🚨MMAT / MMTLP / TRCH 📄 DTCC Delay Timeline - a closer 👀 ⚖️June 16, 2026 - Hearing Before Judge Gary Spraker ⚠️Not Legal Advice The Trustee’s June 11 filing paints a clear picture: DTCC has been delaying production for more than a year while statute-of-limitations deadlines continue to approach. ⏰ 📅 Key Timeline 🔵March 2025 Trustee serves Rule 2004 subpoena on DTCC. Production due April 8, 2025. ⬅️⬅️⬅️ 🔵March 26, 2025 DTCC acknowledges subpoena. Requests extension and protective order. 🔵April 7, 2025 Trustee grants DTCC a two-week extension. 🔵June 16, 2025 DTCC states it can provide: •Participant Daily Activity Statements •CNS Reports •UTC Reports (including Correspondent Clearing Data) for approximately $25,200. 💵 ⸻ 🚩 October 2025 – Frustration Boils Over 🔥 🔵October 21, 2025 Trustee counsel David Burnett warns: “If we don’t hear from you this week we plan to file a motion to compel.” 🔥 Later the same day, Burnett responds to DTCC: “You are the one that has not responded to our questions for four months or given edits or comments on the protective order for five months.” 💥 DTCC responds that production would occur only under an: “appropriately scoped Rule 2004 subpoena” and continues to reserve objections. ⸻ 🔵November 4, 2025 Burnett follows up again: “Please provide us the courtesy of a substantive, timely, and constructive response.” and warns: “If you continue to delay we will enforce our rights with the court.” ⸻ 📅 March 26, 2026 DTCC finally makes a partial production. However, Trustee says the critical transaction-level Correspondent Clearing Data was missing. ⁉️ ⸻ 📅 April–May 2026 🔵April 24 Trustee requests missing Correspondent Clearing Data. 🔵May 5 Another follow-up. Still unresolved. 🔵May 12 🚨Burnett warns: “Because of the time-sensitivity on our end and this dragged-out process, the Trustee is prepared to move to compel.” 🔵May 21 DTCC responds: IT team is still working on the report and having difficulty with aged data. 🔵May 26 Burnett replies: “We would like to get the additional data as soon as possible given time-sensitivities on our end.” ⏰ ⸻ 🔥 Key Statements From Burnett’s Declaration 📆Over One Year of Delay “I have been corresponding with DTCC’s in-house counsel… for over a year.” ➡️More Than 40 Emails “I have sent more than 40 emails to Ms. Bandler since spring 2025.” ➡️Weeks Between Responses “Ms. Bandler did not respond to some of my emails, and in some cases she did not respond for weeks.” 🌶️ ➡️Statute Concerns “Statute of limitations deadlines make DTCC’s immediate production of the remaining discovery very time-sensitive.” ⸻ ⚖️ What To POSSIBLY Expect Tuesday ⚠️NLA Judge Spraker will likely focus on: What specific data remains missing? Can DTCC actually produce it? How long will production take? How do the statute-of-limitations deadlines impact the estate? The Trustee’s filing appears designed to show: ✅ Subpoena issued March 2025 ✅ Extension granted ✅ Protective order negotiations ✅ 40 emails ✅ Partial production only ✅ Missing Correspondent Clearing Data ✅ Statute concerns repeatedly raised If DTCC arrives without a firm production timetable, Spraker may push for specific deadlines, status reporting, or a path toward a motion to compel. The filing strongly suggests the Trustee is documenting a year-long pattern of delay and connecting it directly to potential claim deadlines. ⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰

🚨MMAT / MMTLP / TRCH 📄 DTCC Delay Timeline - a closer 👀 ⚖️June 16, 2026 - Hearing Before Judge Gary Spraker ⚠️Not Legal Advice The Trustee’s June 11 filing paints a clear picture: DTCC has been delaying production for more than a year while statute-of-limitations deadlines continue to approach. ⏰ 📅 Key Timeline 🔵March 2025 Trustee serves Rule 2004 subpoena on DTCC. Production due April 8, 2025. ⬅️⬅️⬅️ 🔵March 26, 2025 DTCC acknowledges subpoena. Requests extension and protective order. 🔵April 7, 2025 Trustee grants DTCC a two-week extension. 🔵June 16, 2025 DTCC states it can provide: •Participant Daily Activity Statements •CNS Reports •UTC Reports (including Correspondent Clearing Data) for approximately $25,200. 💵 ⸻ 🚩 October 2025 – Frustration Boils Over 🔥 🔵October 21, 2025 Trustee counsel David Burnett warns: “If we don’t hear from you this week we plan to file a motion to compel.” 🔥 Later the same day, Burnett responds to DTCC: “You are the one that has not responded to our questions for four months or given edits or comments on the protective order for five months.” 💥 DTCC responds that production would occur only under an: “appropriately scoped Rule 2004 subpoena” and continues to reserve objections. ⸻ 🔵November 4, 2025 Burnett follows up again: “Please provide us the courtesy of a substantive, timely, and constructive response.” and warns: “If you continue to delay we will enforce our rights with the court.” ⸻ 📅 March 26, 2026 DTCC finally makes a partial production. However, Trustee says the critical transaction-level Correspondent Clearing Data was missing. ⁉️ ⸻ 📅 April–May 2026 🔵April 24 Trustee requests missing Correspondent Clearing Data. 🔵May 5 Another follow-up. Still unresolved. 🔵May 12 🚨Burnett warns: “Because of the time-sensitivity on our end and this dragged-out process, the Trustee is prepared to move to compel.” 🔵May 21 DTCC responds: IT team is still working on the report and having difficulty with aged data. 🔵May 26 Burnett replies: “We would like to get the additional data as soon as possible given time-sensitivities on our end.” ⏰ ⸻ 🔥 Key Statements From Burnett’s Declaration 📆Over One Year of Delay “I have been corresponding with DTCC’s in-house counsel… for over a year.” ➡️More Than 40 Emails “I have sent more than 40 emails to Ms. Bandler since spring 2025.” ➡️Weeks Between Responses “Ms. Bandler did not respond to some of my emails, and in some cases she did not respond for weeks.” 🌶️ ➡️Statute Concerns “Statute of limitations deadlines make DTCC’s immediate production of the remaining discovery very time-sensitive.” ⸻ ⚖️ What To POSSIBLY Expect Tuesday ⚠️NLA Judge Spraker will likely focus on: What specific data remains missing? Can DTCC actually produce it? How long will production take? How do the statute-of-limitations deadlines impact the estate? The Trustee’s filing appears designed to show: ✅ Subpoena issued March 2025 ✅ Extension granted ✅ Protective order negotiations ✅ 40 emails ✅ Partial production only ✅ Missing Correspondent Clearing Data ✅ Statute concerns repeatedly raised If DTCC arrives without a firm production timetable, Spraker may push for specific deadlines, status reporting, or a path toward a motion to compel. The filing strongly suggests the Trustee is documenting a year-long pattern of delay and connecting it directly to potential claim deadlines. ⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰

🚨MMAT / MMTLP / TRCH 📄 DTCC Delay Timeline - a closer 👀 ⚖️June 16, 2026 - Hearing Before Judge Gary Spraker ⚠️Not Legal Advice The Trustee’s June 11 filing paints a clear picture: DTCC has been delaying production for more than a year while statute-of-limitations deadlines continue to approach. ⏰ 📅 Key Timeline 🔵March 2025 Trustee serves Rule 2004 subpoena on DTCC. Production due April 8, 2025. ⬅️⬅️⬅️ 🔵March 26, 2025 DTCC acknowledges subpoena. Requests extension and protective order. 🔵April 7, 2025 Trustee grants DTCC a two-week extension. 🔵June 16, 2025 DTCC states it can provide: •Participant Daily Activity Statements •CNS Reports •UTC Reports (including Correspondent Clearing Data) for approximately $25,200. 💵 ⸻ 🚩 October 2025 – Frustration Boils Over 🔥 🔵October 21, 2025 Trustee counsel David Burnett warns: “If we don’t hear from you this week we plan to file a motion to compel.” 🔥 Later the same day, Burnett responds to DTCC: “You are the one that has not responded to our questions for four months or given edits or comments on the protective order for five months.” 