9 Time Eye Test Champion! World #1 Ranked Eye Test. Former D1 Athlete with 1 year of eligibility left.

Joined July 2025
2,257 Photos and videos
Matt retweeted
Can we have a conversation about how Cincinnati needs to be punished in someway for all this? Sorsby hasn’t even played a snap for Texas Tech. They played him all of 2025 knowing he had this issue and they’re gonna face ZERO REPERCUSSIONS for all this. That’s unacceptable.
I disagree. Cincinnati played Sorsby all last year knowing he had this problem (according to USA Today), and clearly wanted to stick it to TT and Sorsby for the transfer. Lost in all of this is the player who is a human being with a problem. @dannykanell , you and others who have never suffered through an addiction will never understand it so I don’t expect you to see the kid’s side of it. TT told him they’d have his back and they’re keeping their commitment even though it would be easier not to. I’ve followed this from the start and TT has done exactly what they’ve said publicly they would do. You may not agree with them, but they’ve been very transparent.
37
29
381
27,272
Matt retweeted
Someone please wake me up when/if Brendan Sorsby actually PLAYS in a game for Texas Tech. Dude has not as much as worn a game day uniform and for 4 days, all we've heard is "boycott Tech this" and "kick Tech out of the league that!" Meanwhile, Cincinnati played him for 2 years!
66
32
380
15,515
Matt retweeted
How dare #TexasTech adapt to current recruiting rules, adhere to court rulings, invest in its program & become relevant? All of a sudden folks have problems with tortillas, Tech's schedule & now Sorsby. Why schools are really so mad at Tech: 247sports.com/college/texas-… #WreckEm
91
24
223
11,555
Matt retweeted
These reporters have been slobbering over schools like Bama, UGA and LSU who have done nefarious things for DECADES but now the line to banishment is here. 😂
Cody Campbell and Texas Tech desperately want a seat at the big boys table. They are doing everything possible this week to get permanently banished. nytimes.com/athletic/7349555…
121
22
212
45,655
I can't stand Texas Tech... but that started way before Sorsby 🤣. But I think I am on Tech's side with this situation. Why? Sorsby is the Villian here and Cincinnati is the enabler. UC knew about the gambling in 2024 and didn't report it to the NCAA. Read the court docs if you haven't. There is also no evidence that says TTU or IU knew anything about the gambling until March when the world found out. At that point he was already at Tech. Now, should they play him? No. The game is bigger than one, above average but not quite elite QB that they'll have for only one year. Will they play him? Yes. Can I blame them? No. Why is it their responsibilty to not play him, regardless of if it is the right thing to do for the collective sport or not, when the courts have said he cannot be impeded from playing until the temporary injunction is over in February? In case no one has been paying attention, amatuerism is over in college athletics. It's been over for years. Especially since 2021 when NIL started. Every college has been essentially forced to become extremely selfish if they ever want to win, and that is what Texas Tech is trying to do. So who is the villian behind the villian? Who is the real enemy? The NCAA. They have refused to update their governance since NIL (which they also screwed up mind you) which is why they continue to lose court case after court case. They are still trying to enforce an amatuer model in a NIL world. They can't have their cake and eat it too. That is the message the judicial system has been send to them for years. College and Pro-levels are basically the same now, except for one MAJOR issue... Pros have structured rules through collective bargaining (which is exactly what college athletics needs), and Pro Organizations have shields that the NCAA does not have. The NCAA has to change their governance soon or they will become obsolete and left in the dust. Also, the "Protect College Sports Act" is not going to do it, in case anyone is wondering. So, it's easy to be mad at Texas Tech right now. But ask yourself; Big picture, where should our anger really be directed?
1
2
557
Matt retweeted
I can't stand Texas Tech... but that started way before Sorsby 🤣. But I think I am on Tech's side with this situation. Why? Sorsby is the Villian here and Cincinnati is the enabler. UC knew about the gambling in 2024 and didn't report it to the NCAA. Read the court docs if you haven't. There is also no evidence that says TTU or IU knew anything about the gambling until March when the world found out. At that point he was already at Tech. Now, should they play him? No. The game is bigger than one, above average but not quite elite QB that they'll have for only one year. Will they play him? Yes. Can I blame them? No. Why is it their responsibilty to not play him, regardless of if it is the right thing to do for the collective sport or not, when the courts have said he cannot be impeded from playing until the temporary injunction is over in February? In case no one has been paying attention, amatuerism is over in college athletics. It's been over for years. Especially since 2021 when NIL started. Every college has been essentially forced to become extremely selfish if they ever want to win, and that is what Texas Tech is trying to do. So who is the villian behind the villian? Who is the real enemy? The NCAA. They have refused to update their governance since NIL (which they also screwed up mind you) which is why they continue to lose court case after court case. They are still trying to enforce an amatuer model in a NIL world. They can't have their cake and eat it too. That is the message the judicial system has been send to them for years. College and Pro-levels are basically the same now, except for one MAJOR issue... Pros have structured rules through collective bargaining (which is exactly what college athletics needs), and Pro Organizations have shields that the NCAA does not have. The NCAA has to change their governance soon or they will become obsolete and left in the dust. Also, the "Protect College Sports Act" is not going to do it, in case anyone is wondering. So, it's easy to be mad at Texas Tech right now. But ask yourself; Big picture, where should our anger really be directed?
95
73
668
39,763
Matt retweeted
Best comeback I’ve seen in The Garden since this one.
