You misunderstand me, Learned Silk. Actually, the tweet reduced the OP to income alone (even though I understand his perspective well), and that's why I decided to speak on it. In fact, the tweet literally supposes you could have everything else, but “what if?” And that is very okay and has strong basis.
My point, again, is that it has never been our legislation's mainstream—and it will never be. It's never been this obvious (even if it has always been this worse) that after these dissolutions, women without sources of income bear the brunt of it mostly. And that is exactly why I said an income source is not the point; instead, she must have some skill...some capacity to sustain herself if the need arises. She must have something to give, even if she never monetized it while she was married and had her needs catered for.
I get your point, but the OP didn’t reduce preparedness to income alone. Nothing in what he said dismisses character, religious commitment, emotional maturity, or the other qualities you mentioned. Islam does not prohibit women from earning. I would even say it shouldn’t just be “some income source” but something stable and consistent. Allah is perfect but Muslims are not, and we live in a reality where financial security matters for women. And praying for a good spouse doesn’t even cut it. It is good, very important but a generic oversimplification of the issue.