Joined July 2024
- Tweets 20,707
- Following 608
- Followers 583
- Likes 32,875
137 Photos and videos
Karen Rainey retweeted
Ouch!
Have you seen missing child Maddison, aged 11?
Maddison is missing from Northampton and was last seen in the Northampton area at 20:00 hours on 16th, June 2026.
When Maddison was last seen, she was wearing a white top, light pink skirt and had black and white trainers. She also has a pink and white bicycle.
Maddison is 4ft, of slim build, and has brown/ginger hair.
If you have seen Maddison or have information about where she is, please call us on 999 quoting missing person reference NP-20260616-0677.
You can also report a sighting of a missing person on our website here: orlo.uk/0kFrc
Maddison, if you see this appeal, please get in touch with us as soon as possible. You're not in trouble, we just need to make sure you are OK.
8
107
88
1,845
Karen Rainey retweeted
Rupert Lowe's Mass Deportations Blueprint Is the Most Serious Document in British Politics. It Has One Unanswered Question.
Restore Britain's mass deportations policy paper is not what its critics say it is. It is not a fantasy document or a manifesto for ethnic cleansing. It is a serious, legally considered, operationally detailed blueprint for removing every person living in Britain illegally, estimated at between 1.8 and 2 million people. It identifies the real obstacles honestly, the ECHR, the Human Rights Act, the Equality Act, the asylum system as currently constituted, and proposes specific mechanisms for dismantling each of them. Anyone who dismisses it without reading it is not engaging with the argument. They are avoiding it.
The diagnosis is correct. Britain has between 1.8 and 2 million people living here without legal status, confirmed by the Thames Water sewage methodology and the Home Office's own figures. The removal rate for illegal Channel arrivals stands at four percent. The legal architecture is the primary obstacle, not political will, not operational capacity. The paper is right about all of that, and it deserves credit for saying so plainly when every other party is still pretending the problem is the gangs rather than the system that processes their customers and keeps them here.
The operational logic is also sounder than critics acknowledge. A hostile environment, mandatory right to work checks, biometric banking requirements, severe penalties for employers and landlords, voluntary returns incentivised ahead of forced removals, is exactly the mechanism that works. The US reduced border crossings from 1.6 million to under 240,000 within months using comparable tools. Hungary processes 47 asylum applications in six months. The paper draws on real precedent, not wishful thinking.
Where the delivery question remains open is the constitutional demolition required before any of this can begin. Withdrawing from the ECHR. Repealing the Human Rights Act. Passing a Great Clarification Act to reassert parliamentary sovereignty over the courts. Each of those is achievable in principle through a parliament with a sufficient majority and the will to use it. Each would also trigger a legal, political and institutional firestorm of a scale Britain has not seen in modern times. Every legal charity, every NGO, every charity funded to shift public attitudes on migration through children's television and national newspapers, every activist network and left-leaning institution in the country would mobilise simultaneously. Behind them, the red-green alliance of hard-left organisations and Islamist sympathisers that fills Britain's streets on weekends numbers in the hundreds of thousands. Their opposition has never been limited to the ballot box. International pressure would be immediate. The courts would be flooded with injunctions before the first removal flight left the ground.
That is not an argument against attempting it. It is an argument for preparing the political ground before the legislative attempt is made. A government that moves to repeal the Human Rights Act without a consolidated electoral mandate, without public opinion hardened by years of honest argument, and without having first demonstrated it can enforce existing law, will find the attempt buried under procedural challenges before it gets started. The permanent state is expert at using legal process to exhaust political will. Rwanda proved that.
The achievable version of this is not constitutional demolition. It is law enforcement. Close the border. Remove those here illegally using existing powers pushed to their limits. Build the mandate for the harder steps from the credibility earned by the easier ones. Restore's supporters are right that the political class has failed them for thirty years. The question the paper has not yet answered is what happens in the room when the lawyers arrive.
ALT Rupert Lowe
25
142
375
5,539
Karen Rainey retweeted
Bushra Shaikh. The Apprentice contestant turned Iranian regime mouthpiece. State-sponsored tours. Hezbollah rallies. Counter-terror probe. And now lecturing Britain about "national security threats."
You address pro-regime rallies where terrorist flags wave. You spread messaging that mirrors Tehran's state TV. You face police investigation for supporting a terrorist state. And you have the audacity to call Rupert Lowe a security threat?
