BREAKING: Netherlands House of Representatives has approved a sweeping measure imposing a 36% tax on unrealized capital gains across stocks, cryptocurrencies, and bonds. The decision marks a significant shift in fiscal philosophy within Netherlands, signaling a move away from traditional taxation based solely on realized profits toward a more assertive state claim over paper wealth. Historically, moments like this echo earlier eras when governments, facing structural economic pressures, expanded their reach into private capital. From post-war reconstruction levies in Europe to modern wealth tax experiments, the pattern remains consistent: when states confront widening inequality and volatile markets, they redraw the boundary between private accumulation and public obligation. This latest vote now places the Netherlands at the forefront of a contentious global debate over how far governments should go in taxing wealth that exists on balance sheets rather than in cash.

$Worldcup The real variable is whether the token becomes the default financial proxy for an attention stream that already exists independently of crypto. The $Worldcup will command billions of eyeballs regardless of what happens in the market. The token's job is simply to position itself close enough to that gravitational field to absorb a fraction of the attention, speculation & liquidity. What makes these situations difficult to model is that attention itself can become the asset. Once enough participants start treating the token as the easiest expression of a global event, fundamentals become secondary and reflexivity takes over. People buy because others believe attention will keep flowing, and attention keeps flowing because people are buying. The key question is no longer how valuable is $WORLDCUP? but rather how much of the season world cup's emotional energy can $WORLDCUP monetize before attention moves elsewhere? History shows that markets often underestimate attention while it is building and overestimate it once everyone has noticed. The challenge is identifying where on that curve we are today.

CLUSTERS ANALYSIS If I am stepping into a meme token, the first thing I study is the structure of supply concentration through clusters. A clean setup in my view looks like this: Visible Clusters: below 10% Hidden Clusters: around 5–8% Others: above 60%. For example: Visible Clusters = 4% Hidden Clusters = 6% Others = 68% That kind of distribution signals a healthier spread of supply. Power is not sitting in a few coordinated hands & the risk of a synchronized dump is significantly reduced. But once you start seeing something like: Visible Clusters = 20% Hidden Clusters = 15% Others = 35% that structure becomes a red flag. It points to heavy wallet linkage and coordinated exposure, where nearly half the supply is effectively influenced by connected entities. In simple terms, the thinner the clusters & the wider the others, the cleaner the token distribution looks.

$TAO The market spent years trying to identify the Bitcoin of decentralized AI. Increasingly the conversation keeps circling back to $TAO... A permissionless network. A global intelligence marketplace. No central gatekeepers. No single point of failure... If Bitcoin decentralized money, $TAO is making a compelling case for decentralizing intelligence.

$WORLDCUP Many people have already concluded that $Worldcup token cannot make another meaningful move after the pullback that followed Mexico's opening match. I think that conclusion is premature. The market does not reward assumptions, it responds to attention, participation & volume. What I see is a token that continues to attract strong volume despite the recent retracement. That is not the behavior of an asset that has completely exhausted its narrative. More importantly, most of the major national teams have not even played their first matches yet. The period we are entering from tomorrow is when the tournament truly begins to capture global attention. As the bigger fixtures arrive, so will the narratives, engagement & speculation that often drive momentum. This coming week deserves close attention. If the current volume profile remains intact, World Cup Token may still have a few surprises left for those who have already written it off.

There is this widespread assumption that anyone you see deploying serious capital into crypto today must have made their money from airdrops or mining. That narrative is simply not accurate. One of the reasons many of our people still misunderstand the crypto space is because they refuse to see it as a legitimate profession or industry. They assume every successful participant stumbled into free money through an airdrop or mining rewards. But when exactly did airdrops and mining become the primary source of wealth creation in crypto? Anyone who experienced the 2020/2021 bull run knows the reality. Nearly everyone who made significant money came in with capital. They took risks, deployed funds, and positioned themselves correctly when the market turned bullish. I remember a friend of mine in 2021. I was guiding him through crypto at the time. He came to me ready to deploy $10,000, despite barely understanding the basics of buying and selling. I advised him to start with just $1,000 instead. Even today, there are people committing substantial amounts of capital to the market. The truth is simple: in today's crypto market, capital matters. Luck can open doors, but sustainable success rarely comes without investment. And if one is not careful, the market has a way of collecting tuition fees through endless cycles of losses. Whether the capital is large or small, this is not a market for careless participation. Not financial advice.