13
110
1,388
23,624
Matt retweeted
Let’s just move on at this point. Congress and NCAA need to get this figured out. But the fact that schools in the SEC even in Big Ten cheat, lie and break the rules all the time….. I’m just rolling me eyes at this point
As Big 12 presidents consider sanctions, Texas Tech reps notified the league that any penalty will be met with legal action, sources tell @YahooSports. Tech is exploring legal avenues with noted attorney Jeff Kessler, including seeking a second injunction bit.ly/4v1ghqC
27
11
204
15,260
Matt retweeted
everything we built this season, now is the time to finish it. there's just one more level to reach. 😈
61
112
2,903
93,645
I can’t wait until we find out this is @weekendatbarner backup burner.
We’ve only eaten fast food since arriving in the USA, so we needed something different today. First vitamins of the trip. This on the right cost $15 btw.
4
655
Matt retweeted
Great post, and this is part is absolutely spot on! “There is a difference between defending the person and defending the mistake. Texas Tech is in an impossible spot. Deep down, they may have hoped the final ruling would remove the decision from their hands. Exhaust every option, support the player, let the process play out, and if he is ruled ineligible, accept it. That is the cleanest outcome for a program trying to balance loyalty, discipline, public pressure, and competitive integrity.”
I understand why people are uncomfortable with the Brendan Sorsby situation. Betting on sports as a college athlete is serious. Betting connected to your own team creates an obvious integrity concern. Nobody has to minimize that. But there is another side to this that college football people should at least be honest enough to acknowledge. When a player becomes part of your program, he becomes part of your football family. That does not mean you excuse everything. It does not mean accountability disappears. It means you do not abandon him the second the situation becomes difficult, public, or uncomfortable. There is a difference between defending the person and defending the mistake. Texas Tech is in an impossible spot. Deep down, they may have hoped the final ruling would remove the decision from their hands. Exhaust every option, support the player, let the process play out, and if he is ruled ineligible, accept it. That is the cleanest outcome for a program trying to balance loyalty, discipline, public pressure, and competitive integrity. But now the court has ruled that he is legally allowed to play. That changes the structure of the decision. If Texas Tech turns its back on him now, what message does that send to every player and family they recruit? That we will fight for you until the pressure gets too loud? That we will call you family when you are producing, but distance ourselves when standing beside you becomes inconvenient? If I were recruiting against Texas Tech and they abandoned him after he was legally cleared to play, I would use that every time. Not because the mistake does not matter, but because trust matters. Families want to know what happens when their son is injured, struggling, accused, embarrassed, or sitting in the middle of a situation nobody wants attached to the program. Accountability and loyalty are not opposites. You can believe justice should be served. You can believe the integrity of the game matters. You can believe gambling violations deserve real consequence. You can also believe that a program should stand by its people through the full process, not just through the easy parts. That is the hard part of family. You do not only fight for your people when the optics are clean. You fight for them through the good and the bad, while still demanding accountability, treatment, discipline, and truth. Texas Tech may not like the position it is in. Most programs would not. But once he is legally allowed to play and remains part of the Red Raider family, abandoning him strictly because of social pressure would send its own message. And that message may be harder to overcome than the controversy itself.
824
149
1,398
979,648
All SEC teams should refuse to play LSU. Check out this clip sponsored by FanDuel 😂😂
Ed Orgeron on the SEC paying players before NIL: “Back then, we used to walk through the back door with the cash. Now, we just got to walk through the front door with the cash.” 💀 Coach O is the best storyteller 🤣
2
16
129
11,066
LSU is killing college athletics. We should all refuse to play LSU in ALL sports
Jun 9
NEW: NC State is investigating whether LSU improperly persuaded Will Wade to break his contract with the Wolfpack, @WRAL reports. on3.com/news/report-nc-state…
17
4
112
6,278
Matt retweeted
There’s no way people think this gambling thing is a bigger issue to take a stand on than the years and years and years of illegally benefits funneling the BEST players in the nation to one conference but what do I know
10
5
45
2,836
Matt retweeted
Now my own son is trolling me?? What a couple of days it’s been!!
Boomer Sooner?? #OUDNA
108
36
1,380
274,755
The Lubbock judge who decided the injunction in the Brendan Sorsby case is Ken Curry. He is a retired Tarrant county judge. Who is a Houston graduate. Context that mainstream media is not providing. I don’t think it’s fair to say that he is a Texas Tech Homer.
QB Brendan Sorsby has been granted his injunction against the NCAA.
92
52
564
57,224
Child rape? 🤝 QB gambles? DELETE LUBBOCK FROM EARTH
NEWS: Big Ten officials are expected to discuss in the upcoming days a league-wide mandate to not play Texas Tech in any sports, per three Big Ten sources. This is in the wake of Nebraska AD Troy Dannen informing his staff today that they aren't allowed to schedule Texas Tech.
29
25
473
22,518
Matt retweeted
I don’t get Tech becoming a villain because a judge made a bizarre ruling, which could still be overturned assuming the NCAA appeals. I think the ruling standing would be an injustice based on rules & precedent, but don’t act like your program would sit an eligible $5M QB out.
151
72
1,091
55,005
Matt retweeted
texas tech is exposing the ncaa for what it is but instead of everyone being upset with the ncaa they're slamming tech. remember who writes the rules. they are the real crooks.
176
84
892
52,571
Matt retweeted
Watching some of the most historically corrupt schools in program history absolutely crash out over Texas Tech getting a good ruling has been..... something to witness
40
25
281
9,304