Imagine two different types of universe.
In the first, all things feel like something, and this is why they move. When organisms move the "wrong" way, they starve or are eaten, move the "right" way they have offspring and survive.
Over generations, evolution finds more complex ways of moving that survive. These movements are caused by more complex feelings - a stronger sense of smell and touch, of hunger, or being able to see clearer shapes and so on.
This is how minds can evolve in a universe that's fundamentally made of sensation-driven choice. In that sort of universe, when control organs like brains evolve, they naturally evolve to have minds. In that sort of universe, the "laws of physics" are just observations of what matter feels like doing on average, under certain situations - they aren't commandments by the creator.
Now let's imagine a second universe - one where things strictly follow rules made by a creator.
In this one, actions are caused by rules - feelings have no effect. Brains evolve without a reason to feel anything at all. Having no way to align "how it feels" with "what it does", this universe does not have a biological selection pressure to build the likes of human consciousness.
Software exists in the second type of universe - a rule-following system. People believe that we do too, but because we have consciousness they're provably wrong; if we lived in a rule-following system we'd have no reason to have minds.
So believing in software consciousness is, IMO, evolution denial with extra steps.
bitplane.net/~/doc/thoughts/…