CHARLIE'S MOLE IS MISSING!!! except no... It's there. It's just hard to see because the colors are a bit washed out in the video and it's not superb quality. When you add level adjustments in Photoshop to create contrast it's right there where it should be.

Questions regarding your claims that you see these noise patterns as "airbrushed" or "fluid FPS motion" which is indicative of AI video: 1. Why are you analyzing a heavily downscaled 480x270 version instead of the original 1280x720 video uploaded by @charliespiering ? From what I'm seeing in your analysis attachments, your your frame size is only 480x270 pixels. The original should be 1280x720. Downscaling introduces additional artifacts and removes important detail needed for proper frequency analysis. 2. Why are you using the Temporal tab Local Flicker Check to diagnose supposed spatial AI hallucinations? The Local Flicker Check is used to detect temporal inconsistencies (brightness/color changes between frames). The blue “Assist Image” overlays are simply Neat Video’s visualization for tuning the temporal filter. They are not the actual video content and do not indicate AI airbrushing or generative patterns. Official Neat Video documentation confirms this: neatvideo.com/blog/post/flic… 3. Why not use the proper tool for Spatial Noise Analysis (the Spatial tab Y Channel Frequencies)? When analyzed correctly on the original file with all reduction set to 0%, the patterns are clearly blocky, especially visible around text and the hand. This indicates lossy compression, not soft, wavy, organic AI hallucinatory textures. Conclusion Your analysis over-interprets the temporal diagnostic tool and mislabels common lossy compression behavior as AI-specific. My analysis using the original resolution file, Neat Video 6.1.3, Spatial Filter, and Y-Channel Frequencies shows consistent evidence of compression artifacts from a real camera source.Neat Video is not an AI detection tool, and neither is the Local Flicker Check. Would you like to revise your assessment and retract the claim (originally made by @FreddyMacUSA) that “The Charlie Kirk video…is 100% verified AI-manipulated”? For transparency, I've attached my screenshots and I'll even tag @NeatVideo if they would like to comment. To Neat Video: If you find my claims accurate, please consider replying to the original misleading post spread to over 50k users on X here: x.com/FreddyMacUSA/status/20…

Apparently it was not Eddie representing this company here rather this guy. Literally didn’t even see his comment so he must have insta-blocked me right after he made it. Problem for him, he lied too. I never spammed their company 30 messages, rather I simply made a post exposing their flawed analysis and claims. Proof: x.com/i/grok/share/d…

Maybe now is also the time I reveal how I really exposed the flawed forensic analysis by @alteredstatedtx and @FreddyMacUSA. Both used a similar analysis using Neat Video (a software plugin) as justification for AI manipulated suspicion of the Aspen video. Freddy outright claimed it was 100% proof the video was AI. Altered State Productions were a little more careful with their words and claimed the spatial noise patterns were consistent with AI (which I also proved wrong). Freddy quickly blocked me before I could respond to his shade. In fact, the first time Altered State Productions published their analysis was on a @ProjectConstitu post involving Freddy’s initial dramatized sloppy video. Remember that for now. Project Constitution then shared Freddy’s video and used it as justification for claiming the Aspen video was AI (hundreds of thousands of views). But then I also caught Altered State Productions in another interesting lie and form of obfuscation. Altered State Productions claimed to not be political after I had tagged @NeatVideo in my rebuttal to their analysis. It seemed they were worried about looking bad in front of this company for some reason and listed the names of what appeared to be employees speaking directly to them. I have yet to hear a public response from Neat Video. Might also note Altered State Productions also blocked me following my very reasonable inquiry. However, before they even made the comment, I noticed Altered State Productions were following three notable political figures and no more. Those were @RealCandaceO, @imelizabethlane, and @LauraLoomer. Coincidental group I told myself. When I responded to their comment of avoidance in getting into politics by citing Elizabeth Lane, it appeared Altered State Productions unfollowed Candace and Loomer. One has to ask, what is really going on here?

Apparently it was not Eddie representing this company here rather this guy. Literally didn’t even see his comment so he must have insta-blocked me right after he made it. Problem for him, he lied too. I never spammed their company page 30 messages, rather I simply made a post exposing their flawed analysis and claims. Proof: x.com/i/grok/share/d…