The IRGC executes protesters. Funds terror. Destabilizes the region. And you cheerlead for them. Then come to Britain and tell victims of rape gangs there's "no link" to the ideology that motivated their abusers.
You are not a commentator. You are a propagandist for a terrorist regime. Your first speech at an Iranian rally will be remembered long after your Apprentice audition is forgotten.
The only national security threat is you.
Desperate stuff yet again by Rupert Lowe. Islam is not responsible for the actions of some bad people. The same way Christianity isn't. Islam sentences paedophiles and in many cases, rapists to death. That in itself proves there is no link.
This man is putting the lives of ordinary British Muslims in danger and this must be treated as a national security threat.
4
38
125
2,173
Karen Rainey retweeted
@RupertLowe10 has just dropped this.
I am sharing this because I know how much Muslims, lefties, the government and mainstream media don’t want people to see it.
It’s estimated that 20% of them in their communities took part in this. Brothers, cousins and uncles all joined in this together.
Even the ones who didn’t take part know about it and said nothing. They will always defend another Muslim no matter how heinous the crime.
Every time it gets brought up they try and deflect it onto us by bringing up white n0nces. Completely ignoring the fact that this went on, on an industrial scale for years and was covered up by their community and the authorities.
The girls were targeted because they were white and non Muslim. If any of you have ever looked into the Quran will know that the messages are often to torment non believers. It teaches them that we are beneath them, which is why they treat us with such contempt and often even murder us. It is to be expected from people who worship a man who married a 6 year old baby.
Truly awful people. Not all but a huge amount of them and I no longer want any more entering our country.
Here is the link: bit.ly/4uE5odw
3
17
65
1,906
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
After witnessing @YoungBobRB getting attacked on the streets by filthy scumbags, I'm offering free bodyguarding service for a year if somebody can help me get this message out to him much appreciated.
618
4,232
19,982
258,038
Karen Rainey retweeted
This guy stole Young Bob’s phone..
Anyone know who this is ?
34
158
483
20,295
Karen Rainey retweeted
Oi @elonmusk I don’t care if you share mine I am not in this for money, clicks or likes and neither is this man but any chance you can just do the right thing and share @CraigHouston_ and @ACSPARTAN1 content ffs
13
109
370
15,714
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
If everyone has to be tolerant, why did you as a non Muslim need to wear a headscarf?
Jun 15
Everyone should be able to live in safety and peace and no one should fear being targeted because of who they are.
Deputy First Minister Jenny Gilruth visited community representatives following recent disorder.
We stand in solidarity with all those affected by recent events.
312
2,343
21,996
419,707
Jun 15
RT @YoungBobRB: Someone has submitted footage of what happened. Look at how a gang of foreigners just randomly begin hitting and punching m…
6,237
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
Prince's Dock, Liverpool. Goodnight folks.
5
16
155
2,011
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
Ask Andy Burnham about Operation Hexagon, and how his police force worked alongside Labour politicians to try and prevent the truth of what happened from coming out. Ask him.
Jun 10
I exposed Andy Burnham's role in the Pakistani Rape gang cover up. In bite sized chunks, I will share with you the evidence. We start with @AndyBurnhamGM himself.
Part 1: ANDY BURNHAM KNEW BETTER
Start here. Before anything else, understand who this man is.
Andy Burnham was the Shadow Home Secretary from around 2015 to 2017. He would have known everything there was to know about Rotherham. He would have known the Alexis Jay report, which exposed how more than 1,400 children were abused in that town while officials looked away, suppressed evidence, and attacked the people raising the alarm. He would have known Rochdale. He would have known the pattern.
Organised networks of predominantly Pakistani men, children in local authority care, police who chose not to see, councils who chose not to act, a political class that chose silence.
None of it would have been new to him when he walked into the Mayor's office in 2017.
Go back further. Andy Burnham is the politician whose name is most associated with forcing the truth out of Hillsborough. He has posted a video of himself at Anfield, speaking at the memorial, calling it the moment his politics changed.
He campaigned for years on the argument that institutional cover-ups are broken open by one thing. Statutory powers to compel evidence and a legal duty of candour on public officials. That is his own position. His own words. He has campaigned to write the duty of candour into law. He sat with the Hillsborough families celebrating when they finally got it. He has used those families in his Makerfield campaign literature. He has used them.
