TODAY'S GoyTalk: I understand why
@RealCandaceO says "Bolshevism became zionism." And while there's some truth to that, it would be better to say "many Bolshevik jews became zionist jews." Allow me to explain.
🔖BOOKMARK & SHARE THIS SUNDAY ESSAY 🔖
The reason why it's important to make that distinction is because the non-jewish component of these movements is not transforming from one into the other. Gentile communists haven't become zionists. To insinuate that launders jewish responsibility onto Gentiles.
Let's take a look.
The Democrat Party is the home of Bolshevism/Marxism/communism in the United States. And as of the latest polling, 80% of Democrats oppose israel, or look upon it unfavorably. Explicit support for the Palestinians amongst Democrats now outnumbers support for israel by 4-to-1.
However, amongst jewish Democrats, support for israel runs at around 85% in the latest polling. And around 80-85% of American jewry is, or recently was, Democrat. Indeed, American jewish females voted 88% for Kamala Harris in 2024.
This is creating a split in the Democrat Party between jews & Gentiles, similar to the split you're seeing on the Right between MAGA & America First. That is why you're now seeing jewish defection from the Democrat Party to MAGA, exemplified by people like Shabbos Kestenbaum and Batya Ungar-Sargon.
But this defection isn't new, and has actually happened before. The 20th Century saw the rise of the "Neoconservative" Republicans, or "Neocons." Who were they? They were liberal jewish Democrats "mugged by reality," as famously described by jewish Neocon founding father, Irving Kristol. One of those "realities" was that the old liberal coalition of the Left was fragmenting, and support for israel & jews was getting left behind.
The Neocons were mostly a group of jews who had descended from the revolutionary Leftist jewish movements of the late-19th/early-20th Century. Specifically, one of their most common "progenitors" was early jewish Bolshevik Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) who led the failed Bolshevik uprising against the Tsar in 1905-06, and then helped lead the successful Bolshevik revolution of 1917.
When Stalin's rise to power brought Trotsky's followers into ideological conflict with Stalinism, some Bolshevik Trotsky-ites left Russia and came to the United States, where they helped found & build the American Communist Party (CPUSA), and also the Big Labor/socialism-lite Democrat Party.
We need to take a small historical detour here. For thousands of years, jews have created a vast array of movements to organize themselves and advance jewish interests. One ancient example was the rivalry between the Pharisees and Sadduccees, and their mutual clashes with the Zealots during the jewish civil war of 66 AD (before Titus & the Roman legions put down the Great jewish Revolt).
Other movements have come and gone, while others have persisted: Yahwism, ba'alism, molechism, the rival kingdoms between the northern 10 tribes (israel) and the Southern kingdom (judah), the system of temple sacrifices & worship, rabbinic judaism, talmudism, Karaite judaism (rejected Talmud), kaballah, Sabbateanism, Frankism, Hasidism, orthodox judaism, Reform judaism, Bundism, etc. There are countless. We needn't list them all. You get the idea.
But whatever the movement, whatever the ideology, it's always been a competition or drive as to what's right for jews? What's the best way forward? What will advance the jew & their power as a people?
It's with this perspective that we return to the late 19th/early 20th Century and introduce two more recent jewish movements: Bolshevism & zionism. Again, jews were faced with what was the best way forward for the jewish people? Some jews were staunchly in the Bolshevism camp, others were in the zionism camp. Some had sympathies in both camps.
Within this milieu came Winston Churchill's famous essay "Zionism vs. Bolshevism, A Struggle For the Soul Of The jewish People." It's well exemplified by the the family of Chaim Weizmann—the first president of israel—amongst which were communists, zionists and bundists.
Bundism itself was a jewish labor movement that supported jewish autonomy, secularism, "yiddishism" and Marxism. It strongly opposed zionism at first, but several years after the successful establishment of israel, it came around and decided that maybe zionism and israel were an important contribution to the jewish people after all, and opened up offices in israel.
What I want you to see and understand is that this wasn't the first or only time conflicting jewish movements competed for the soul of the jewish people. Such struggles have been going on amongst them for literally thousands of years. And the other thing to understand is that many jews aren't rigidly or dogmatically faithful to only one movement for their entire lives. They tend to adapt, change & move around, and have sympathies that lie with various movements to one degree or another. Maybe you've heard the classic jewish saying, "2 jews, 3 opinions." The Talmud itself is built upon centuries worth of debates between jewish rabbis.
Because remember, the one overarching motivation behind all of them them is this: what is best for the jews? And that can change with changing circumstances and stages of life. So there have always been disagreements and competition amongst the jews about how to best look after jewish interests. But, there isn't disagreement that jewish interests is what they're all fighting for.
This motivation & neverending drive for tribal unity is why they have organizations like "The World jewish Congress," with its international legislative body for the jewish people—complete with candidates, representatives, slates of issues and voting. Many different jewish factions come together with their competing visions for the jewish people, and then vote to decide the best way forward. But they have many organizations and billionaire-funded think tanks dedicated to these purposes as well.
