This tweet is entirely genre fiction, written by an unreliable narrator who hadn't the time to edit properly: The Shakespeare folio and the king James Bible were part of the same liberal project to collect the world's wisdom and release it to the public. The folio was a release of the British state archive and tranche of collected information regarding statecraft, politics, sociology, anthropology, familial relations, everything. Many many parties were involved. Many of the people suspected of being Shakespeare knew about the project and contributed. Shakespeare was a holding company, a living, breathing anon account, a puppet. The genre of dialogue was well known for its dialectic. Each play was modeled to cover all sides of an idea, which was popularized by Aquinas 300 years earlier in summa theological (the sum of all knowledge of God) using the argument and counter argument structure of a b c d e Ffx e' d' c' b' a'. But this style was used in the Bible often and called a chiasmus. The Bible also had statecraft information in it too in an encrypted form, some lost by scribes who didn't know they were there. The plays were encrypted. The earlier Greek plays were statecraft as well. They had to encrypt statecraft info so as not to help rival claimant states. This information alleviates us of a certain embarrassment: noting that "Shakespeare" is underrated to the point that rating him properly becomes crass. He seems godlike as one man but he's the collected secular wisdom of the state of Britain, a state analogue to the KJV which was commissioned by the same people. Many of the plays were not staged at all. The paper trail of their actual existence is actually pretty sparse considering they had the full backing of the state. There's far far more in the plays than has been discovered due to misclassifying the genre form and a severe governor on what they could mean if written by one man.