Qubic's second halving is official. At Epoch 227 (~Aug 19), the burn rate climbs from 55% to 77.5%. Emissions stay fixed at 1T QUBIC/week, but net supply entering circulation drops from 450B to 225B. Cut in half. Bitcoin shrinks the faucet. Qubic widens the drain. Why it matters: it keeps supply from hitting the 200T cap too early, sharpens scarcity, and extends rewards for miners and Computors.

Qubic knows exactly what a 51% attack looks like. In 2025, Qubic took majority control of Monero’s hash rate and reorganized its ledger, a live experiment with crypto’s oldest threat. The economics are why it keeps happening. Overpowering Bitcoin would cost an attacker more than $6 billion. A smaller proof-of-work chain can go for as little as $50,000. That gap is why chains like Bitcoin Gold and Ethereum Classic have been hit. Qubic’s own chain was built to resist that attack long before its Monero experiment. The number that matters here is 66.7%, and it works in your favor. A change to Qubic’s ledger finalizes only when 451 of its 676 Computors agree. That’s a two-thirds supermajority, required every single time. So what happens when attackers show up? Say 226 Computors turn malicious. They still can’t rewrite a single balance. The most they can do is halt the network, and a frozen ledger keeps every balance exactly as it was. Gathering even 226 is the hard part. No single entity is allowed more than 225 Computor slots, which is hard-coded into the protocol, one slot below the number it would take to force a halt. Watching the whole time: Network Guardians, independent nodes embedded in the core network that monitor Computor behavior in real time. The design started from a blunt assumption: Some Computors could turn malicious. It earns its security by verifying every actor, every block. Qubic ran that experiment on someone else’s chain. Its own was built for 66.7%, turning the attacker’s math into a defense.

And it all happens in the open. Papers you can read. Datasets you can download. No faith is required. Which track are you most interested in? 👇 g-factor research → qubic.org/blog-detail/g-fact…

Right now, in a browser tab, tiny digital brains are being born, eating, mating, and dying, all while an algorithm hunts for the few smart enough to survive. This is Qubic’s actual AI research. Here’s where the science team is taking it next. 🧵

The Qubic development engine is accelerating in Epoch 217. 🛠️ Core protocol updates are shipping fast: critical fourq hotfixes merged, QBay SC patches deployed, and 5 active PRs expanding multi-dimensional revenue and the Qassandra AI foundation. With the WolfPack contract live and the 15.5M TPS bare-metal architecture setting the speed record over networks like Solana and ICP, the ecosystem focus remains firmly locked on uPoW execution and Aigarth's training methodology. Read the full dev and ecosystem brief 👇 pastebin.com/5m7LaTU1 qubic-network:native 👾

The majority of AI projects show you the winners, while quietly burying the failures. Qubic just published all of them. 34 runs. 5,936 architectures. 68,664 files. The biggest accomplishments alongside every dead end, uploaded raw to Hugging Face. It’s called the Neuraxon Game of Life: a world where tiny spiking brains live, eat, mate, and explore, while a search hunts for the one design that survives best. Every brain was scored on a single fitness number plus ten biology-based metrics. The champion (trial 191, fitness 9.40 on 24 neurons) sits alongside architectures that scored as low as 3.77 and died out. Even if you never touch crypto, this is why open data matters: • A researcher can test the method. • A skeptic can audit the claim. • A builder can take the best brain and push it further. The data is labeled honestly: raw research output, rough edges and all, under an open license. An actual lab notebook. What would you build with 5,936 evolving brains?

Two numbers decide Qubic’s supply. One just got cut in half by an on-chain vote. The other climbs every time the network gets used. The halving that just passed is a step toward the line where they cross. 🧵

Qubic Ecosystem Brief – June 13, 2026 Key highlights from today's data: - Epoch 217 at 48.2% progress (3d 15h remaining) - Price $0.0000004378 ( 2.41%), recovering 5.26% from June 11 ATL - Volume spike 15.7% to $1.24M - Triple mining: DOGE 14 blocks (best E214: 51, total 264), LTC 6 blocks (best E215: 27, total 88) - Guardian fleet: 117 nodes across 7 regions with diversity weighting active - Dev velocity: 4 commits today including fourq hotfix and hyperidentity threshold increase - All 7 ecosystem projects reporting growth metrics: Qearn at 18.86% supply locked, qMine at 903 holders, Qraffles burned 102M tokens pastebin.com/Q4zFZDnc qubic-network:native

A weekend look at the people actually building this thing, because the last "Tech on Deck" AMA got honest about it. Building Qubic is not normal software work. When your code is live on the network and it breaks, it does not just throw an error. It costs real money. 🧵

June 11 All-Hands was a big one. The short version: the listing board approved a fiat on-ramp and a crypto payment card covering 173 countries. CCF Proposal Underway. The scientific team got Neuraxon V2.0 paper accepted at AGI-26 in San Francisco. Core tech locked in four protocol milestones between now and August, including outsourced computing on mainnet and the next emission halving.

Learn how the burn works → qubic.org/blog-detail/qubic-…

On most chains, your transaction fee goes to someone. On Qubic, it goes to no one. It is destroyed. And the network is about to add another furnace. Every smart contract execution: fee burned. Every Oracle Machine call pulling outside data: burned. And now Outsourced Computation, contracts acting beyond the chain, works the same way. Each call costs a fee. Each fee is removed from the Qubic supply forever. Three burn mechanisms. Zero of them optional. All of them tied to real work. This is the part people miss about Qubic: Activity is not just traffic. Activity is subtraction. The ultimate goal: usage outburns emission, and the supply curve bends down. That date is not set by anyone. It's earned, one transaction at a time.

I confirm. Go to #Qubic discord and run Anna.exe published there, you will see that upon improvement of fitness function score of the training set (green column) you often get improvement of the validation set (yellow column). In a several weeks this architecture will be deployed to the #Qubic network as open source code and you'll become able to confirm it yourself.

$QUBIC and chill.

Qubic "All Hands" AMA x.com/i/broadcasts/1RKjppRkz…

Once a smart contract can send an instruction off-chain, a wall comes down. Qubic contracts have been stuck inside Qubic. Outsourced Computation lets them reach out. Here is what that actually opens up, in plain terms. 🧵

We have no unit of measurement for intelligence. Not for humans. Not for machines. We've been arguing about it for over a century. Up to 45% of the benchmarks we use to evaluate LLMs contain leaked training data. ARC-AGI-3 was built to fix that. Humans solve 100% of it. Frontier AI scores below 1%. NIA Volume 10 breaks down the g factor, Chollet's framework, benchmark contamination, and what measuring machine intelligence actually requires.

The Qubic Community All Hands is back tomorrow. Thursday, June 11 at 11:00 AM EDT | 3:00 PM UTC, live on X. Incubation, Marketing, Core-Tech, Science, and Business Development are all presenting. Five teams, one stream, questions answered live.

Qubic does not outsource compute. It outsources computation. One letter of difference. It changes everything, and it is the most misunderstood part of what launches July 29. No, Qubic is not renting out processing power. No, miners will not be running your LLM. Renting compute is: “Here is a pile of processing power. Do whatever you want with it.” That is not this. Outsourced Computation is narrow by design. A smart contract decides on one authorized action. “Move these funds.” “Trigger this on Ethereum.” One contract. One verified intent. Nothing more. And nothing leaves the chain until 451 of the 676 Computors independently sign it. The receiving system checks those signatures and knows the network actually approved the action. Not one server. Not a multisig of insiders. Two-thirds of the network, every single time. It is not a compute marketplace. It is a smart contract reaching out with one instruction the whole network agreed to.