He has always known what separates a process capable of extracting the truth from one that merely asks for it. The difference is statutory compulsion, sworn evidence, and a legal obligation to produce documents. Without those three things, you are asking institutions to confess to their own crimes. They will not. That is not cynicism. That is the lesson of every cover-up in modern British public life, and it is the lesson Burnham himself spent years teaching publicly.
His experience as Shadow Home Secretary, his knowledge of Rotherham and Rochdale, his campaigns on Hillsborough, none of this lowered the standard he would be held to. It raised it. He understood the landscape better than almost any politician in this country when he took office. He cannot claim ignorance. He knew what the tools were. He chose not to use them.
When he was given the power and the opportunity as Mayor of Greater Manchester to go after the rape gangs and expose what had been done to children across Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham chose the process that facilitated a cover up.
He did not make an error of judgment. He chose it deliberately, knowing what that choice would produce.
Ask him why he launched a 7 year series of powerless Assurance Reviews instead of demanding a National Inquiry.
_________
I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town EXPOSED ANDY BURNHAM and helped force the national inquiry.
You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back.
All of my work is 100% free. There are no paywalls to access any of my content. I just ask those that can afford to do so to support me. Either with a subscription to Red Wall and the Rabble or by a one off contribution and buying me a coffee using one of these links.
You can sign up to my newsletter using this link;
redwallandtherabble.co.uk
And buy me a coffee here;
BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnin…
paypal.me/RecusantNine
I represent no political party. I have no side other than the survivors and the communities left abandoned by a political elite. I bring a type of campaigning unique in this space. This is why those in power have desperately tried to silence me.
With the ongoing mainstream media blacklist of my voice, I need your help. Please, if you can, share, subscribe and support the work.
Raja Miah MBE
8
211
498
6,780
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
A PLAN TO KEEP OUR WOMEN SAFE - LOCAL ACTION ON A COUNTRY WIDE BASIS XX
1
13
54
909
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
Sultani Bakatash, 29, an Afghan national, is on trial at Bolton Crown Court accused of raping and sexually assaulting two 14-year-old girls in his flat after plying them with alcohol.
He befriended one of the girls on Snapchat after meeting her at an Asda supermarket when she was 13.
On 6 December last year, he took both girls back to his Bolton flat, encouraged them to drink vodka and Coke until they were drunk and drifting in and out of consciousness, then allegedly raped and abused them despite their resistance.
When they tried to leave he held them down, dragged them across the floor, and took their phones.
They eventually escaped and alerted a neighbour who called police. Bakatash denies two counts of rape, two counts of assault by penetration and one count of sexual assault.
The trial continues.
Jan 13
A man accused of raping two 14-year-old girls has appeared in court.
Sultani Bakatash, 28, appeared at Bolton Crown Court via video link earlier accused of the offences in the Greater Manchester town.
Bakatash did not enter a plea.
Judge Clarke KC adjourned the hearing for a plea and trial preparation hearing on 28 January. He also set a provisional trial date of 8 June.
Bakatash, an Afghan national, of Georgina Court, Bolton, was arrested on 7 December.
He is charged with two counts of rape of a girl aged under 16, and three other charges of sexual assault.
2
15
32
1,610
Karen Rainey retweeted
🚨THIS IS JUDGE LORD JUSTICE TIMOTHY HOLROYDE
This is the judge who REFUSED Lucy Connolly her appeal after she was convicted for a social media post.
Meanwhile this very same judge CUT the sentence of Labour's Lord Ahmed by THREE YEARS after he was convicted of child sex offences. His sentence was reduced to just two and a half years from five and half years.
SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!
1,572
11,974
22,851
203,138
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
A warning about Zack Polanski.
I am deeply concerned by the direction in which he appears to want to take this country.
We are told it is "gut-wrenching" that four pro-Palestinian activists were jailed after taking direct action against an arms supplier linked to Israel. Yet one police officer suffered a devastating spinal injury after being struck with a sledgehammer. Where is the concern for her? Where is the sympathy for the victim?
Then consider another statement Mr Polanski made:
"There are people who identify as right wing or even far right... Do we think we can change their minds or is it a case of building a society that doesn't include them?"
Think carefully about that. A society that doesn't include people because of their political views? Whatever side of the political divide you are on, that should concern you. Democracy depends upon disagreement, debate and freedom of thought.