Elon Musk officially becomes the first TRILLIONAIRE in human history.

$Goblintown In the end, the large wallets that had become a persistent overhang on Goblintown have finally exited. Wallets such as Pro Wallet which many investors viewed as a source of uncertainty have now sold & moved on. The reality is that before any token can make a meaningful move to higher levels, these frustrating supply overhangs often need to be cleared out. That process appears to be unfolding before our eyes. If there was ever a time I considered Goblintown worth accumulating, it is now. The wallets that many believed were holding back price discovery are no longer in the picture. Mark this post. In the coming days, I will revisit it...

$GOBLINTOWN SZN

@OpenAI — y’all built the future with agents, now solopreneurs & small teams are running full Goblintown mode 🔥 Goblintown is the open-source multi-agent orchestration protocol on top of OpenAI: • A pack of Goblins races tasks in parallel • Gremlin brutally attacks weak outputs • Troll arbitrates for truth & quality • Raccoon scavenges context & memory Decomposes prompts into a planning DAG, spawns specialists when needed, and delivers signed, verifiable results FAST. No need for a full Chief AI Officer salary — just deploy your own AI horde. Perfect for 2026: content, trading, automation, research, whatever you’re grinding. Who’s running their Goblintown pack already? Drop your setups 👇 Try it: github.com/0xbl33p/goblintow… $GOBLINTOWN #AI #MultiAgent #OpenAI #NeverQuit

James Wynn’s Bitcoin Bet Keeps Bleeding James Wynn’s aggressive 40x leveraged BTC short position has been partially liquidated once again. According to on-chain data monitored by Onchain Lens, Wynn’s position suffered another liquidation event on June 10. Despite the setback, he continues to hold the trade, with the remaining position currently valued at approximately $86,100. This serves as another reminder of the dangers of excessive leverage in crypto trading. While leverage can amplify profits, it can also accelerate losses and liquidations when the market moves against you. Many traders focus on potential gains, but risk management is what keeps you in the game long enough to capitalize on future opportunities. Lesson: In crypto, surviving is often more important than winning a single trade. Would you ever take a 40x leveraged position, or is that simply gambling? Source: SoSoValue / Onchain Lens

$Goblintown At this stage, one of the major factors holding Goblintown back is the concentration of supply in the hands of a few large holders who have shown little willingness to reduce their positions. Take "AbdulR" now operating as "ProWallet" for example. He alone controls roughly 4% of the total supply alongside several other large holders whose identities remain unknown to the broader community. This is not a sustainable situation if the goal is to attract serious investors & unlock the project full potential. Large supply concentrations create hesitation among prospective buyers & weigh heavily on market confidence. If any of these holders are reading this, I urge them to consider reducing their positions for the greater good of the ecosystem. The reality is that @AngusDurrie and @0xbl33p continue to put in the work day and night. Their commitment to building has never been in doubt. The community too, is doing its part to support and promote the project. The foundation is being laid. The effort is there. What remains is for market participants to act in a manner that strengthens confidence rather than undermines it. As always, the decision rests with each individual investor.

In 2026, I heard someone say they had been blacklisted and it surprised me. One of the key advantages of launchpads is that they help protect users from risky tokens by ensuring a certain level of security review before launch. That is why tokens launched through platforms such as Pump.fun, LetsBonk, BagFM, FourMeme and similar launchpads generally do not have major security concerns regarding their smart contracts. It is important to understand the difference between a token being traded on PumpSwap & a token being launched through Pump.fun. Just because a token is listed on PumpSwap does not mean it is free from security risks. However, tokens that originate from Pump.fun have their contract addresses automatically reviewed and audited as part of the launch process.. PumpSwap itself is simply a marketplace, similar to other Solana based decentralized exchanges (DEXs) such as Raydium, Meteora & Orca.. In summary, our people should be cautious. Seeing a token on PumpSwap does not automatically mean it is secure. Always do your own research and verify the security of any token before investing.