And that takes us back to these Trotsky-ite jews who eventually became the Neocons. Again, these Trotsky-ites came to America and helped build the modern Left, the Democrat Party and CPUSA. However, with the emergence of "Stalinist" communism, which they opposed—especially after the McCarthyism and the Red Scare of the 1950s—many jewish members of CPUSA left that party and joined their compatriots in the Democrat Party.
But that became problematic as well, because the Democrat Party also became infiltrated with Stalinist/Soviet sympathies, which at that time directly and stridently opposed israel, which it saw as an outpost of the West. This helped spawn the creation of something called the "New Left," which opposed israel & zionism, and therefore was at ideological odds with the old, liberal Leftist coalition that many jewish Democrats had been a part of.
Then, after the shock of the 6-Day War in which the Arab states had been backed by the Soviet Union, these Trotsky-ite jews decided that not only did the Democrat Party no longer best serve their interests, but it was also an existential threat to jews. So, some of them migrated to the Republican Party, which at that time was opposed to the Soviet Union and supportive of israel. They became the "New Conservatives" of the Republican Party—as opposed to the recently arisen "New Left" of the Democrat Party. The "Neoconservatives" shortened to "Neocons."
Another diversion is necessary at this point. An additional ideology also arose in order to resolve the Bolshevik/zionist tension: jewish-led "anti-zionism." This movement holds that the responsibility for zionism & israeli atrocities doesn't actually lie with jews, rather, it lies with White supremacy, European colonialism, Western imperialism, and Christian zionism. This allows Leftist/Democrat/Bolshevik jews to continue to coexist in (relative) harmony with their zionist jewish coethnics, by creating an abstract non-jewish boogeyman to blame. It's also helpful in conquering the goyim by getting the goyim to blame entities other than the one responsible—namely, jewish supremacy.
Anti-zionism allows Leftist Democrat jews to remain ideologically aligned with the larger Democrat Party, which is also largely anti-White, anti-Christian, and anti-Western. It also allows jews to continue advancing their interests by providing ideological cover for zionist jews to operate under cover while Gentiles take the blame.
But regarding the former topic, this is how turn-of-the-century Trotsky-ite Bolsheviks eventually became "neoconservative" Republicans, which currently dominate and form the basis of pro-israel MAGA.
(This is why the current jewish-wing of MAGA refers to antisemites on the Right as "woke." Their dividing line between Right/Left, Conservative/Liberal, and Republican/Democrat is support for israel, which it purposely shoehorns into "The West." If you don't support israel, then you must be a liberal, Leftist woke Democrat, who opposes israel.)
Here's the lesson: jews are whatever they need to be in order to advance the interests of the jewish people. And one of the major objectives of the jewish people is something called "Tikkun Olam," which literally means "to repair the world." That's like their mission statement. What it means in practice, though, is "to make the world jewish," or even more to the point "to subdue the world under jewish rule." It's about jewish supremacy and it always has been.
The mission of the jewish people is to advance jewish supremacy and establish world rule under the global jewish nation, of which israel is seen by most jews as an important part.
The purpose of these movements and ideologies that jews create and/or lead is to organize their jewish supremacy—which goes hand in hand with waging war on us, the "goyim." Organizing themselves and waging war on us are two sides of the same coin: establishing jewish supremacy. Sometimes the tension between sides is real and vicious (like in the jewish civil war of 66 AD), and sometimes it's just performative for Gentiles (like in the case of Noam Chomsky, who was best buddies with Jeffrey Epstein while also promoting anti-zionism).
For many jews of yesteryear, seeking the best interests of jews meant embracing & promoting Bolshevism. For many today, it means zionism. Some jews, like zionist Batya Ungar-Sargon (who describes herself as "MAGA Left/Marxist Right"), move effortlessly between the two.
jews are whatever they need to be in order to organize themselves and conquer the Gentiles. On the other hand, we Gentiles do NOT tend to move fluidly between Bolshevism and zionism like the jews do. That is why the modern Democrat Party is 80% opposed to israel. It has been ideologically aligned with communism & anti-zionism for decades, and it's not budging. While jewish Democrats move ever closer to israel, their fellow Gentile Democrats resist and pull away from israel.
And that is the problem with the generalized statement: "Bolshevism became zionism." It wraps Gentiles up into a dynamic that is uniquely jewish, and in doing so it deflects accountability and blame away from those responsible: jews.
Gentile Bolsheviks didn't become zionists. jewish ones did. Bolshevism and zionism aren't twin millstones created & controlled by Gentiles to grind down the Gentiles and subdue the world. They're for jews to do that to us.
We might just as well re-title Churchill's famous essay: "Bolshevism vs. zionism, A Struggle For The Best Way For jewish Supremacy To Enslave The Goyim."
This is the context you lose by simply saying "Bolshevism became zionism." No, jewish zionists embrace Bolshevism and use Bolshevik tactics—and vice versa—as they see necessary for the advancement of their interests and their supremacy over us.
EXHIBITS:
▪️Top Left: jewish support for israel
▪️Top Right: overall support for israel
▪️Bottom Left: relative support for Palestine vs. Israel amongst Democrats
▪️Bottom Right: jewish supremacy dialectic for reconciling opposing jewish factions, for pitting Gentiles against each other, and for deflecting blame away from jewish supremacy