Now his party is consulting on proposals that could effectively prohibit non-medical circumcision of children until they are old enough to give informed consent. For many Jewish and Muslim families, circumcision is a deeply important religious practice and part of their identity and tradition.
The deeper issue is this: Britain is losing sight of its foundations.
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." (Proverbs 29:2)
"You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness." (Hebrews 1:9)
Christians are called to love what is good and oppose what is evil. Our nation desperately needs moral clarity once again.
When a nation stops believing in God, it does not believe in nothing. It will believe in almost anything.
The next General Election may prove to be one of the most important in our history. The choice before us is not simply Left versus Right. It is whether Britain continues down a path of cultural fragmentation and moral confusion, or whether we begin the long journey back to our Christian roots and the values that shaped this nation for centuries.
Britain has been a Christian nation for over 1,400 years.
Don't let that inheritance slip away.
@ZackPolanski
8
32
97
2,242
Karen Rainey retweeted
This one needs finding before he moves away from filthy phase 1 to a much darker phase 2 or more.🤬
It’s a good picture so please share to get this dangerous bloke caught.🫡
She moved away but he then came up to her and began masturbating.
mylondon.news/news/south-lon…
38
961
955
11,839
Karen Rainey retweeted
You going to share this @Fx1Jonny or is it the wrong colour of skin for you to share?
🚨Breaking News
Man charged for Thursday afternoons double stabbing outside of library on Centenary Square, Birmingham.
Abdulwasi Ahmadi, 22 has been charged with wounding with intent and ABH. He will appear in magistrates court on 15th June.
One victim remains in hospital.
2
10
41
2,296
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
The Court Of Appeal Got This One Right. Palestine Action Is A Proscribed Terrorist Organisation. The Ban Stands.
Five senior judges have ruled what should never have been in doubt. The Government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act was lawful. The High Court's February ruling that it was disproportionate has been overturned. The ban stands.
It is worth recalling what got Palestine Action proscribed in the first place. In June 2025 activists broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged military aircraft with spray paint, an act the Government assessed as causing serious harm to national security. That followed a sustained campaign of break-ins, criminal damage and disruption at defence and industrial sites going back to 2020. Even the High Court judges who ruled the ban disproportionate conceded, in their own words, that a very small number of the group's actions had amounted to terrorist action under the legal definition. Shabana Mahmood put it more plainly. The court acknowledged that Palestine Action has carried out acts of terrorism, celebrated those who carried them out, and promoted the use of violence. That was the High Court's own finding, in the same ruling that called the ban disproportionate.
The proscription was endorsed by Parliament. It followed what the Home Secretary described as a rigorous and evidence-based process. The High Court's objection was not that the underlying conduct was acceptable. It was that the Home Secretary, in the judges' view, had not properly followed her own departmental policy in reaching the decision. A procedural finding was used to try to unwind a substantive judgement that the conduct itself met the threshold for terrorism.
In the months between proscription and this ruling, over 1,600 arrests were made linked to support for the group. Four activists, convicted by a jury of criminal damage, were sentenced as terrorists, a sentencing decision that drew an open letter from more than fifty lawyers and academics objecting to the label. Throughout that period the ban remained legally contested, with protesters outside the Royal Courts of Justice holding placards reading "I'm not a terrorist" while the organisation they supported had already been found, even by the judges who ruled against the Government, to have engaged in terrorist action.
This matters beyond Palestine Action itself. The same week this ruling landed, a Shia cleric with an open paper trail of mourning Hezbollah fighters and glorifying the IRGC walked back into Britain unchallenged, his case sitting in a queue marked "under review." Meanwhile a group that broke into an RAF base and damaged military aircraft came within one judgment of having its terrorist designation quashed entirely, on the basis that the Home Secretary's paperwork had not been completed to the court's satisfaction.
The Court of Appeal has now corrected that. Breaking into a military airbase and disabling aircraft with the explicit aim of disrupting Britain's defence capability is not protest. It is not civil disobedience in the tradition of the causes its supporters like to invoke. It is, in the law's own words, terrorist action. Five judges have now said so unambiguously, and said that the Home Secretary was entitled to act on it.
The law has occasionally been used as a shield for things that plainly should not be shielded. Today it was used correctly. The distinction between a protest movement and a proscribed terrorist organisation is not a technicality, it is the line the Court of Appeal has just redrawn where it always should have been.
