This is how he does. He starts with “As a Muslim” and goes on to push his Munafiq-agenda. One of the earliest people who acted the way you act was Abdullah ibn Ubayy ibn Salul. Go and read how he ended up his life. The truth will always stand against the rage bait misconception you are peddling. And I have come to believe you like the attention you are getting. Notice how you did not even dare to cite a single specific country or example in your post. You left it completely vague because looking closely at real data would instantly destroy your narrative. If you are rational, a single Google Search would have helped you. Let me do the honest analysis you were too afraid to touch. In Egypt, Christians make up about 10% of the population, numbering over 10 million people, and the government has formally legalized more than 2,100 churches and church buildings in recent years. In Lebanon, Christians make up around 37% to 40% of the population and hold the highest political offices, including the presidency, by constitutional law. In Jordan, Christians have a guaranteed quota of 9 seats in the national parliament to ensure their political voice. They own massive cathedrals, practice openly, and run their own autonomous religious courts because classical Islamic law explicitly guarantees their protection, financial autonomy, and freedom to worship. Even in the modern Gulf states, where the populations are heavily expatriate, churches are built and protected by law. The UAE is home to over 1 million Christians who make up roughly 12.6% of the population, worshiping freely across approximately 40 churches and 700 ministries. Qatar similarly hosts a massive Christian population of about 13% with multiple registered denominations operating freely out of dedicated church complexes. Then we have Saudi Arabia where there are no Churches. Why? The lack of churches there is not an arbitrary double standard or a sign of intolerance; it is a specific legislative exception grounded in the direct command of the Prophet (peace be upon him). I have said this countless times. The Peninsula is the sacred sanctuary and the foundational core of Islam. Every civilization on earth maintains a sovereign sacred space with unique rules. The Vatican does not host mosques, and you cannot build a foreign military base on the lawns of Washington DC. The restriction in the Hejaz is about geographic sanctity, and not a denial of human rights. If you are what you call yourself, at least educate yourself. We have classical legal manuals that would have helped you here if you truly want to speak about the position of Islam. Ahkam Ahl al-Dhimmah by Ibn al-Qayyim or the deep analytical works of Imam Al-Qarafi in Al-Furuq is online. Everything about the rights of Non-Muslims in a Muslim sovereign state under the Islamic law is there. Al-Qarafi explicitly wrote that caring for non-Muslim citizens is a sacred covenant. This is the text of the law. He states that if an external enemy comes to harm them, Muslims are obligated to fight and die protecting them. This is a binding legal duty under Shariah, not an optional act of modern tolerance. If there is any restriction anywhere, or in few modern countries, they are a product of contemporary geopolitics, state control, and regime survival. They do not represent the classical Shariah blueprint. Therefore, trying to judge a 1400-year-old legal tradition by the actions of modern political regimes is an intellectual failure. The scholarly record is clear for anyone who genuinely cares about the truth instead of chasing social media engagement. I hope the Almighty guides you. Allah knows best.