for the longest time every cryptocurrency simply followed the trend of the majors like $BTC and ethereum:native rarely standing on their own trends but hyperliquid:native sits in a unique position being a newer token and ecosystem that just activated its tradfi rails which could lead to independent inflow that could easily outweigh the liquidity entanglement of the broader crypto markets not to mention the ridiculous amount of buying pressure that today's deal will generate on top of the fees it already generates, this buy pressure will happen regardless of volume/activity which also happens to be growing at a period of stagnation and decline for almost every other protocol/chain the heavy accumulation today in hyperliquid:native should continue while most other tokens saw a brief rally with the clarity act which imo is more or less a sell the news event hyperliquid has without a doubt captured the #1 use-case of crypto by becoming the defacto platform where quite literally everything can be traded and is being traded the circle/coinbase deal solidified this fact as no other competitor has come close to securing a deal like hyperliquid:native while also solidifying that it is indeed an oracle for price discovery for nasdaq and quite frankly is now directly competing with nasdaq there is quite literally no other blockchain/perp platform that is on hyperliquid's level and the gap will gorw throughout the rest of the year as they continue to innovate and build on top of their existing infrastructure the greatest fumble every crypto-trader has made this cycle was not trading on hyperliquid and getting the opportunity to collect generational wealth for simply trading personally I didn't do it because I was lazy and it has been one of the costliest mistakes of my time in this space imo hyperliquid will continue to be a liquidity black hole for all competitors and grow in marketcap as it takes its rightful place in the top 5 tokens of this industry there is simply no competition

there seems to be a lot of confusion in the $HYPE community about how Open Interest works and what the point of my recent posts are IMO this is not a good thing and it is BETTER to correct this mistake for the long term value of $HYPE apparently this has been discussed in the past and the decision was to continue to report it incorrectly? why exactly would such a retarded conclusion be made? 95% of the posts on X are of ppl who don't understand what OI even means and are posting metrics that are not real and now as @HyperliquidX is trying to appeal to the new marginal buyers Tradfi, how can you believe that showing Open Interest incorrectly is good? this is quite literally retarded, it's not apples and oranges and if users are confused they need to be educated there is no such thing as "Double-Sided Open Interest" looks like Bybit who also used this retarded methodology quietly changed their OI to the CORRECT math recently announcements.bybit.com/en/a… the simplest way to understand how wrong double-counting OI imagine selling a house but you count the house as sold for both the buyer and seller and reporting it as 2 houses sold for each 1 house it's simply RETARDED and there is nothing apples/oranges about it hyperliquid

following up on this for anyone else looking to move off copilot after the retarded price changes devin-desktop(prev windsurf) I found to be quite clunky/buggy but the automation features sound interesting and I'm stuck /w a subscription for a month so gonna mess around with it at some point cursor is basically a straight up vscode fork in editor-mode so didn't need to read through a bunch of docs and felt at home after importing settings the agents-UI seems to be where cursor separates itself but personally I don't run a bunch of parallel agents at the same time for much of anything these days if ur running bills above $200 /mo on copilot it's cheaper to transition to cursor since you get $400 base credit "Composer 2.5" looks interesting, it's their inhouse model based off Kimi K2.5 base /w additional training that's 1/10th the price of GPT 5.5 and looks like it is comparable performance and possibly edges GPT 5.4 (gonna experiment with this) surprised Fable is only 2x the cost of Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5, maybe I'll take it for a spin after-all looks like I'll be making @cursor_ai my new daily IDE 🤔

read through the devin desktop previously windsurf docs and set it up only to end up not using it at all signed up for cursor now, time to see what all the hype is about

it's pretty clear that 95% of $HYPE users that post about Open Interest on X are literally retarded and don't understand what Open Interest actually is u guys should stop posting about something u don't understand at all all the replies to my posts are braindead and they think im some kind of hater when 99% of my $HYPE posts are positive about the ecosystem

i haven't tried fable nor do i care to try it also have not seen anything that makes me curious to try it just the usual anthropic slop on X every time they release a new model

how can any serious researcher or analyst take $HYPE's data seriously when the Open Interest is incorrectly counted how can anyone take a researcher or analyst seriously when they don't seem to understand how Open Interest works it is far better that the data is correct and accurately represented than inflated and misrepresented honestly if this is not corrected over the long term im not sure how seriously I can take the platform and any professional investor will think the same it will always be a thorn in the discussion because there is absolutely no fcken reason to double the count hyperliquid

one of the main reasons I aligned with $HYPE was due to its transparency and no bullshit approach misrepresenting data or marketing data selectively with bias are traits I genuinely hate, something that $SOL constantly does with their fluff and marketing (annoying as fck) double-counting Open Interest is exactly as it sounds, it is doubling the number for no reason but to simply make it larger this damages and weakens everything that $HYPE stands for imo you can't say the data is clean when one of the most important metrics that ppl look at is clearly incorrect and being spread around everywhere the longer this remains true, the more damage it does imo hyperliquid

some of u may think I'm "fudding my own bags" or something along these lines but the reality is that all of you who continue to spread incorrect data are the ones who are fudding everyone's bags think about this, there is nothing for anyone to gain from misrepresenting data hyperliquid

you can't build the INTERNET OF MONEY when you can't even do basic math it's honestly that simple

I now have two points of criticism for the @HyperliquidX team 1. Governance and how voting works should be clearly documented with its own section in the gitbook 2. Open Interest calculations should be following industry standard, this is very amateur and could be seen as purposefully inflating data hyperliquid

personally for me as a $HYPE supporter I'm going to start correcting everyone misreporting Open Interest until it is fixed I suggest for all of u to do the same if you actually care about the future of $HYPE hyperliquid

i like $SPCX and what it represents but hard to see how this thing is going to keep running up where are the bids going to come from if retail is already in? markets seeing very little activity/vol over the weekend is also not very surprising and adds to my sentiment imo $SPCX is more likely to go down towards $135-$150 than $180-195 from its current price of $165 if I had to make up numbers, think 75% down and 25% up is where I would put it

Alex Pereira's weigh-ins through the years 185 lbs ➡️ 205 lbs ➡️ 251 lbs 🤯

HIP-4 settlements have now surpassed $50M in total volume, with more than 10.2K unique traders participating.

derivative markets like the pre-ipo markets on $HYPE have clear product market fit that has quite literally been proven on the world's biggest stage yet again with the LARGEST IPO to date $SPCX these markets are simple instruments that allow market participants to express their views/opinions on price and putting these on immutable decentralized permissionless systems actually make sense unlike "tokenized stocks" it should be no surprise that perps dominate in liquidity and activity vs any form of tokenized stocks the latter is completely retarded and useless hyperliquid

here are my thoughts on why "tokenized stocks" are quite literally retarded they are basically tokens that are bundling a bunch of legal rights that belong in permissioned centralized systems where they already exist /the end

thinking the persians will gift trump the satisfaction of delivering peace on his literal bday is honestly retarded the probability of any peace signings this weekend is practically NULL war on/war off will likely pick back up on Monday and throughout the summer

decided to try devin/windsurf over cursor first going to read through the docs and test it out on hyperpulse 🤔