I often think of the stupid and harmful psyops I have seen over my decade since I was a child.
The first one I remember was in elementary school when they would repeat as a mantra that violence is never the answer. Not that there might be exceptional circumstances. Not that sometimes it has a place, but that it never, ever is appropriate.
As any boy growing up in lower and middle-class america, swords, ninjas, vikings, knights, and modern soldiery was of interest to me. Me and others would often ask, well then why does the government do war stuff?
Teachers never could give an answer, but they would always gently scold that individuals are not the government.
It turns out that violence is very often the answer. Not the uncontrolled viciousness of an abusive woman, per se. But surgical application.
And it turns out the only ones benefited by the average man or woman being unwilling to react violently no matter what are psychosexual predators, con artists, and animals wearing human skin.
The most modern false psyop I see is that any reaction towards someone else with cruelty is a psychopathological justification for sadism. It's a wrongness, you see? You must react with deep civility and deference to the human rights and any dignity of all people no matter what.
Except that's bullshit.
That's a wormtongue doctrine that has only benefited bio-leninists who have weaponized cluster B traits in subverting normal life.
The rewards of tolerance, it turns out, are treachery and betrayal.
Anytime people take a moral grandstand to demand you simply take it, anon, force yourself to consider, "To whose benefit?"
We don't have license to be violent against everyone at any time. But there is no moral restriction against a woman gunning down a rapist, or a man strangling a home invader.
We don't have license to wreck just anyone anywhere. But there must be no tolerance for disingenuous fools and troublemakers.
Use your discernment, anon. And broker no bullshit.