FORESKINMAXXING IS NOW POSSIBLE!! According to the top cock connoissuer, Will blunderfield claims that we are being controlled through the removal of our foreskin and that there are ways to rejuvenate the removed foreskin "If they can make us hate our cocks then they can control us"

The average Intactivist man who is genitally mutilated and suffers regularly from intense trauma could never even come close to matching the fiercely combative, lion like nature of a western Intact women speaking out against FGM. It's like comparing a timid teacup yorkie to a seasoned grey wolf. Western men are the dumb, self imposed whipping boy gender. They excel in being timid goofs that lose at everything and have less rights. Less are enrolled in college, less are employed, genitally mutilated en masse, legal system is infinitely more harsh on them. Just the L gender. And in the West, they accept being framed as the "privileged" sex when the exact opposite is true and cartoonishly so. What a fuckin sad, sick joke.

If you hired someone today to restrain your parents, intrude into their genitals, and amputate their sexual anatomy because you thought it would be “cleaner”, would you expect them to forgive you or not press criminal charges?

Men who are existing victims of genital mutilation should have a comprehensive legal framework to pursue criminal felony sexual battery charges against their parents and the doctors, nurses, and mohels involved in amputating their foreskins as juveniles. If you think differently, you should be prepared to die for that belief. It is that serious and men will get justice for the atrocity of infant foreskin amputation. Anyone who would stand in the way of that is a ghoul.

'Children's rights don't begin after the scalpel. They begin before it.' @DrHoenderkamp on reports the Green Party is considering a policy on banning circumcision.

How anyone can make the case for circumcision of healthy infants is baffling to me. As a vulnerable baby boy born in the UK, I simply cannot believe that the state didn’t protect me from my own parents. Time and again, the government wince and turn the other way.

It's interesting to watch how the Brits respond to their green party raising the issue of criminalizing infant circ. What's bizarre is how many of them shield and defend this practice. Tons of intact men and women who'd never want this happening to them just pile on to defend mutilating children and then hurl out some excuse about how it can be framed as a "healthy medical choice" so it's fine. The victims of this practice are going to have to fight tooth and nail to get justice. A lot of people just outright hate you if you identify as a victim of this. People have a vested interest in making sure you are diminished and pushed aside so the status quo is upheld.

I wouldn't care if there was a 100% risk reduction in penile cancer, I wouldn't have wanted 1cm of my foreskin amputated. The foreskin is a core, foundational dimension of male sexual anatomy and shouldn't be amputated for theoretical future disease risk reduction.

The foreskin is the most erogenous and functional tissue on the male penis and it's often presented as a disease ridden joke of anatomy that can be violently amputated from an infant on a whim. That is how sick and rotten our society is. It's the pinnacle of wickedness.

The foreskin should be seen in a similar light as the clitoris or the glans. It's a critical dimension of male anatomy, and it's amputation results in a diminishment of function and sensation, and depending on how much of the foreskin/frenulum is taken, the sensory loss can often be profoundly severe and near nullification. It is more nuanced than this, but I see the inside layer of the foreskin as a sort of direct continuation or extension of the glans surface area in many ways. Clinical medicine should be doing everything it can to preserve this dimension of male sexual anatomy and avoiding anything that would damage it or result in it's amputation unless it was absolutely necessary. If for some reason it had to be amputated, a doctor should present foreskin restoration or some type of regenerative solution as a logical next step that a patient can take.

They DEFILE the sexual organ of a child!

We should give more consideration to framing routine/ritual infant foreskin amputation as felony sexual battery that can be charged under existing legislation

Every single day I mourn the sexual loss I experience from being subjected to the atrocity of infant foreskin amputation. Every sexual experience I have is tainted and radically diminished and it's so in my face and palpable. I mourn the person I could have been if I hadn't been subjected to extreme genital torture that permanently changed my psychology and neurological anatomy. For my entire life, my nervous system has been in a constant state of fight or flight. I'm not sure I've ever really experienced a peaceful, at ease state except with the use of drugs. I can't ever move on from this because of how deeply imprinted it is in my physical body. I feel like this mutilation defines me.

Holistic Certified Physicians Assistant shares message about a "better way" to amputate the foreskin of an infant boy