But what do I know? I thought bhangra was going to be the next big thing.

Joined May 2010
101 Photos and videos
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
RAINBOW: THE MISSING PIECES (Director David Lynch, 1989)
10
41
217
12,050
Right. This is the *only* post I'm retweeting on this turbulent day.
All the takes are correct and yet they also miss the point. Yes, it was insane for the Democrats to think they could win by running a soulless candidate, without a shred of progressive policy vision, pursuing endorsements from neocon war-hawks everybody hates, while arming and funding a genocide, and belittling and crushing those who have enough morality to protest it.  It is enraging that the Democrats are so smug and blind to this. But these are all just symptoms.  The deeper reality is that liberalism has failed, liberalism is dead, and people urgently need to wake up to this fact and respond accordingly. It is a defunct ideology that cannot offer any meaningful solutions to our social and ecological crises and it must be abandoned. Democrats have proven over and over again that they cannot accept even *basic* steps like public healthcare, affordable housing, and a public job guarantee - things that would dramatically improve the material, social and political conditions of the working classes. And they cannot accept a public finance strategy that would steer production away from fossil fuels and toward green transition to give us a shot at a liveable future. Why? Because these things run against the objectives of capital accumulation. And for liberals capital is sacrosanct. They will do whatever it takes to ensure elite accumulation, it is their only consistent commitment.  At home, they suppress and demonize progressive and socialist tendencies. Abroad, they engage in endless wars and violence to suppress input prices in the global South and prevent any possibility of sovereign economic development. The Democrats have done all this purposefully and knowingly, for my whole life, not as some kind of "mistake" but in full consciousness that it is in the interests of capital. And because liberalism cannot address our crises, and because it crushes socialist alternatives, it inevitably paves the way for right-wing populism.  They know this pattern, and yet they risk it every time - this election being only the most recent example. They did it in 2016, when they actively crushed the Sanders campaign and sent Trump to the White House. They do it because ultimately they (and I mean the liberal ruling class here) don't really mind if fascists take power, so long as the latter too ensure the conditions for capital accumulation. They 100% prefer this to the possibility of a socialist alternative. So, progressives have to face reality. The dream of "converting" the Democratic party is dead. This is now a fact and it must be accepted. The only option is to build a mass-based movement that can reclaim the working classes and mobilize a political vehicle that can integrate disparate progressive struggles into a unified and formidable political force and achieve substantive transformation. This will take real work, actual organizing, but it must be done and that process must begin now.
2
180
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
All the takes are correct and yet they also miss the point. Yes, it was insane for the Democrats to think they could win by running a soulless candidate, without a shred of progressive policy vision, pursuing endorsements from neocon war-hawks everybody hates, while arming and funding a genocide, and belittling and crushing those who have enough morality to protest it.  It is enraging that the Democrats are so smug and blind to this. But these are all just symptoms.  The deeper reality is that liberalism has failed, liberalism is dead, and people urgently need to wake up to this fact and respond accordingly. It is a defunct ideology that cannot offer any meaningful solutions to our social and ecological crises and it must be abandoned. Democrats have proven over and over again that they cannot accept even *basic* steps like public healthcare, affordable housing, and a public job guarantee - things that would dramatically improve the material, social and political conditions of the working classes. And they cannot accept a public finance strategy that would steer production away from fossil fuels and toward green transition to give us a shot at a liveable future. Why? Because these things run against the objectives of capital accumulation. And for liberals capital is sacrosanct. They will do whatever it takes to ensure elite accumulation, it is their only consistent commitment.  At home, they suppress and demonize progressive and socialist tendencies. Abroad, they engage in endless wars and violence to suppress input prices in the global South and prevent any possibility of sovereign economic development. The Democrats have done all this purposefully and knowingly, for my whole life, not as some kind of "mistake" but in full consciousness that it is in the interests of capital. And because liberalism cannot address our crises, and because it crushes socialist alternatives, it inevitably paves the way for right-wing populism.  They know this pattern, and yet they risk it every time - this election being only the most recent example. They did it in 2016, when they actively crushed the Sanders campaign and sent Trump to the White House. They do it because ultimately they (and I mean the liberal ruling class here) don't really mind if fascists take power, so long as the latter too ensure the conditions for capital accumulation. They 100% prefer this to the possibility of a socialist alternative. So, progressives have to face reality. The dream of "converting" the Democratic party is dead. This is now a fact and it must be accepted. The only option is to build a mass-based movement that can reclaim the working classes and mobilize a political vehicle that can integrate disparate progressive struggles into a unified and formidable political force and achieve substantive transformation. This will take real work, actual organizing, but it must be done and that process must begin now.
685
13,201
46,121
3,079,738
Oh, I am so slow. It's only now dawning on me that the TVA is basically this, isn't it?
1
111
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
Absolutely delighted with this review of The Torments - thank you @almabbott
The sequel to Michael Malone's bestselling gothic thriller is a chiller heraldscotland.com/life_styl… @michaelJmalone1 @OrendaBooks
1
3
9
579
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
The Burryman is oot and aboot..
1
11
32
2,447
Being too young to watch it first time around, I've now finished "Callan" - and was thrilled to see the Poole Pottery twintone tea & coffee set make no fewer than three separate appearances in series 4. Kudos to the Thames TV props dept. My old mum would have been well chuffed.
2
2
141
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
Loved him as Sherlock.
59
608
8,495
603,368
Today I'm being the "if you know, you know" guy.
1
4
92
Such a great send-off. RIP William Russell, who was there at the very beginning.
"I shall miss them, yes I shall miss them".
2
3
232
So I picked this up for four quid yesterday. Is it going to become my new "Lipstick Traces"? #folk
1
1
93
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
Just when you thought you’d heard it all
39
11
57
97,055
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
11 May 2024
You don’t see dogs legging it out of a butchers with a string of sausages anymore. Just another thing woke has taken from us
112
2,912
39,337
1,296,699
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
Replying to @robinallender
Friend's mum: So who are you going to see tonight? Friend: John Cale. You wouldn't have heard of him. Mum: Big nose, plays the viola? Friend: What?? How do you know? Mum: We were in the same youth orchestra...
1
8
278
9,394
That's brilliant. I would never have noticed that.
76
I've seen some ridiculous opinions expressed in my time, but the eclipse of April 2024 must mark the most visible display of human idiocy and willful ignorance ever recorded.
101
Alastair Mabbott retweeted
A woman, unable to get an abortion due to deadly anti-abortion laws had to carry to term a baby that was found to have no kidneys at 24 weeks. I’ll say that part again, no kidneys and was forced to carry the baby for an additional 13 weeks until she gave birth. Deborah Dorbert’s son Milo died in her arms shortly after birth just like the doctors said would happen. Forced to carry, knowing there was no chance of survival. Then watching a baby gasp for air and die. What part of that scenario is pro-life? The walking around for 13 weeks knowing your baby is going to die? Oh wait, is it the part where the baby took one breath and died? “Death on delivery.” That’s not governing it’s torture. #DemsUnited
1,381
5,881
25,498
1,277,043
Finally got around to tracking down a scan of Human Fly #11, which I owned as a kid, because if I just told you that an inker or letterer had sneaked the word "smegma" into a 1978 Marvel comic you'd accuse me of False Memory Syndrome.
1
1
257