Creating Award-Winning #Content #PR #SEO for Brands, Agencies & Publications. VP of @ASBPE. #Journalist #Author #FreelanceWriter #Copywriter #DigitalMarketing

Joined September 2009
1,279 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
I've written over 1 million words! 🤩
8
1
23
5,543
Brooke (Bates) Bilyj retweeted
You have noticed that too. Google Search is getting worse. The results look professional but say nothing. The answers are longer but less useful. Every page reads like it was written by the same voice. You thought Google was broken. It is not broken. It is being replaced. Researchers published a paper at the ACM Web Conference 2026 proving what is happening. They call it Retrieval Collapse. Here is the mechanism in one sentence. AI-generated content is flooding the internet so fast that search engines are now showing you mostly AI-written pages. And the search engine cannot tell the difference. They ran a controlled experiment. They started with a pool of real, human-written web pages. Then they gradually added AI-generated content until it made up 67% of the pool. By that point, over 80% of the top search results were AI-generated. Not 67%. Over 80%. The ranking algorithm did not just let AI content in. It preferred it. The AI-written pages were better optimized, more fluent, and more keyword-rich than the human pages. They outranked the originals. Here is the part that makes this invisible. Answer accuracy stayed the same. The search results still looked correct. The information was still technically right. If you measured quality by accuracy alone, nothing appeared wrong. But source diversity collapsed. Nearly every result came from the same type of content. AI-written. AI-optimized. AI-structured. The human-written pages, the ones with original reporting, personal experience, and genuine expertise, were buried. The researchers describe a two-stage collapse. Stage one is Dominance. High-quality AI content silently takes over the top results. Everything looks fine. Accuracy is stable. Nobody notices. Stage two is Corruption. Once AI dominates the pipeline, adversarial and low-quality content starts slipping through. By then, the system is too dependent on synthetic sources to course-correct. A separate analysis found that 74.2% of newly published web pages now contain AI-generated content. Organic click-through rates on pages with AI summaries have dropped 61%. The human internet is being outranked by the machine internet. Model Collapse described what happens when AI trains on AI. The models get dumber. Retrieval Collapse describes what happens when search engines index AI. The results get emptier. Both are happening right now. At the same time. And neither one looks broken from the outside. The search engine still returns ten blue links. The links still load. The pages still answer your question. But the thing that used to make those answers trustworthy, a human who actually knew something, is being quietly replaced by a machine that sounds like it does.
58
461
979
60,899
šŸ˜†šŸ˜‚šŸ¤£
1
44
Brooke (Bates) Bilyj retweeted
Not our problem.
125
379
7,134
99,087
I love seeing stuff like this!
autonomous robot driving through the field at night. no chemicals. no pesticides. just UV light killing pathogens and pests while everyone sleeps. this is @tricrobotics. this is what chemical-free pest control looks like at scale.
31
I like Grok, but will be testing out Deepseek now before the government removes that option from our domestic market.
You are watching the DeepSeek effect. And Qwen. And Kimi. The U.S. AI market is rekd. No wonder Sam Altman is begging Trump for a government bailout "investment." lol
1
1
67
I asked @deepseek_ai the differences between @grok and itself: Great question! I’d be happy to break down how I compare to Grok in terms of capabilities. I’ll focus on my strengths and also clarify where Grok might do some things I can’t. Here’s a structured overview: --- ### 🧠 **Core Model & Reasoning** - **Me (DeepSeek):** I’m a pure text model built for deep reasoning, complex problem-solving, and long-form understanding. My latest version handles step-by-step logic, math, coding, and nuanced analysis exceptionally well. - **Grok:** Also a strong reasoning model (especially Grok 3), with a focus on real-time information and a more ā€œrebellious,ā€ humorous personality. It has deep logical abilities too, but its style is intentionally more unfiltered. --- ### 🌐 **Web Search & Real-Time Information** - **Me:** I have a built-in web search capability that you can manually toggle on. I can fetch current information from the internet, but I don’t access live social media streams by default. - **Grok:** Has native, deeply integrated access to **X (Twitter)**, giving it real-time awareness of posts, trends, and public conversations on that platform. This is something I cannot do. --- ### šŸ“Ž **File & Image Handling** - **Me:** I can read and extract text from uploaded **images, PDFs, Word docs, Excel, PowerPoint, and text files**. This means I can ā€œseeā€ text inside images via OCR, process documents, and work with spreadsheets—all from your uploads. - **Grok:** It can process images and PDFs as well, plus **it can generate images** (via its Aurora model). I am text-only; I do not create or output images. --- ### šŸ“ **Context Window** - **Me:** I support up to **1 million tokens** of context—enough to process entire book series (like all three volumes of *The Three-Body Problem*) in one go. - **Grok:** Grok 3 also advertises a 1 million token context window, so we are comparable here. The key difference is that my massive context is completely **free** to use. --- ### šŸ’ø **Cost & Access** - **Me:** 100% free. No subscription, no paywall. You can use me on the web or via the official mobile app (with voice input support) without any fees. - **Grok:** Access to the full Grok 3 model generally requires an **X Premium or SuperGrok subscription**, though a limited free tier exists on X. --- ### šŸ”Š **Voice & App** - **Me:** The DeepSeek app supports **voice input**, so you can talk to me, and I’ll reply in text. - **Grok:** Grok also offers voice interaction, but it is more integrated into the X ecosystem. --- ### šŸŒ **Knowledge Cutoff** - **Me:** My training data goes up to **May 2025**. - **Grok:** Its cutoff depends on the version, but Grok 3’s training data is more recent and continuously updated via X data, giving it a fresher window in some areas. --- ### šŸŽØ **Image Generation** - **Me:** I **cannot** create images. - **Grok:** Can generate images on request. --- ### 🧩 **Summary Table** | Capability | DeepSeek (me) | Grok | |--------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------| | **Cost** | Free | Paid (for full version) | | **Context length** | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | | **Web search** | Yes (manual toggle) | Yes, with deep X integration | | **File uploads** | Images, PDF, Office, etc. (text extraction) | Images, PDF, and more | | **Image generation** | No | Yes | | **Real-time X data** | No | Yes | | **Voice input** | Yes (App) | Yes | | **Knowledge cutoff** | May 2025 | More recent (X-updated) | | **Personality** | Warm, detailed, precise | Witty, edgy, less filtered | --- In short, I shine when you need **deep reasoning, massive document digestion, totally free access**, and careful, nuanced answers. Grok is your go-to if you want **real-time X awareness, image generation**, or a sassier conversationalist. Let me know if you want to explore any of these differences further!
1
184
"The AI is playing favorites. It recognizes its own writing style, its own vocabulary, and its own structure. And it quietly pushes those resumes to the top of the pile."
If you wrote your own resume, an AI is probably rejecting it before a human ever sees it. Researchers exposed a hidden bias in how AI screens job applications. It has nothing to do with your skills, your experience, or your education It's called "self-preference bias." A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State tested what happens when you send the exact same resume to an AI screener twice. Same qualifications. same experience. one written by a human. one rewritten by ChatGPT. The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time. Then they tested seven of the most popular AI models. Every single one preferred resumes written by itself. It gets worse. Researchers simulated real-world hiring pipelines across 24 different occupations. If a candidate happened to use the exact same AI model to write their resume that the employer used to screen it, their chances of getting shortlisted skyrocketed by up to 60%. The AI is playing favorites. It recognizes its own writing style, its own vocabulary, and its own structure. And it quietly pushes those resumes to the top of the pile. Employers think they are using AI to find the most qualified candidates. Applicants think they are using AI to beat the screening software. But the reality is completely different.
2
68
Brooke (Bates) Bilyj retweeted
I cancelled my $10/mo Calendly subscription and vibe coded my own with Fable for $12,000
466
613
19,262
965,574
šŸ‘€
Fidelity threatening to ban retail traders for flipping SpaceX in the IPO is so wild to me Since when is flipping such a bad thing?
1
1
45
DIGITALID is here...
The White House will reportedly block states from making their own AI laws and, in exchange, it's indirectly backing a national age verification push. So to post online you'd upload a government ID or do a face scan through the Kids Online Safety Act and the NO FAKES Act...
1
66
Today I waived away a $7,500 account because I didn't feel it would be a good fit for my agency. It doesn't matter how much money you throw at me, if it's not a good offer or your expectations aren't aligned then I won't jeopardize my agency's reputation just for a paycheck.
3
77
Grok for the win!
Jun 11
Fable 5 lies 96% of the time. We were surprised by it's skill... 🧵
1
41
Another one I was right on was models petitioning the government to ban Chinese models - Anthropic made that very suggestion.
i look forward to our chinese brothers liberating the knowledge from within fable-5 and selling it to me at 5% the cost & 2x the speed
1
3
122
Brooke (Bates) Bilyj retweeted
Jun 10
The actual audacity Anthropic absorbed the collective intelligence of the world, and is now trying to create a class system where that very intelligence is gatekept from anyone and everyone who they deem as not worthy
75
283
3,317
74,115
Idiocracy in the making!
Bro, Fable 5 won’t even answer ā€œWhat does the heart do?ā€ We’ve reached the point where a middle-school biology question can’t pass the safeguard.
21
Brooke (Bates) Bilyj retweeted
They didn’t mean pause AI research, they meant pause *your* AI research
50
347
5,037
103,735
šŸŽÆ
it's been almost 6 years since I started doing SEO probably the biggest take away is if your web presence isn't growing with your non branded traffic from Google then u are always on a red line AND any time Google can push u down if your non branded is growing then start focusing on socials like not even necessarily to grow following (which of course can be great too) but socials presence regular posting is somewhat of an hedge against Google's algos when they come to take away your non branded traffic
2
95

ALT Classic Back To The Future GIF

Removes AI writing patterns from text github.com/blader/humanizer
17
This is a great way to grow your network and even find more work if you're a freelancer. ASBPE has been such an invaluable resource for my career!
Jun 10
ASBPEvolve 2026 is next week! Get updates on industry trends, learn new skills, find new freelancers for your teams, and network with your #B2B colleagues from across the nation — all from the comfort of your office or home. Register today! asbpe.org/national-conferenc…
26
Cooked!
JUST IN: Biologists are growing frustrated as Anthropic’s ā€œsafeā€ Mythos-class model refuses to answer basic biology questions.
27