacts both our environment and health. Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 limits how much communities can consider these impacts when towers are placed. We believe that’s wrong. ⭐️ Our health matters. ⭐️ Our environment matters. ⭐️ Our voices matter. Take action with 704 No More® #EARTHDAY
2
3
96
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
No acceleration or expansion of wireless infrastructure until the FCC complies with the 2021 court order, which ruled that the FCC failed to properly review scientific evidence on the health effects of wireless radiation when it kept its safety limits unchanged. The court said the FCC’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious” and ordered the agency to go back, fully evaluate the evidence, and justify its standards, which still HAS NOT BEEN DONE. #704nomore #federalcelltowertakeover
Lyons and McCollough: Grassroots Stall Broadband Legislation, Call Out Telecom Influence
2
2
108
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
Imagine a honey bee flying through waves of toxic electromagnetic radiation — emerging research shows these signals may disrupt their behavior and biology. This Earth Month, be their voice: 🐝 protect pollinators 🌻 protect our ecosystems 🧐 question what’s being placed in our environment Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 limits what communities can consider EVEN when it comes to environmental impact. Take action with @704nomore® @CHDTVLive
5
60
96
1,184
Consumers4SafePhones retweeted
RFK Jr says you shouldn't put a cellphone near your child's head, and this is why.

11
105
411
34,586