I have just been arrested by the police in Madrid, Spain. My phone and passport have been seized but I had a second phone in my pocket so I’m writing this from the back of the police car. I was at Puerta del Sol for just 5 minutes. Police told me I cannot have conversations in the public square. I researched the law and spoke with a lawyer and.they are wrong.

So so so so glad I listened to this. 💕

Did not expect this from Akon!

Congratulations. You managed to build an entire conspiracy theory from a facial expression while simultaneously misspelling the name of the person you were using as evidence. My name is James Kaddis. Not “Kaddish.” Ordinarily, that would not matter much. But in this case, it matters because you were not even primarily attacking me. You were trying to use me as a prop to attack Erika. You built an entire narrative around what you imagined I was thinking and feeling, then presented your imagination as evidence. That is a level of confidence completely detached from competence. You also claimed I was sitting right next to her. Wrong again. I was sitting in my own studio, in an entirely different location. So let’s review. Wrong name. Wrong location. Wrong conclusion. Yet somehow we are supposed to trust your interpretation of my internal thoughts, emotions, and motives. You could not correctly identify who I was or where I was, but you apparently believe you can identify what was happening inside my head. That is not analysis. That is imagination pretending to be insight. The truth is simple: you have no idea what I was thinking, no idea what I was feeling, and no idea what was happening off camera. Yet you presented your speculation as fact because facts were apparently less useful to your narrative than imagination. I was not annoyed with Erika. I was not frustrated with Erika. I was not sitting there thinking, “Here we go again.” The truth is exactly the opposite. I was emotional because I care deeply about my friend. A widow. A woman whose husband was murdered while faithfully serving his nation. A man whose courage, sacrifice, and leadership changed lives across this country. And a woman who stood faithfully beside him, carried burdens most people will never understand, and had far more to do with that impact than shallow critics will ever comprehend. What makes your post especially revealing is that instead of showing compassion toward a widow carrying that kind of pain, you turned her grief into content. You needed a villain for your story, so you invented one. You needed evidence, so you invented that too. And somehow a completely fabricated interpretation of my facial expression became part of the script. You turned the pain of a widow into content, invented motives for people you have never met, and called it analysis. That is not exposing anyone. It is exposing yourself. Because when someone gets the observable facts wrong while remaining completely certain about the unobservable facts, that is usually a sign they are not pursuing truth. They are protecting a narrative. One final piece of advice. I noticed your request for help regarding people supposedly trying to shut down your channel. Respectfully, I think you’re looking in the wrong direction. Your greatest threat is not the people criticizing you. Your greatest threat is the habit of presenting fiction as fact. When a person gets the name wrong, the location wrong, the circumstances wrong, and then confidently claims to know the thoughts and motives of complete strangers, the problem is not opposition. The problem is credibility. And no critic can damage credibility nearly as effectively as the person destroying it himself. If your channel is struggling, I would spend less time worrying about enemies and more time worrying about accuracy. You managed to misspell the witness, misidentify the location, invent the testimony, and then present the whole thing as evidence. That is not journalism. That is not discernment. That is fan fiction with a confidence problem. The irony is that the only conspiracy here is the one you created between your keyboard and your imagination.

History's first trillionaire is a guy who catches rockets out of the sky with chopsticks and beams internet to every dead zone on the planet. Same guy ships cars that drive themselves, humanoid robots for the factory floor, brain chips that let paralyzed people move a cursor with pure thought, and an AI running on a supercomputer his team stood up in months instead of years. And the people crashing out about his net worth are doing it on the app he owns. The same app governments spent years trying to censor. You cannot legislate a rocket into orbit.

Just perfect. 😍

Europe is in TROUBLE & we could be next!

That Tucker is a Baaaad Hombre.

Thank you Tulsi for exposing their lies! It’s moments like this that should serve as a reminder why we worked so hard to win in 2024.

🚨 Dan Bongino blows up Tucker Carlson's credibility & claim that "Trump covered up the Butler Shooting" Bongino brought the receipts too, something Tucker Carlson did not do. Intentionally. The whole 12 minutes is worth watching 🔥

The greatest thing I have seen all week.

Glenn Beck is back! Watch our interview SATURDAY at 1PM EST!

How is this woman the CEO of ANYTHING?!

DO WE HAVE A FREAKING DEAL OR NOT? Another Platner accuser, and more black fatigue x.com/i/broadcasts/1yGBeeDnM…

More receipts incoming on my show today that the nepo baby is lying again. He’s like Teddy Ruxpin, you put a coin in his back and he tells you a story.

Chicago Police have released photos of a suspect in the cross burning incident at Grant Park that blacks and leftists have been blaming on white supremacists.

Yes, yes, other than having the symbol of the Nazi SS concentration camp guards over his heart for 18 years, there's no evidence that Graham Platner is or was a Nazi. He just coincidentally thinks Susan Collins and John Fetterman are controlled by AIPAC, that Israel causes the problems in the Middle East, that billionaires he doesn't like should be sent to prison, and he wants to put Americans on trains.

It was actually very widely reported at the time that President Trump called Charlie in July at SAS 2025. We had gone pretty hard on the Epstein topic at the conference, urging full transparency and release of all Epstein related files. (I've pulled a few screengrabs of the reporting but there's a ton). There were actually two calls that happened during SAS. President Trump was pretty upset in the first call, this is true. He thought too many of his supporters (and many of our speakers) were buying into a Democrat tactic to use Epstein against conservatives (which he was also saying publicly). That first call was a pretty short one. But then, there was a second call, I believe around 30 or 60 minutes after the first. I asked CK how it went, and he said to me "We're all good" meaning he and the president. Charlie said it was a warm call, that the president told Charlie he was doing a great job and that the admin was working on solutions. Charlie communicated that the grassroots wasn't going to move on easily, but was glad to hear things were in motion. I remember this well because he caught a bunch of bad headlines after the following Monday's show for saying he was "done talking about Epstein, for the time being" and was "going to trust his friends" and the "ball is in their court" to fix it. Charlie was upset by the coverage because the leftwing media reported it like he was done forever, but he was just trying to say he was giving the admin time to fix things without continuing to criticize. He felt he'd said enough over the weekend for the time being. The two calls were Saturday night, July 12, at SAS 2025. PS - For those trying to insinuate CK and POTUS were estranged in some way after the calls at SAS, that's not true. A week later, after the WSJ dropped the alleged birthday card story, Charlie defended the president again on the show and on X (screenshot attached) and countless more times in the months to follow.

Good for Gwenyth Paltrow!

I am respectfully requesting that @SusieWiles tell President Trump that "mutilization" is not a word. Please and thank you.