On this platform, the people decide the narrative. You hear all sides of an argument. Community Notes corrects everyone, no exceptions. Notes data & code is public source. Grok provides further fact-checking.

aunty ye dekho who are you to save sanatan?

While you may choose to dismiss the notice and mock the process, let it be made absolutely clear, mocking Indian values, culture, and Sanatan Dharma is not without consequences. What you call sarcasm is, in reality, a targeted insult, and we do not take it lightly. Sanatan Dharma has withstood centuries of invasions, distortions, and bigotry, and it will not bow to your selective outrage or veiled contempt. Legal action is not a threat; it is a duty we owe to Dharma and to justice. Since you seem unfamiliar with the legal process, let me walk you through it, not because I seek your validation as a “good lawyer” (I don’t), but so there’s no ambiguity. Before approaching the court, a formal police complaint is filed, which is already in process. Once procedural requirements are met, we will move to the appropriate legal forum. We will see you in court. 🙂

His Cunning Defense Exposed in Reply to Rejoinder (June 2025): Hiding Behind “Art”: Deftly calls mocking Pahalgam attack (26 deaths) “satire,” evading accountability for hurting victims’ families. Misusing Free Speech: Claims Article 19(1)(a) shields insulting @AmitShah Ji and calling Bharat a “fucking country,” ignoring legal boundaries. Deflecting Blame: Equates his comedy to political rallies, sidestepping his insults to Bharat Mata & Maatru Devo Pitru Devo Bhava. Arrogant Legal Taunt: Invites lawsuits, relying on followers’ support to amplify fame, showing no remorse. Deceptive Political Ploy: Challenges us to file cases against 3 politicians for hate speech to remove the video, a blatant diversion. Mocking Culture: Dismisses Sanatana Dharma & Vedic values as “references,” scorning Hindu sentiments. His cunning weaves legal jargon & manipulative tactics to dodge responsibility. His followers’ vile comments mirror his crass comedy, deepening the hurt. We urge Indians to reject this deceit & uphold #BharatMata #CulturalRespect. Legal action awaits if he defies the deadline. @SanatanPrabhat @OpIndia_com @SanjeevSanskrit

I would suggest that hiding behind sarcasm does not absolve one from accountability. Mocking terror attacks, demeaning Bharat Mata, and ridiculing Sanatan values isn’t satire, it’s a conscious insult to millions. And if you're genuinely concerned about online abuse, I hope you’re equally vocal when Hindus are mocked, abused, or threatened, including in your own content. Let’s not deflect. Let’s be honest.

Mr. Danial Fernandes (@absolutelydanny), We, Adv. Makarand D. Adkar (@AdkarMakarand) & Adv. Amita Sachdeva, have sent you a notice dated May 30, 2025, regarding your offensive YouTube video "The Kashmir Terror Attack youtube.com/watch?v=3xALPKtw…… and X post dated April 14, 2025. The content insults cultural values, stereotypes India, and trivialises the Pahalgam terror attack, deeply hurting public sentiments. Objectionable statements: 1. YouTube (4:07–4:21): Mocks Union Home Minister @AmitShah Ji, questioning his competence and undermining governance trust post-attack. 2. YouTube (9:28–9:45): Labels India as a “hate-filled” nation, damaging its global image and offending citizens valuing unity. 3. YouTube (16:09–16:57): Calls citizens “insects” and suggests they crave violence, insulting India’s peace advocacy. 4. YouTube (22:21–23:15): Jokes about nuclear war solving the Kashmir issue, trivializing the conflict and disrespecting victims. 5. YouTube (21:33–22:02): Defames journalist Arnab Goswami (@republic) with violent imagery, attacking media credibility. 6. YouTube (20:00–20:02): Makes light of the Pahalgam attack’s 26 deaths, joking about family members being “shot,” causing emotional harm. 7. X Post: Uses profanity (“fucking country”), blames parents for societal issues, and mocks sacred values like Matru Devo Bhava, offending cultural reverence. We urge you to remove the video and post by June 3, 2025, to avoid legal action. Let’s restore comedy’s dignity by fostering unity, not division. #ResponsibleComedy #RespectCulture

This reflects the level to which comedian @absolutelydanny has stretched the idea of freedom of expression.