$Goblintown There is something in crypto that continues to amaze me: the extent to which some market participants will go when their bags are on the line. Three secured a partnership with IBM & deservedly that milestone propelled the token to a market cap of over $16M. Long before that became public knowledge, however, one of Goblintown's developers @0xbl33p had maintained a strong relationship with @IBM for years. Discussions around a potential collaboration between Goblintown and IBM had been ongoing with the goal of exploring how IBM could support the project's growth. Yet the moment news of Goblintown's own partnership discussions surfaced, sections of the Three community launched a campaign against @0xbl33p. They questioned his motives, attacked his character & attempted to paint him as someone acting out of jealousy. What is most disappointing is how quickly some people abandon reason when they believe it will benefit the token they hold. In the pursuit of price appreciation, they become willing participants in misinformation, character assassination, and reputation attacks. But markets are temporary. Reputations endure. The truth has a way of asserting itself & in the coming days, facts not narratives will speak for themselves.

I said this yesterday when Goblintown was trading significantly higher, and I’ll say it again: I do not care about the token’s price. The token was created around me and my work. I hold no supply, I do not profit from it, and I direct creator rewards to contributors who help build and improve the repository. I am not the deployer of the coin. That said, I expect IBM to rectify the situation. Their initial response brought Goblintown to the attention of many people who had never heard of it before, which ultimately achieved the intended goal. However, it also created unintended consequences. After IBM deleted its post, a large number of people began closely tracking the token and accumulated supply purely to farm attention and speculation. The token reached a $1.2M market cap before being heavily farmed down to roughly $400K. More importantly, this project is larger than any token chart. Contributors such as @AngusDurrie have invested substantial time and effort into the repository, and others have already begun building on top of the work. As they contribute value, they will be compensated accordingly. The goal of Goblintown has always been to attract developers interested in building on a unique agentic framework, advancing open-source architecture, and exploring new approaches to autonomous systems. There was never a bundled launch, no coordinated supply control, and no centralized allocation on my end. I did not launch the coin, nor did I control its distribution. What makes the growth particularly noteworthy is how organic it has been. The project has attracted attention, contributors, and participation without the mechanisms typically used to manufacture demand or concentrate ownership. That is an impressive outcome in its own right. I am proud of how well it’s done. @AngusDurrie has not stopped working. Others have no stopped working. Focus on the repo, not the coin.

¡No te lo puedes perder! 👀👇 barca.link/hFwg50Z7J5g

Another token I would recommend buying because I believe it has the potential to surprise many people and generate significant profits: $HTTPS. The developer behind this token @PumpaMeta is only 24 years old. He quit his job and launched the token in December of last year. At one point, the token reached a market capitalization of $4M market cap. However, as is often the case with Solana degens, the token was heavily dumped and its market cap fell to just $9K. Despite this setback, the developer did not give up. He spent months consistently sharing his story & explaining what happened. Today, the project is attracting a lot of attention & many people are watching it closely. If you have the means, it may be worth doing your own research and considering an investment. One thing that has become clear is that the developer appears genuinely committed to building the project rather than simply trying to scam investors. Ca: 7sGdNQSvUGpahh6qyXB3g5gsdK9FAzZM299KyCXspump

Goblintown You often see me talking about this tech-focused token. $Goblintown is not just another meme coin that gets pumped and dumped. The developers, Oxbleep and Angus, are putting in a tremendous amount of work on the Goblintown repository. By the time they complete what they are building, I believe the token could deliver significant value, God willing. As always, if we see an opportunity, we will continue to share it with you. Also, make sure to follow their handle, @Goblintownforum to stay updated with the latest developments. CA: DJ15QJxVPFGv6kYhT6LvDGqG9b4aBFWQzavA7dGxpump

The world has changed. There was a time when if the BSC News handle mentioned a projectespecially a meme coin it would pump within a short period. Likewise, if you were looking for a token to hold or trade for a quick profit, all you had to do was see one of their posts and buy in. Today, many of us have completely forgotten about that handle. Its influence has faded, and it no longer has the impact it once had.

From $TON to Gram... Telegram is set to rename its native/governance token on the TON network from TON (Telegram Open Network) to Gram. Telegram founder and CEO, @durov, announced the change today as part of a series of updates and reforms being introduced across the TON ecosystem. Note: Historically, Gram was the original cryptocurrency associated with Telegram's blockchain project before it became known as TON.