fable was very good at webslop can i have my shareholder value delivering model back please purely for shareholder value generation definitely not going to generate tons of traces to finetune qwen and gemma on for cybersec... wouldn't even think of such a thing

Fable being the enriched uranium of LLMs is a pretty good definition

and so the underground token blackmarkets also grow exponentially in the singularity interesting

uh oh

what did you do this time pliny

Fable 5 is what GPT 5 should've been

truest it has ever been

what the fuck has my lingo become 24 hours with Fable

yeah i think this seems fair, we're probably going to get a quota/limits bump aswell as a price reduction to GPT-5.6 api cost (like o3, but not so steep) being modest though, we're likely going to get 1/3rd the api cost slashed and a 50% bump up in codex limits if i had to guess

we are so back

you must rent h100s and you MUST experiment anon there is no other way out of the permanent underclass (i'm having Fable write training scripts and praying to claude it doesn't sabotage me)

anthropic is quoting a deleted tweet by dario what is going on with this entire company x.com/AnthropicAI/status/206…

"Accidental zz irrelevant." -GPT-5.5 CoT

i cannot imagine morale at OpenAI right now, this is like an unspoken Code Blood Red and i really doubt GPT-5.6 is going to be something to write home about time as always, will tell

yeah dev work is essentially gone, i fear the "June 22" Fable go away day is a sham and Anthropic is trying to delay the mass shift we're about to see in software engineering as a whole so they can capitalize off of it more Fable is amazing at dev work, it beats GPT-5.5 handily

this is my personal singularity moment this post may sound like a paid ad. I only wish. I'm concerned, more so than happy. the world is changing, and, among the scenarios where AI goes terribly wrong, inequality is the most realistic, yet, the one Anthropic seems to be the least concerned about. I'm glad OpenAI is taking the opposite stance: *personal AGI for everyone*. I think this is a commendable position in the times we live. but who am I in the queue of the bread? anyway, Fable is here, so I'll just report my first-hour experience first of all, all my pet prompts are solved. → λ-calculus puzzles → bug questions → one-shot apps all are trivial to it. I don't have anything harder other than my ongoing work so, in the last several days, I've been toying with HVM5, a new interaction net evaluator with a faster loop. after writing the first version, I left 32 GPT-5 agents working for ~20 hours each. this resulted in up to 2x speedups, but the file size increased by 2-fold and quality decreased significantly. I then simplified the whole thing into an even simpler core, and left Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 optimizing it for 8 hours. Opus got a legit 6% - 34% speedup in most benches. GPT got better results, but, sadly, an unusable file. I then asked Fable to optimize it. 2 hours later, it landed a 1770% speedup in one case, 100% in other 4, and 22% in average. yes, in 2 hours it outperformed me, opus 4.8 and a swarm of gpt 5.5 agents, by one order of magnitude. that could not possibly be legit. "it must be hardcoding the benchmarks" (GPT trauma). so I read its explanation and what it did was, indeed, the most high impact optimization one could try first. seems like HVM5 was wasting a lot of time garbage-collecting unused branches of pattern-match nodes. I had optimized that for static mats, but not for dynamic mats. skill issue. Fable figured how to do it for these, resulting in a massive speedup in some benches but wait, is that *correct*? I'm not sure yet, it is credible, but this is the kind of thing that is very easy to get wrong on interaction nets. the problem is, when I was ready to start auditing Fable's solution so I could tell whether it was buggy or legit, it interrupted me to tell me it had found a massive bug on the code *I* had written. ... wait, what? so... for garbage collection purposes, I stored a bit on lambda term pointers that meant "the variable bound by this lambda has been freed, so, its lambda must free whatever argument it is applied to". that's fine. yet, on duplicator nodes, I also used the same bit to mean "one of the duplicated variables was freed, so, treat this dup as a passthrough no-op". so, if a lambda entered a duplicator, it would mistake the lambda's collection bit for its own, resulting in corrupted interaction! that's a mouthful, why I'm writing this? just so you can appreciate the sheer absurdity of what just happened. I didn't ask it to find bugs. I asked it for an optimization. and even if I did ask it to find bugs, this bug is so astonishingly subtle and specific, identifying it takes mastering the domain to an extent that it beyond even me. I'd easily need hours or days to fix it, *if* I ever came across it. chances are it would just go unnoticed. and Fable found it and fixed it like it was nothing, while it was busy adding a 17x speedup to a file that neither I, nor Opus 4.8, nor a fleet of GPT 5.5 managed to barely make 2x faster. oh and there is also another tab where it is also ripping through Bend's codebase and finishing everything I had to do I don't know what to say anymore this isn't about Anthropic or OpenAI, this is about our collective future as a species. the world is changing, and we need to be aware of it, and discuss how to handle this change. receipt below . . .

none of this would've been possible without the GPU deal from SpaceXAI btw

confirmed, Claude Fable 5 will no longer be included in your subscription plans after June 22, but they may extend the window. (I presume they will)