"In the months between proscription and this ruling, over 1,600 arrests were made linked to support for the group."
13
133
344
6,954
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 15
Can anyone explain what this means?
£1,893,600 to "Justice in Critical Minerals Governance and Energy Transitions"
"This fellowship responds to the dearth of knowledge that leads to deep contestations over the origins, meaning and purpose of ‘justice’ in the transitions to net zero emissions. It develops a unique methodology called Hermeneutical Ethnography, defined as the collection, co-creation, and analyses of verbal and non-verbal communications, silences and voices (e.g. texts, symbols, speech) to co-create meaning for justice. The methodology offers an exchange of meaning between the producer, author or storyteller and the audience, which if holistically interpreted, allows them to share a deep sense of reality, whether fictional or factual. It enables the collection and analysis of aspirations that would otherwise be restrained in formal research designs. This FLF’s innovative methodology will capture and synthesise the ‘voices’ and ‘silences’ of people who are impacted but would otherwise not be heard in policymaking. Its premise: the impact of the extractive industry on the environment and society causes avoidable losses to biodiversity, livelihoods and socio-political order; inadequate granular data and the unsystematic consideration of local communities’ perspectives in decision-making account for the persistent grievances and violent protests that respond to these impacts."
gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=UK…
32
105
233
5,622
Karen Rainey retweeted
Jun 14
It Took Eight Years to Listen to a Bereaved Father. It Took a By-Election to Act.
Molly Russell died in November 2017. Her father has spent the years since asking governments of both colours to act on the algorithms that fed his fourteen-year-old daughter suicide content until she took her own life. Eight years. The most recent stage of that process was a three-month consultation that closed last month, attracting some 100,000 responses. The Prime Minister told bereaved parents gathered in Downing Street that responding properly would be challenging given the volume, and that he would move as fast as possible by the summer recess.
That timeline has now collapsed to days. On Monday Starmer will announce what he calls a "game-changing" ban on under-16s using social media, complete with facial age scans, curfews for teenagers and restrictions on addictive features. The announcement lands three days before the Makerfield by-election, in which Andy Burnham, the man positioning himself to challenge Starmer for the Labour leadership, is standing as the party's candidate.
Ian Russell does not believe this is a coincidence. He told the Telegraph there was "no reason other than maybe a by-election in Makerfield" for the sudden acceleration, and called it "political opportunism." From a man who buried his fourteen-year-old daughter and has spent eight years pleading with successive governments for exactly this kind of action, the word "disgraceful" carries weight no opposition politician could match.
What makes the timing more damning is the evidence Russell is citing against it. Australia introduced its own under-16s ban in December 2025. Six months on, six in ten Australian under-16s remain on the banned platforms because the tech companies have failed to enforce it and children have found ways around it. Russell's own charity, the Molly Rose Foundation, has just published research showing 47 percent of girls aged 13 to 17 are still being shown high-risk content relating to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders every week, under the existing Online Safety Act that was supposed to have already fixed this. Ofcom admits nine in ten children aged 8 to 12 are using platforms with a minimum age of 13, because nobody enforces the limit that already exists.
Russell's argument is not that nothing should be done. It is that the government is choosing a headline-grabbing ban it knows does not work, over the harder regulatory work, forcing platforms to redesign addictive features, that experts say would. He fears that when the ban unravels as it has in Australia, the Prime Minister will be left asking why nobody warned him in advance. They did. This week.
There is a precedent for how fast this government can move when it chooses to. Liz Kendall's powers to remove "incendiary" online content during a "crisis" went from announcement to legislation within forty-eight hours. Jonathan Hall, the government's own terror watchdog, raised the national security implications of mass migration through proper channels and received silence that has now lasted for weeks, in the same period that Belfast burned. Eighty-seven thousand four hundred and fifty people sit in the asylum appeals backlog, a figure larger than the population of Carlisle, with no comparable urgency attached to it at all.
Two different forms of harm to children and to the country. One produced legislation in two days. The other has waited eight years and counting, and finally moved only once a leadership rival's name appeared on a ballot paper. The question Ian Russell is too polite to ask directly is the one that matters most. What, precisely, does this government consider urgent, and for whose benefit?
"Ian Russell does not believe this is a coincidence. He told the Telegraph there was "no reason other than maybe a by-election in Makerfield" for the sudden acceleration, and called it "political opportunism.""
21
204
478
19,404