I expect (vs predict) that there will be a 9/11-level event (causing grievous harm to >thousands of people) that will change the direction of AI policy in ways that are genuinely unforeseeable right now. Biosecurity is a strong candidate for the vector, though there are others.
So much of our biosecurity infrastructure is built around assuming we will retain the moats / signals of suspicious activity we've relied on in the path.
That is very, very unlikely.
Biosecurity, not job loss, remains my expected cause of a strong AI backlash.