💥 DTCC responds that production would occur only under an: “appropriately scoped Rule 2004 subpoena” and continues to reserve objections. ⸻ 🔵November 4, 2025 Burnett follows up again: “Please provide us the courtesy of a substantive, timely, and constructive response.” and warns: “If you continue to delay we will enforce our rights with the court.” ⸻ 📅 March 26, 2026 DTCC finally makes a partial production. However, Trustee says the critical transaction-level Correspondent Clearing Data was missing. ⁉️ ⸻ 📅 April–May 2026 🔵April 24 Trustee requests missing Correspondent Clearing Data. 🔵May 5 Another follow-up. Still unresolved. 🔵May 12 🚨Burnett warns: “Because of the time-sensitivity on our end and this dragged-out process, the Trustee is prepared to move to compel.” 🔵May 21 DTCC responds: IT team is still working on the report and having difficulty with aged data. 🔵May 26 Burnett replies: “We would like to get the additional data as soon as possible given time-sensitivities on our end.” ⏰ ⸻ 🔥 Key Statements From Burnett’s Declaration 📆Over One Year of Delay “I have been corresponding with DTCC’s in-house counsel… for over a year.” ➡️More Than 40 Emails “I have sent more than 40 emails to Ms. Bandler since spring 2025.” ➡️Weeks Between Responses “Ms. Bandler did not respond to some of my emails, and in some cases she did not respond for weeks.” 🌶️ ➡️Statute Concerns “Statute of limitations deadlines make DTCC’s immediate production of the remaining discovery very time-sensitive.” ⸻ ⚖️ What To POSSIBLY Expect Tuesday ⚠️NLA Judge Spraker will likely focus on: What specific data remains missing? Can DTCC actually produce it? How long will production take? How do the statute-of-limitations deadlines impact the estate? The Trustee’s filing appears designed to show: ✅ Subpoena issued March 2025 ✅ Extension granted ✅ Protective order negotiations ✅ 40 emails ✅ Partial production only ✅ Missing Correspondent Clearing Data ✅ Statute concerns repeatedly raised If DTCC arrives without a firm production timetable, Spraker may push for specific deadlines, status reporting, or a path toward a motion to compel. The filing strongly suggests the Trustee is documenting a year-long pattern of delay and connecting it directly to potential claim deadlines. ⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰

Anatomy of a Reverse Pump and Dump Conspiracy Vol II (short and distort operation) They execute their market manipulation through “clever” typos and horrendously misstated financials (that a 5th grader with AI could have caught in editing), while grasping at straws elsewhere (perhaps that’s even the point? ..keep regulators focused on the nothing burger tweet threads while the stock operation was the material financials mistakes in the report…notice how their 🗑️🔥 financials comments weren’t the main part of the Twitter story with a company funded for 6 quarters with growing [world class institutional] onboarding, products and OI). This report doesn’t need to stand the test of time because it’s a 30min stock [manipulation] operation that works or fails on the first trading day, the short seller is already working to cover the morning of the stock manipulation (see exert from a Bloomberg article from another short and distort operation testimony below—the hedge fund and shady shell game company with the newsletter are interchangeable). ..Every pattern seen in our stock the weeks before and morning of matches the article. We have all of the reverse pump and dump data captured for regulators, Morgan Stanley, etc. They already failed their operation in the market IMO, but now their next task is to try and avoid ankle bracelets as all the rats start to turn on each other (this newsletter and the funds will be slippery across jurisdictions though, a big part of the operation). Had a number of great conversation around Toronto yesterday. Mr. S will have his face plastered on a wanted poster around Toronto on Monday. Many capital markets people in Toronto want to see these guys hang as well, tired of Canada’s bad reputation, but haven had the neurodivergent CEO with the global regulator relationships that we do. All information is coming to light already (especially with my key plant pulling the pieces together). We coming

