I see half of UAP twitter believing the “Nordics” image with Trump may be real. 5 minutes of searching and can find that it’s from some cringey AI edit consisting of similar images from days ago.

Page Six reports that UFO storyteller David Grusch "is now a producer on SEVERAL high profile (movie) projects, including one by Jerry Bruckheimer".

🚨Rep Luna: We have had the "meat and potatoes" of the UFO Files Douthat asks: "Is there anything else out there that is a holy shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well other testimony they're still combing. But as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, for the most part, it’s been put out." I have to be honest that doesn't fill me with confidence, what do you think? #ufotwitter #uapX #Disclosure Source: Interesting Times with Ross Douthat youtube.com/watch?v=9PVIHqkp…

I was quoting James when I said that but deleted it because I don't want to set the bar too high on David's press conference, no evidence to me that anything will be too far beyond what we know now, so it felt irresponsible, does that make sense?

A Skeptical Guide to UFO Cases and Claims With Steven Spielberg’s new blockbuster film "Disclosure Day" about to debut, scientists and educators will face a new barrage of student and public questions about UFOs (or, as they have been rebranded, UAPs). @AndrewFraknoi has put together an updated guide to resources explaining what skeptics have found about UFO cases and claims. These include what really happened at Roswell, New Mexico, and analyses of the recent spate of military images, videos, and Congressional testimony. Most of the resources cited are easily and freely available on the Web. The free guide can be found at: bit.ly/ufoskeptic (PDF)

Im sure there are 1000s of videos. Think about all the aircraft we have and think about all the flights they do. All that information gets recorded and saved, it just doesn't show anything other than the same types of shit we keep seeing over and over again. When it's not showing that usual boring crap maybe it's seeing some of our adversaries stuff that the Pentagon doesn't want the public or really our adversaries to know we saw. There will be no disclosure bc there's nothing to disclose. Maybe we'll get an interesting video here or a hard to explain video there, but it's just gonna be the same type of crap over and over again pretty much. I have a feeling if the Republicans lose the House and thus the Chairmanships of all their Committees, we're gonna be seeing a lot less of this bullshit bc smarter heads will prevail on this. What happens after that? Who knows, I'd imagine most people slowly lose interest in it.

None of it makes sense. The programs were supposedly being run illegally by a secret government within the government or some shadow deep state cabal. That doesn't make any sense bc then all the NDAs and security clearances that were supposedly preventing them all from spilling the beans would've been completely voided. You had people trying to argue that submitting information to DOPSR was a great way to make the government slip up and reveal secret shit somehow which was just insanely idiotic. DOPSR isn't checking for facts, it's just checking for classified information which it then redacts. There was the whole Grusch not going to AARO thing bc they supposedly weren't cleared to know the stuff he knew which made 0 sense at all. It's in their mandate to hear anything and everything UAP related. That's the whole reason it was set up. If the programs were illegal that would be like mainstream front page news and a major issue for all of Congress. Supposedly Grusch briefed the President at some point but now the President is calling Ross Coulthart and Jeremy Corbell to help guide them on who to talk to? Now we're into the private contractor phase. So bc nothing turned up at the Pentagon, now they gonna somehow force private aerospace companies to turn over and show off their advanced secret or experimental tech to some low level zany members of Congress? It's the dumbest shit ever.

Shockingly, I will agree with him on that. I have said the same thing now, which isn't popular, for decades. I do not believe that "disclosure" will happen the way people want, and I believe that the biggest names in UFOlogy are that efforts own worst enemy.

It’s silly. He’s apparently then gate keeping the information he’s screaming for “transparency” about. It’s theatrics and drama. And if it’s true, it’s very telling.

@LuAngeles any debunk here?

@robjonesreports @JeremyCorbell @TheUfoJoe @The_Astral_ @UAPJames @CMelloncholy @ChrisUKSharp

LOL. No, they didn't. Great story to plug the new pay per view doco just released, though!

Where did you get this? I am unaware of my “staffers” making such a claim.

It is now firmly on the table that we might get some form of confirmation of non-human intelligence, but I have heard that revealing crash retrieval or derivative technologies is not under consideration whatsoever

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. This process was always going to be difficult and convoluted. Patience and persistence is required to win this battle.

We went from Rep. Tim Burchett saying the next UFO files batch would be a “holy crap” moment last week…to Rep. Eric Burlison warning people not to get their hopes up because a lot of the UFO videos look like birds and balloons. 🫠

“Are you a believer?” Rep. Eric Burlison: “No.” Even after seeing the UFO videos, classified briefings, congressional testimony, and having David Grusch as an advisor, Burlison still says he doesn’t believe in aliens or UFOs. 😳