Joined June 2025
- Tweets 1,063
- Following 40
- Followers 40
- Likes 1,271
447 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
21 Oct 2025
Your contracts aren’t slow, your tools are.
At Clausecore, we built an AI that reviews faster, flags risk smarter & protects better.
Start your 14-day free trial → clausecore.tech
#ContractIntelligence #LegalOps #founderstory #Clausecore #LegalTech
2
2
7
324
ClauseCore retweeted
Mar 23
Hard work > Talent
Smart work > Hard Work
Consistent hard work > smart work
Consistent Smart work >hard work
But you gotta do hard work to learn what smart work is.
And you gotta do it consistently to even see it work to begin with.
294
394
3,597
69,728
Mar 23
Most compliance failures aren’t legal failures.
They’re leadership failures wearing legal language as a disguise.
1
7
Mar 23
The clause existed.
The policy was written.
The audit trail was spotless.
But nobody in that room understood what they’d actually agreed to.
That’s on leadership. Not legal.
1
8
Mar 23
Clarity isn’t something you delegate to your GC and move on.
It’s a decision you make as a leader, every time a contract, policy, or agreement touches your business.
Own it.
“Clarity isn’t a legal problem. It’s a leadership problem.”
@DObasi71110
16
Mar 20
Risk management isn’t about fear.
It’s about control.
If your system can’t show you where things stand,
it can’t protect you.
Confidence scales when clarity does.
6
Mar 20
If your contracts cross borders, your contract tool should too.
We get asked this a lot and the answer is yes.
ClauseCore is built to handle multi-jurisdictional contracts. Whether you’re working across UK law, Delaware incorporation, or international commercial frameworks, ClauseCore processes what you bring it.
1
9
Mar 20
Because in global legal work, the risk isn’t just in the clauses.
It’s in assuming one jurisdiction when there are three.
Save this if your team manages cross-border contracts.
See it in action clausecore.tech
2
Mar 19
A vendor walked away with $4.2 million of a company’s money.
No court battle. No fraud. No scandal.
Just a contract. And one section nobody finished reading.
🧵 Here’s how it happened and why it could happen to anyone signing deals right now.
1
5
Mar 19
The agreement looked standard.
The meeting was quick. Everyone felt good about the deal. Signatures went down.
What nobody caught was buried inside the indemnification clause, language that placed zero ceiling on what the company could owe.
Not a cap of $1M. Not $5M.
No cap at all.
1
5
Mar 19
The painful part isn’t the $4.2M.
It’s that the clause was right there. One paragraph. Plain language. Nothing hidden.
It just never got flagged.
That’s exactly what @clausecore_AI is built for catching the language your team shouldn’t have to hunt for manually.
Explore clausecore.tech
2
Mar 19
He signed the contract.
One clause changed everything.
Not just for the founder…
For legal. For compliance. For the entire business.
Because if it’s in the contract,
the risk belongs to you.
And it shows up when it’s enforced, not when you sign.
ClauseCore flags the clauses that matter
before they cost you.
1
1
15
Mar 18
Most people sign this clause without a second thought.
Most experienced lawyers cannot agree on whether that's fine or catastrophic.
That gap, between what looks standard and what actually protects you is where contracts fail.
Which position are you taking?
1
13
Mar 17
A $50M contract collapsed over 3 words.
“Reasonable technical standards.”
That’s it. One vague clause. One year in court. Millions gone.
This is why clause-level drafting isn’t optional anymore.
AI Clause Trainer → clausecore.tech
1
1
2
13
Mar 18
Most legal battles don’t start in court.
They start in the clause nobody looked at closely enough.
Get started with 14days free trial clausecore.tech
4
Mar 17
He built the brand. Trained the team. Lost the recipes.
Not to theft. Not to a lawsuit. To a clause he never wrote.
The most expensive business losses aren’t the dramatic ones.
They’re the quiet ones that happen in contracts nobody read carefully enough.
2
1
2
11
Mar 17
Who’s this for?
Founders. Contractors. Developers. Anyone building something worth protecting.
Save this thread before you need it.
1
7
Mar 17
Here’s what nobody tells you about intellectual property:
Intent means nothing in court.
Contribution means nothing. What you assumed the agreement covered means nothing.
The only thing that holds up is what’s written and if ownership was never formally assigned, a judge will decide who gets it. Default rules don’t care how hard you worked.
1
2
10
Mar 17
The people most exposed to this aren’t careless.
They’re builders who assumed creating something was the same as owning it.
It isn’t.
Clausecore catches the gaps before someone else does.
clausecore.tech
1
12
Mar 16
Most contract problems were not hiding.
They were right there in the clause everyone skimmed because it looked standard.
You signed it. They signed it. Nobody flagged it.
Until it became the most expensive sentence in the agreement.
Unclear language does not stay neutral. It picks a side the moment something goes wrong.
And it rarely picks yours
1
2
8