Maa saved Hindus of West Bengal.

IMPORTANT: Dear Mr @N_RamchanderRao do read section 33 A of the Rep of People Act. Section 33A deals with disclosure of criminal antecedents by a candidate. Broadly, a candidate is required to disclose information where he or she is accused of an offence punishable with imprisonment of two years or more and where charges have been framed by a competent court, or where the candidate has been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment of one year or more. None of these conditions exist in the Meenakshi Natarajan case. In fact, Hyderabad court refused to take cognisance of the case today, albeit on procedural grounds but there is no prima facie case made out against Ms Natarajan either in this private complaint . Far from it in fact with no FIR also filed naming her. As for the returning officer, he is not expected to act in a mechanical manner. Please read para 6 (6): Para 6(6) says there is a presumption that every nomination paper is valid unless the contrary is prima facie obvious or has been made out. In case of a reasonable doubt as to the validity of a nomination paper, the benefit of such doubt must go to the candidate concerned. Please also read Para 10(12) that says that where the prescribed affidavit has not been filled at all, or where the affidavit has been filed but is found or considered defective or containing false information, the nomination should not be rejected on that ground alone. Clearly this means that the candidate must be given a fair chance to explain if at all any defect is found. Net net: it is apparent that the case was decided in an arbitary manner and justice should be done to avoid such rulings that diminish public faith in the election process. I am sorry to turn to my original profession of a lawyer here with this lengthy response . I have no skin in this political game , have never even met Ms Natarajan but will speak out when there is a blatant miscarriage of justice . I sure hope the day doesn’t come when a nomination is rejected for a non disclosure of a parking offence next. Indian democracy deserves better 🙏

Going few years back from my yesterday’s post of 1950 Hindu g*noc|de, do read the victim accounts of conversions, r@pes, and killings in 1946 (in the two given images). These are Hindu witness- victim accounts, re-telling the horrors they went through during Direct Action Day and Noakhali riots in 1946. The book that had documented the witnesses speaking of their horrific experiences, is ‘1946: The Great Calcutta Killings and Noakhali Genocide.’ It is available on archive.org as pdf. Bengali Hindu g*noc|de needs to be revisited, as it was whitewashed and quietly buried by the Communists and Islamists working hand in hand, as they kept fooling people with the line ‘ek brinte duti kusum’ (two flowers in one branch).

Aa gaye, Ram yaad aa gaye inko! Sanjay Raut says he with Uddhav Thackeray will go to Ayodhya to APOLOGIZE to Prabhu Shri Ram. After losing party, symbol, money purse (BMC) & now 7/9 LS MPs for backstabbing Hindutva...JANAB Uddhav to 'become' Hindu again.

IMPORTANT: SC dismisses Meenakshi Natarajan plea on rejection of her RS nomination, says she must file election petition in HC. A petition like this will take minimum 2-3 years , followed by appeal by which the RS term will be over!@ECISVEEP will take hands-off approach saying matter is sub judice! Net net: a returning officer can act in a prima facie arbitrary manner to disqualify a candidate with no immediate legal remedy. What a ‘masterstroke’!🙏

IMPORTANT: SC dismisses Meenakshi Natarajan plea on rejection of her RS nomination, says she must file election petition in HC. A petition like this will take minimum 2-3 years , followed by appeal by which the RS term will be over!@ECISVEEP will take hands-off approach saying matter is sub judice! Net net: a returning officer can act in a prima facie arbitrary manner to disqualify a candidate with no immediate legal remedy. What a ‘masterstroke’!🙏

Hyderabad, Telangana: “Very sad thing, she would have been in a safe place if she had mentioned pending court case against her.” - Sexual assault Complainant in the case linked to Congress RS candidate Meenakshi Natarajan

This is in no way punishment for crimes, it must be law that prevails, not this medieval public shaming. If it’s being done for public catharsis and stopping them from committing retributive acts then okay. But speedy justice is needed.

10 years back on June 11 2016 I was elected to Rajya Sabha with the highest vote tally of 62 ; when INC own MLA strength was 53. BJP fielded a 3 rd candidate ; who lost the election decisively !! 1 of the finest moments of ⁦@INCIndia⁩. ⁦@OfficeOfKNath⁩ #RajyaSabha