🚨MMAT / MMTLP / TRCH 📄 DTCC Delay Timeline - a closer 👀 ⚖️June 16, 2026 - Hearing Before Judge Gary Spraker ⚠️Not Legal Advice The Trustee’s June 11 filing paints a clear picture: DTCC has been delaying production for more than a year while statute-of-limitations deadlines continue to approach. ⏰ 📅 Key Timeline 🔵March 2025 Trustee serves Rule 2004 subpoena on DTCC. Production due April 8, 2025. ⬅️⬅️⬅️ 🔵March 26, 2025 DTCC acknowledges subpoena. Requests extension and protective order. 🔵April 7, 2025 Trustee grants DTCC a two-week extension. 🔵June 16, 2025 DTCC states it can provide: •Participant Daily Activity Statements •CNS Reports •UTC Reports (including Correspondent Clearing Data) for approximately $25,200. 💵 ⸻ 🚩 October 2025 – Frustration Boils Over 🔥 🔵October 21, 2025 Trustee counsel David Burnett warns: “If we don’t hear from you this week we plan to file a motion to compel.” 🔥 Later the same day, Burnett responds to DTCC: “You are the one that has not responded to our questions for four months or given edits or comments on the protective order for five months.” 💥 DTCC responds that production would occur only under an: “appropriately scoped Rule 2004 subpoena” and continues to reserve objections. ⸻ 🔵November 4, 2025 Burnett follows up again: “Please provide us the courtesy of a substantive, timely, and constructive response.” and warns: “If you continue to delay we will enforce our rights with the court.” ⸻ 📅 March 26, 2026 DTCC finally makes a partial production. However, Trustee says the critical transaction-level Correspondent Clearing Data was missing. ⁉️ ⸻ 📅 April–May 2026 🔵April 24 Trustee requests missing Correspondent Clearing Data. 🔵May 5 Another follow-up. Still unresolved. 🔵May 12 🚨Burnett warns: “Because of the time-sensitivity on our end and this dragged-out process, the Trustee is prepared to move to compel.” 🔵May 21 DTCC responds: IT team is still working on the report and having difficulty with aged data. 🔵May 26 Burnett replies: “We would like to get the additional data as soon as possible given time-sensitivities on our end.” ⏰ ⸻ 🔥 Key Statements From Burnett’s Declaration 📆Over One Year of Delay “I have been corresponding with DTCC’s in-house counsel… for over a year.” ➡️More Than 40 Emails “I have sent more than 40 emails to Ms. Bandler since spring 2025.” ➡️Weeks Between Responses “Ms. Bandler did not respond to some of my emails, and in some cases she did not respond for weeks.” 🌶️ ➡️Statute Concerns “Statute of limitations deadlines make DTCC’s immediate production of the remaining discovery very time-sensitive.” ⸻ ⚖️ What To POSSIBLY Expect Tuesday ⚠️NLA Judge Spraker will likely focus on: What specific data remains missing? Can DTCC actually produce it? How long will production take? How do the statute-of-limitations deadlines impact the estate? The Trustee’s filing appears designed to show: ✅ Subpoena issued March 2025 ✅ Extension granted ✅ Protective order negotiations ✅ 40 emails ✅ Partial production only ✅ Missing Correspondent Clearing Data ✅ Statute concerns repeatedly raised If DTCC arrives without a firm production timetable, Spraker may push for specific deadlines, status reporting, or a path toward a motion to compel. The filing strongly suggests the Trustee is documenting a year-long pattern of delay and connecting it directly to potential claim deadlines. ⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰

📣📣JUDGE GRANTS HEARING DTCC SUBPOENA COMPLIANCE 🔥🔥🌶🌶 The Judge in the MMAT MMTLP Bankruptcy case has granted the hearing. Regarding the DTCC subpoenaed records they haven't complied with. The trustee is this case is awesome, a real blessing 🙏 Hearing set for June 16th, 2026 9.30am